How Downhill and Uphill Running Interfere Posture and Muscle Activity: A Descriptive Laboratory Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.142485
Nadine Engeler, Eric Lichtenstein, Oliver Faude, Ralf Roth
{"title":"How Downhill and Uphill Running Interfere Posture and Muscle Activity: A Descriptive Laboratory Study.","authors":"Nadine Engeler, Eric Lichtenstein, Oliver Faude, Ralf Roth","doi":"10.26603/001c.142485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Downhill and uphill running alter running kinematics, changing force distributions and muscle activities. While changes in the lower limbs have received more attention, research on the back and pelvis remains scarce. Understanding grade-specific changes in the trunk is crucial for developing injury prevention strategies and return-to-activity protocols after back injuries.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how running on six different gradients (ranging from -15% downhill to +15% uphill) affects back and pelvic posture, as well as muscle activity in trunk and lower limb muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve healthy recreational runners (6 women, 6 men) participated in a descriptive laboratory study. Kinematic variables (lumbar lordosis, hip drop, pelvic tilt, and trunk inclination) were assessed via 3D motion capture. Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity, normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), in selected trunk and lower limb muscles, including the medial gastrocnemius, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus lateralis, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts was used to compare each gradient to level running. Cohen's d was calculated to quantify effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to level running lumbar lordosis was increased at -15% (mean difference [MD]: 1.2 ± 4.9 degrees, Cohen's d = 0.73, p-value = 0.007) and decreased at +15% (MD: -1 ± 3.6 degrees, d = 0.39, p = 0.290). Total hip drop decreased at -15% (MD: 14.2 ± 11 mm, d = 1.93, p < 0.001). Muscular activity of certain lower limb muscles was higher at steep downhill and uphill gradients. While the abdominals showed no consistent changes across gradients, activity of erector spinae was reduced at -10% and -5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Downhill running increases lumbar lordosis, potentially elevating the risk of lumbar spine overload. When attempting to prevent and rehabilitate lower back injuries, a progression starting with uphill, followed by level and lastly by downhill running, may be advisable. Gradient-specific training should be considered due to the distinct neuromuscular demands across inclines.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 8","pages":"1186-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.142485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Downhill and uphill running alter running kinematics, changing force distributions and muscle activities. While changes in the lower limbs have received more attention, research on the back and pelvis remains scarce. Understanding grade-specific changes in the trunk is crucial for developing injury prevention strategies and return-to-activity protocols after back injuries.

Purpose: This study examined how running on six different gradients (ranging from -15% downhill to +15% uphill) affects back and pelvic posture, as well as muscle activity in trunk and lower limb muscles.

Methods: Twelve healthy recreational runners (6 women, 6 men) participated in a descriptive laboratory study. Kinematic variables (lumbar lordosis, hip drop, pelvic tilt, and trunk inclination) were assessed via 3D motion capture. Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity, normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), in selected trunk and lower limb muscles, including the medial gastrocnemius, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus lateralis, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts was used to compare each gradient to level running. Cohen's d was calculated to quantify effect sizes.

Results: Compared to level running lumbar lordosis was increased at -15% (mean difference [MD]: 1.2 ± 4.9 degrees, Cohen's d = 0.73, p-value = 0.007) and decreased at +15% (MD: -1 ± 3.6 degrees, d = 0.39, p = 0.290). Total hip drop decreased at -15% (MD: 14.2 ± 11 mm, d = 1.93, p < 0.001). Muscular activity of certain lower limb muscles was higher at steep downhill and uphill gradients. While the abdominals showed no consistent changes across gradients, activity of erector spinae was reduced at -10% and -5%.

Conclusion: Downhill running increases lumbar lordosis, potentially elevating the risk of lumbar spine overload. When attempting to prevent and rehabilitate lower back injuries, a progression starting with uphill, followed by level and lastly by downhill running, may be advisable. Gradient-specific training should be considered due to the distinct neuromuscular demands across inclines.

Level of evidence: 3b.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

下坡和上坡跑步如何影响姿势和肌肉活动:一项描述性实验室研究。
背景:下坡和上坡跑步改变了跑步运动学,改变了力量分布和肌肉活动。虽然下肢的变化得到了更多的关注,但对背部和骨盆的研究仍然很少。了解躯干的年级特异性变化对于制定损伤预防策略和背部损伤后恢复活动方案至关重要。目的:本研究考察了六种不同坡度(从-15%下坡到+15%上坡)对背部和骨盆姿势的影响,以及躯干和下肢肌肉的肌肉活动。方法:12名健康的休闲跑步者(6男6女)参加描述性实验室研究。运动学变量(腰椎前凸、髋下垂、骨盆倾斜和躯干倾斜)通过3D运动捕捉进行评估。表面肌电图记录了选定躯干和下肢肌肉的肌肉活动,归一化至最大自主等距收缩(MVIC),包括内侧腓肠肌、半腱肌、股二头肌、臀大肌、臀中肌、股外侧肌、腹直肌、外斜肌和竖棘。使用随机截距的线性混合效应模型来比较每个梯度与水平运行。计算Cohen's d来量化效应大小。结果:与水平跑步相比,腰前凸增加了-15%(平均差[MD]: 1.2 ±4.9度,科恩氏d = 0.73, p值= 0.007),减少了+15% (MD: -1 ±3.6度,d = 0.39, p = 0.290)。总髋关节下降-15% (MD: 14.2±11 mm, d = 1.93, p < 0.001)。在陡坡下坡和陡坡上坡时,下肢某些肌肉的肌肉活动较高。虽然腹部在各梯度上没有一致的变化,但竖脊肌的活动在-10%和-5%时减少。结论:下坡跑步增加腰椎前凸,可能增加腰椎负荷过重的风险。当试图预防和恢复下背部损伤时,从上坡开始,然后是水平跑,最后是下坡跑,可能是可取的。由于不同斜坡的神经肌肉需求不同,应考虑梯度特异性训练。证据等级:3b。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信