{"title":"Developmental trajectories of predictive mechanisms in language comprehension.","authors":"Armando Quetzalcóatl Angulo-Chavira, Alejandra Mitzi Castellón-Flores, Natalia Arias-Trejo","doi":"10.1037/dev0002045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this investigation, we delved into the developmental progression of two predictive mechanisms in language comprehension: the associative (Mechanism 1) and the context- and intention-dependent (Mechanism 2). Across three experiments, we assessed the ability to predict semantic content based on syntactic cues among toddlers and adults. Participants were exposed to correction (e.g., \"In the yard, I saw a dog, no, a rabbit\") and coordination (e.g., \"In the yard, I saw a dog and a rabbit\") sentences. Concurrently, they viewed four competing images: two nouns included in the sentences, an associative distractor, and an unrelated distractor. Experiment 1A revealed that, unlike adults, 30-month-old toddlers predominantly anticipated the associative distractor in coordinated sentences but not in the correction ones. Experiment 1B expanded the age range to include preschoolers and school-aged children, echoing the findings of Experiment 1A. Notably, as age increased, predictions began to mirror adultlike tendencies. Experiment 2, which included a larger prediction window, evaluated 24- and 30-month-old toddlers. The results revealed that toddlers generated predictive behaviors in both sentence types. However, in contrast to their younger counterparts, the older group demonstrated faster predictive responses in coordination compared to correction contexts. Collectively, our experiments underscore that predictions are predominantly steered by Mechanism 1 during the initial stages of development; however, as children age, their predictive strategies rely more on the context and speakers' intentions. We postulate that the evolution of Mechanism 2 hinges on the emergence of inhibitory mechanisms that modulate the activation driven by Mechanism 1. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this investigation, we delved into the developmental progression of two predictive mechanisms in language comprehension: the associative (Mechanism 1) and the context- and intention-dependent (Mechanism 2). Across three experiments, we assessed the ability to predict semantic content based on syntactic cues among toddlers and adults. Participants were exposed to correction (e.g., "In the yard, I saw a dog, no, a rabbit") and coordination (e.g., "In the yard, I saw a dog and a rabbit") sentences. Concurrently, they viewed four competing images: two nouns included in the sentences, an associative distractor, and an unrelated distractor. Experiment 1A revealed that, unlike adults, 30-month-old toddlers predominantly anticipated the associative distractor in coordinated sentences but not in the correction ones. Experiment 1B expanded the age range to include preschoolers and school-aged children, echoing the findings of Experiment 1A. Notably, as age increased, predictions began to mirror adultlike tendencies. Experiment 2, which included a larger prediction window, evaluated 24- and 30-month-old toddlers. The results revealed that toddlers generated predictive behaviors in both sentence types. However, in contrast to their younger counterparts, the older group demonstrated faster predictive responses in coordination compared to correction contexts. Collectively, our experiments underscore that predictions are predominantly steered by Mechanism 1 during the initial stages of development; however, as children age, their predictive strategies rely more on the context and speakers' intentions. We postulate that the evolution of Mechanism 2 hinges on the emergence of inhibitory mechanisms that modulate the activation driven by Mechanism 1. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.