Success of amoxicillin challenges in the emergency department for children with low risk of serious reactions.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Paediatrics & child health Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/pch/pxae091
Camille Gervais, Luc Panetta, Philippe Ovetchkine, Hélène Roy, Maria Buithieu, Anne Des Roches, Stéphanie Pellerin, Evelyne D Trottier
{"title":"Success of amoxicillin challenges in the emergency department for children with low risk of serious reactions.","authors":"Camille Gervais, Luc Panetta, Philippe Ovetchkine, Hélène Roy, Maria Buithieu, Anne Des Roches, Stéphanie Pellerin, Evelyne D Trottier","doi":"10.1093/pch/pxae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to address the overdiagnosis of penicillin allergies in the pediatric population, which leads to less effective antibiotic usage. We investigated the effectiveness of standardized oral amoxicillin challenges in the emergency departments (EDs) of pediatric patients with previous reactions but a low risk for serious reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children under 18 years of age who reported allergy to any penicillin presenting to the ED of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, with a clinical requirement for amoxicillin treatment were included if their risk of anaphylaxis was judged to be low. We evaluated immediate and delayed reactions, patient demographics, the impact on resource utilization, and the number of patients no longer considered to be allergic to penicillins at the 1-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From August 2021 through April 2023, 100 children received an oral amoxicillin challenge in the ED. Among them, 93% safely received amoxicillin without an immediate reaction and were discharged with amoxicillin from the ED. Seven participants had immediate reactions which included skin rashes or vomiting, with one participant experiencing an anaphylactic reaction. Five of the seven subsequently had an amoxicillin challenge by an allergist and only the one with anaphylaxis in the ED reacted. Suspected delayed reactions were observed in 4 of the other 89 (4%) participants who could be contacted within 30 days of the challenge and consisted of skin rashes. Three of the four subsequently had an amoxicillin challenge by an allergist and one reacted. Then, two patients (2%) had confirmed allergies following suspected reactions: one patient with the anaphylactic reaction, and the other with the delayed reaction. Overall, 79/89 (89%) of patients with 30-day follow-up could have their allergy label removed without an allergist consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized oral amoxicillin challenges in low-risk pediatric ED patients allowed for the removal of penicillin allergy labels in 89% of patients reached for follow-up without an allergist consultation. This approach enhanced patient care, allowing 93% of participants to be discharged from the ED with an amoxicillin prescription. Only 2 of 100 children had proven amoxicillin allergy; another 3 had reactions but no assessment by an allergist.</p>","PeriodicalId":19730,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics & child health","volume":"30 4","pages":"273-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics & child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxae091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to address the overdiagnosis of penicillin allergies in the pediatric population, which leads to less effective antibiotic usage. We investigated the effectiveness of standardized oral amoxicillin challenges in the emergency departments (EDs) of pediatric patients with previous reactions but a low risk for serious reactions.

Methods: Children under 18 years of age who reported allergy to any penicillin presenting to the ED of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, with a clinical requirement for amoxicillin treatment were included if their risk of anaphylaxis was judged to be low. We evaluated immediate and delayed reactions, patient demographics, the impact on resource utilization, and the number of patients no longer considered to be allergic to penicillins at the 1-month follow-up.

Results: From August 2021 through April 2023, 100 children received an oral amoxicillin challenge in the ED. Among them, 93% safely received amoxicillin without an immediate reaction and were discharged with amoxicillin from the ED. Seven participants had immediate reactions which included skin rashes or vomiting, with one participant experiencing an anaphylactic reaction. Five of the seven subsequently had an amoxicillin challenge by an allergist and only the one with anaphylaxis in the ED reacted. Suspected delayed reactions were observed in 4 of the other 89 (4%) participants who could be contacted within 30 days of the challenge and consisted of skin rashes. Three of the four subsequently had an amoxicillin challenge by an allergist and one reacted. Then, two patients (2%) had confirmed allergies following suspected reactions: one patient with the anaphylactic reaction, and the other with the delayed reaction. Overall, 79/89 (89%) of patients with 30-day follow-up could have their allergy label removed without an allergist consultation.

Conclusions: Standardized oral amoxicillin challenges in low-risk pediatric ED patients allowed for the removal of penicillin allergy labels in 89% of patients reached for follow-up without an allergist consultation. This approach enhanced patient care, allowing 93% of participants to be discharged from the ED with an amoxicillin prescription. Only 2 of 100 children had proven amoxicillin allergy; another 3 had reactions but no assessment by an allergist.

阿莫西林挑战的成功在急诊科儿童低风险的严重反应。
目的:本研究旨在解决儿科人群中青霉素过敏的过度诊断,这导致抗生素的使用效果较差。我们调查了在急诊科(EDs)有既往反应但发生严重反应风险低的儿科患者中,标准化口服阿莫西林挑战的有效性。方法:在加拿大魁北克省蒙特利尔市圣贾斯汀大学医院(CHUSJ)急诊科报告对任何青霉素过敏的18岁以下儿童,如果他们的过敏反应风险被判断为低,则纳入阿莫西林治疗的临床要求。我们评估了即时和延迟反应、患者人口统计、对资源利用的影响,以及在1个月的随访中不再被认为对青霉素过敏的患者数量。结果:从2021年8月到2023年4月,100名儿童在急症室接受了口服阿莫西林治疗。其中93%的儿童安全接受了阿莫西林治疗,没有立即反应,并从急症室出院。7名参与者出现了包括皮疹或呕吐在内的立即反应,1名参与者出现了过敏反应。7人中有5人随后接受了过敏专科医生的阿莫西林挑战,只有ED中有过敏反应的人有反应。在其他89名参与者中,有4名(4%)在30天内接触到可疑的延迟反应,包括皮疹。四人中有三人随后接受了过敏专科医生的阿莫西林治疗,其中一人出现了反应。然后,两名患者(2%)在疑似反应后确诊过敏:一名患者为过敏性反应,另一名患者为延迟性反应。总的来说,在30天的随访中,79/89(89%)的患者可以在没有过敏专科医生咨询的情况下去除过敏标签。结论:在低风险儿科急诊科患者中,标准化的口服阿莫西林挑战允许89%的患者在没有过敏专科医生咨询的情况下进行随访。这种方法提高了病人的护理,允许93%的参与者带着阿莫西林处方从急诊科出院。100名儿童中只有2名被证实对阿莫西林过敏;另有3人有过敏反应,但没有经过过敏专科医生的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paediatrics & child health
Paediatrics & child health 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Paediatrics & Child Health (PCH) is the official journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and the only peer-reviewed paediatric journal in Canada. Its mission is to advocate for the health and well-being of all Canadian children and youth and to educate child and youth health professionals across the country. PCH reaches 8,000 paediatricians, family physicians and other child and youth health professionals, as well as ministers and officials in various levels of government who are involved with child and youth health policy in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信