Developmental trajectories of predictive mechanisms in language comprehension.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Armando Quetzalcóatl Angulo-Chavira, Alejandra Mitzi Castellón-Flores, Natalia Arias-Trejo
{"title":"Developmental trajectories of predictive mechanisms in language comprehension.","authors":"Armando Quetzalcóatl Angulo-Chavira, Alejandra Mitzi Castellón-Flores, Natalia Arias-Trejo","doi":"10.1037/dev0002045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this investigation, we delved into the developmental progression of two predictive mechanisms in language comprehension: the associative (Mechanism 1) and the context- and intention-dependent (Mechanism 2). Across three experiments, we assessed the ability to predict semantic content based on syntactic cues among toddlers and adults. Participants were exposed to correction (e.g., \"In the yard, I saw a dog, no, a rabbit\") and coordination (e.g., \"In the yard, I saw a dog and a rabbit\") sentences. Concurrently, they viewed four competing images: two nouns included in the sentences, an associative distractor, and an unrelated distractor. Experiment 1A revealed that, unlike adults, 30-month-old toddlers predominantly anticipated the associative distractor in coordinated sentences but not in the correction ones. Experiment 1B expanded the age range to include preschoolers and school-aged children, echoing the findings of Experiment 1A. Notably, as age increased, predictions began to mirror adultlike tendencies. Experiment 2, which included a larger prediction window, evaluated 24- and 30-month-old toddlers. The results revealed that toddlers generated predictive behaviors in both sentence types. However, in contrast to their younger counterparts, the older group demonstrated faster predictive responses in coordination compared to correction contexts. Collectively, our experiments underscore that predictions are predominantly steered by Mechanism 1 during the initial stages of development; however, as children age, their predictive strategies rely more on the context and speakers' intentions. We postulate that the evolution of Mechanism 2 hinges on the emergence of inhibitory mechanisms that modulate the activation driven by Mechanism 1. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this investigation, we delved into the developmental progression of two predictive mechanisms in language comprehension: the associative (Mechanism 1) and the context- and intention-dependent (Mechanism 2). Across three experiments, we assessed the ability to predict semantic content based on syntactic cues among toddlers and adults. Participants were exposed to correction (e.g., "In the yard, I saw a dog, no, a rabbit") and coordination (e.g., "In the yard, I saw a dog and a rabbit") sentences. Concurrently, they viewed four competing images: two nouns included in the sentences, an associative distractor, and an unrelated distractor. Experiment 1A revealed that, unlike adults, 30-month-old toddlers predominantly anticipated the associative distractor in coordinated sentences but not in the correction ones. Experiment 1B expanded the age range to include preschoolers and school-aged children, echoing the findings of Experiment 1A. Notably, as age increased, predictions began to mirror adultlike tendencies. Experiment 2, which included a larger prediction window, evaluated 24- and 30-month-old toddlers. The results revealed that toddlers generated predictive behaviors in both sentence types. However, in contrast to their younger counterparts, the older group demonstrated faster predictive responses in coordination compared to correction contexts. Collectively, our experiments underscore that predictions are predominantly steered by Mechanism 1 during the initial stages of development; however, as children age, their predictive strategies rely more on the context and speakers' intentions. We postulate that the evolution of Mechanism 2 hinges on the emergence of inhibitory mechanisms that modulate the activation driven by Mechanism 1. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

语言理解中预测机制的发展轨迹。
在本研究中,我们探讨了两种语言理解预测机制的发展过程:联想机制(机制一)和语境和意图依赖机制(机制二)。通过三个实验,我们评估了幼儿和成人基于句法线索预测语义内容的能力。参与者被暴露在纠正(例如,“在院子里,我看到了一只狗,不,是一只兔子”)和协调(例如,“在院子里,我看到了一只狗和一只兔子”)的句子中。同时,他们观看了四个相互竞争的图像:句子中包含的两个名词,联想干扰物和不相关干扰物。实验1A显示,与成人不同,30个月大的幼儿在协调句中主要预测联想干扰物,而在纠正句中则没有。实验1B扩大了年龄范围,包括学龄前儿童和学龄儿童,与实验1A的发现相呼应。值得注意的是,随着年龄的增长,预测开始反映出成年人的倾向。实验2包括一个更大的预测窗口,评估了24个月和30个月大的幼儿。结果显示,幼儿在两种句子类型中都产生了预测行为。然而,与年轻人相比,老年组在协调方面表现出更快的预测反应。总的来说,我们的实验强调,在发展的初始阶段,预测主要由机制1引导;然而,随着孩子年龄的增长,他们的预测策略更多地依赖于语境和说话人的意图。我们假设机制2的进化取决于抑制机制的出现,抑制机制调节由机制1驱动的激活。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信