Is Mental Effort Exertion Contagious? A Replication Study.

IF 2.3 Q1 Psychology
Journal of Cognition Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/joc.456
Alessandro Mazza, Ellen Voorrips, Gethin Hughes, Kobe Desender, Eva Van den Bussche, Hans Stuyck
{"title":"Is Mental Effort Exertion Contagious? A Replication Study.","authors":"Alessandro Mazza, Ellen Voorrips, Gethin Hughes, Kobe Desender, Eva Van den Bussche, Hans Stuyck","doi":"10.5334/joc.456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily, we perform activities in the presence of others (e.g., office work). While it's well-established that the mere presence of others can influence our performance, it is less clear whether others' performance, rather than just their presence, influences us. To address this, we replicated Desender et al.'s (2016) study, <i>Is mental effort contagious?</i>, and conducted a second experiment to follow up on our failure to replicate their findings. Desender et al. (2016) used a modified joint Simon task where two participants performed side by side. The manipulated participant completed an easy (mostly congruent trials) and a difficult (mostly incongruent trials) block, while the neutral participant completed two neutral blocks (equal proportion of congruent and incongruent trials). They found that the neutral participant mirrored the manipulated participants' mental effort, exerting more effort when the latter performed a difficult versus an easy task. In both Experiment 1 (exact replication; <i>N</i> = 176) and Experiment 2 (more demanding joint Simon task; <i>N</i> = 120), we failed to replicate this result even though the manipulated participants adjusted their mental effort as expected. We identified methodological explanations for this discrepancy in results, such as how conditions were counterbalanced in the original study, which likely produced carry-over effects, and limited visibility of participants' physiological cues. Moreover, the original study's effect vanished when re-analyzed with a more robust linear mixed model, suggesting their findings may not have been as reliable as initially thought. Our findings underscore the need for rigorous experimental designs and analyses in psychological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"8 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daily, we perform activities in the presence of others (e.g., office work). While it's well-established that the mere presence of others can influence our performance, it is less clear whether others' performance, rather than just their presence, influences us. To address this, we replicated Desender et al.'s (2016) study, Is mental effort contagious?, and conducted a second experiment to follow up on our failure to replicate their findings. Desender et al. (2016) used a modified joint Simon task where two participants performed side by side. The manipulated participant completed an easy (mostly congruent trials) and a difficult (mostly incongruent trials) block, while the neutral participant completed two neutral blocks (equal proportion of congruent and incongruent trials). They found that the neutral participant mirrored the manipulated participants' mental effort, exerting more effort when the latter performed a difficult versus an easy task. In both Experiment 1 (exact replication; N = 176) and Experiment 2 (more demanding joint Simon task; N = 120), we failed to replicate this result even though the manipulated participants adjusted their mental effort as expected. We identified methodological explanations for this discrepancy in results, such as how conditions were counterbalanced in the original study, which likely produced carry-over effects, and limited visibility of participants' physiological cues. Moreover, the original study's effect vanished when re-analyzed with a more robust linear mixed model, suggesting their findings may not have been as reliable as initially thought. Our findings underscore the need for rigorous experimental designs and analyses in psychological research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脑力劳动会传染吗?一项重复性研究。
每天,我们都要在他人面前完成活动(例如,办公室工作)。众所周知,他人的存在会影响我们的表现,但我们不太清楚是他人的表现影响了我们,还是他们的存在影响了我们。为了解决这个问题,我们复制了Desender et al.(2016)的研究,精神努力会传染吗?在我们未能复制他们的发现之后,他们又进行了第二次实验。Desender等人(2016)使用了一个改进的联合Simon任务,其中两个参与者并排执行。被操纵的参与者完成了一个简单的(大多数一致的试验)和一个困难的(大多数不一致的试验),而中立的参与者完成了两个中立的块(相同比例的一致和不一致的试验)。他们发现,中立的参与者反映了被操纵的参与者的心理努力,当后者执行困难的任务时比后者执行简单的任务时付出更多的努力。在实验1(精确复制;N = 176)和实验2(要求更高的联合Simon任务;N = 120),即使被操纵的参与者按照预期调整了他们的心理努力,我们也未能重复这一结果。我们确定了结果差异的方法学解释,例如原始研究中的条件是如何平衡的,这可能会产生结转效应,以及参与者生理线索的有限可见性。此外,当用更强大的线性混合模型重新分析时,原始研究的效果消失了,这表明他们的发现可能不像最初想象的那样可靠。我们的发现强调了在心理学研究中严格的实验设计和分析的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信