Meytal Nasie, Sondos Abofoul, Arielle Ankri-Guedj, Gil Diesendruck
{"title":"Intergroup bias in children's preference for in- versus out-group informants.","authors":"Meytal Nasie, Sondos Abofoul, Arielle Ankri-Guedj, Gil Diesendruck","doi":"10.1037/dev0002048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research explored whether children manifest intergroup biases in their choice of informants from in- versus out-groups. We conducted two studies among Israeli Jewish and Arab children aged 5- and 8-year-old (<i>N</i> = 260; 51% girls, 49% boys). Study 1 served as a baseline with nonsocial targets of information, whereas Study 2 had people as targets. We examined biases in three respects: assessment of informants' expertise, preference for informants, and acceptance of informants' advice. Results revealed intergroup biases in children's choices of informants in all three respects, particularly when learning about people, and among younger and minority group children. The findings highlight how epistemic and social identity cues affect children's informant's choice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present research explored whether children manifest intergroup biases in their choice of informants from in- versus out-groups. We conducted two studies among Israeli Jewish and Arab children aged 5- and 8-year-old (N = 260; 51% girls, 49% boys). Study 1 served as a baseline with nonsocial targets of information, whereas Study 2 had people as targets. We examined biases in three respects: assessment of informants' expertise, preference for informants, and acceptance of informants' advice. Results revealed intergroup biases in children's choices of informants in all three respects, particularly when learning about people, and among younger and minority group children. The findings highlight how epistemic and social identity cues affect children's informant's choice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.