Provider's attitudes towards telehealth and parenting interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory cross-sectional study from Brazil and Mexico.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marina Kohlsdorf, Cole Hooley, Alejandro L Vázquez, Mariana M Juras, Grant Decker, Taylor Iskalis, Kayla Miller, Quinn Tompkins, Nancy G A Buenabad, Michela Ribeiro, Acileide C F Coelho, Ana A Baumann
{"title":"Provider's attitudes towards telehealth and parenting interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory cross-sectional study from Brazil and Mexico.","authors":"Marina Kohlsdorf, Cole Hooley, Alejandro L Vázquez, Mariana M Juras, Grant Decker, Taylor Iskalis, Kayla Miller, Quinn Tompkins, Nancy G A Buenabad, Michela Ribeiro, Acileide C F Coelho, Ana A Baumann","doi":"10.1186/s41155-025-00360-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges for mental health providers all over the world, since they had to abruptly change from in person assistance to remote meetings. The adverse effects from social isolation were critical in Latinx populations such as Brazil and Mexico, since these countries faced a great amount of social, health, and economic burden during the pandemic, which affected families' access to care and increased inappropriate parenting practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand the impacts of adapting parenting interventions to online sessions for Brazilian and Mexican providers, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two Brazilian and 49 Mexican mental health care providers that worked with parenting interventions (including psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists, counselors, and others) took part in this study. The measures included two standardized questionnaires (the Questionnaire about Acceptability, Feasibility and Appropriateness of Telehealth, and the Epidemic-Pandemic Impact Inventory), demographic data, and complementary items developed specially for this study. All measures were translated from English to Brazilian Portuguese and Spanish, resulting in five sets of themes related to (a) service delivery, (b) barriers to mental health assistance, (c) acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of telehealth, and (d) impacts of pandemic on providers´ professional and personal lives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all participants, adapting to online sessions presented challenges related to technology issues, time management, less healthy habits, and overload of chores between work and home tasks, besides concerns related to confidentiality and privacy. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Tests revealed that Mexican providers reported less barriers regarding technology, while Brazilian providers mentioned less economic impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study describes a comparison between providers of two Latinx countries facing demands from COVID19 pandemic, showing common challenges and specific barriers. Suggestions are presented in order to improve the experience of telehealth (i.e., tailored sessions, guidelines for families that ensure privacy, and policies that can increase telehealth access for vulnerable populations).</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"38 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-025-00360-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges for mental health providers all over the world, since they had to abruptly change from in person assistance to remote meetings. The adverse effects from social isolation were critical in Latinx populations such as Brazil and Mexico, since these countries faced a great amount of social, health, and economic burden during the pandemic, which affected families' access to care and increased inappropriate parenting practices.

Objective: This study aimed to understand the impacts of adapting parenting interventions to online sessions for Brazilian and Mexican providers, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Sixty-two Brazilian and 49 Mexican mental health care providers that worked with parenting interventions (including psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists, counselors, and others) took part in this study. The measures included two standardized questionnaires (the Questionnaire about Acceptability, Feasibility and Appropriateness of Telehealth, and the Epidemic-Pandemic Impact Inventory), demographic data, and complementary items developed specially for this study. All measures were translated from English to Brazilian Portuguese and Spanish, resulting in five sets of themes related to (a) service delivery, (b) barriers to mental health assistance, (c) acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of telehealth, and (d) impacts of pandemic on providers´ professional and personal lives.

Results: For all participants, adapting to online sessions presented challenges related to technology issues, time management, less healthy habits, and overload of chores between work and home tasks, besides concerns related to confidentiality and privacy. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Tests revealed that Mexican providers reported less barriers regarding technology, while Brazilian providers mentioned less economic impact.

Conclusion: This study describes a comparison between providers of two Latinx countries facing demands from COVID19 pandemic, showing common challenges and specific barriers. Suggestions are presented in order to improve the experience of telehealth (i.e., tailored sessions, guidelines for families that ensure privacy, and policies that can increase telehealth access for vulnerable populations).

在COVID-19大流行期间,提供者对远程医疗和育儿干预的态度:来自巴西和墨西哥的探索性横断面研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行给世界各地的精神卫生服务提供者带来了挑战,因为他们不得不突然从面对面的援助转变为远程会议。社会隔离的不利影响对巴西和墨西哥等拉丁裔人口至关重要,因为这些国家在大流行期间面临着巨大的社会、健康和经济负担,影响了家庭获得护理的机会,并增加了不当的养育做法。目的:本研究旨在了解由于COVID-19大流行,巴西和墨西哥提供者将育儿干预措施调整为在线课程的影响。方法:62名巴西和49名墨西哥精神卫生保健提供者(包括心理学家、社会工作者、职业治疗师、咨询师等)参与了这项研究。这些措施包括两份标准化问卷(《远程医疗的可接受性、可行性和适当性问卷》和《流行病-大流行影响清单》)、人口统计数据以及专门为本研究开发的补充项目。所有措施都从英语翻译成巴西葡萄牙语和西班牙语,形成了五套主题,涉及(a)服务提供,(b)心理健康援助的障碍,(c)远程保健的可接受性、可行性和适当性,以及(d)流行病对提供者职业和个人生活的影响。结果:对于所有参与者来说,适应在线会议带来了与技术问题、时间管理、不太健康的习惯、工作和家庭任务之间的杂务过载有关的挑战,此外还有与保密和隐私有关的问题。Kruskal-Wallis秩和测试显示,墨西哥供应商报告的技术障碍较少,而巴西供应商提到的经济影响较小。结论:本研究描述了面对covid - 19大流行需求的两个拉丁国家的提供者的比较,显示了共同的挑战和具体的障碍。提出了改善远程保健体验的建议(即,量身定制的会议、确保隐私的家庭准则以及可增加弱势群体获得远程保健机会的政策)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信