Christine Polihronis, Paula Cloutier, Scott Robson, Kayla Beaudin, Josée Blackburn, Cindy Dawson, Mario Cappelli
{"title":"HEADS-ED Under 6: A clinician-administered mental health and developmental screening and triage tool.","authors":"Christine Polihronis, Paula Cloutier, Scott Robson, Kayla Beaudin, Josée Blackburn, Cindy Dawson, Mario Cappelli","doi":"10.1093/pch/pxae103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Communimetric screening tools convey functional impairment and action required, helping clinicians identify and communicate patient's needs and actions within a measurement framework. We examined the feasibility of using the HEADS-ED Under 6, a communimetric mental health (MH) and developmental screening and triage tool for children under 6, within 1Call1Click.ca, a regional coordinated access and navigation program in Eastern Ontario. We explored utility validity to understand how the HEADS-ED Under 6 is used to help intake workers screen, inform their level of need decision, and establish a cut-off for recommending interventions targeting moderate levels of need or higher.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospective cohort design, intake workers at 1Call1Click.ca screened all children under 6 using the HEADS-ED Under 6 from June 2021 to August 2023. Correlations and an Analysis of variance examined how total scores were associated with the level of need, and Receiver Operator Curve analysis examined sensitivity and specificity for identifying moderate levels of need or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 589 children under 6 were screened with the HEADS-ED Under 6. Utility validity was demonstrated by significant associations between level of need and HEADS-ED Under 6 domains and total scores. A total score of ≥6 supported decision-making for moderate levels of need or higher (Area Under Curve = 0.807).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HEADS-ED Under 6 is a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, that can be used by clinicians to identify the level of action/impairment, communicate the severity of MH and developmental needs, and determine the level of need for services.</p>","PeriodicalId":19730,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics & child health","volume":"30 4","pages":"312-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics & child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxae103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Communimetric screening tools convey functional impairment and action required, helping clinicians identify and communicate patient's needs and actions within a measurement framework. We examined the feasibility of using the HEADS-ED Under 6, a communimetric mental health (MH) and developmental screening and triage tool for children under 6, within 1Call1Click.ca, a regional coordinated access and navigation program in Eastern Ontario. We explored utility validity to understand how the HEADS-ED Under 6 is used to help intake workers screen, inform their level of need decision, and establish a cut-off for recommending interventions targeting moderate levels of need or higher.
Methods: Using a prospective cohort design, intake workers at 1Call1Click.ca screened all children under 6 using the HEADS-ED Under 6 from June 2021 to August 2023. Correlations and an Analysis of variance examined how total scores were associated with the level of need, and Receiver Operator Curve analysis examined sensitivity and specificity for identifying moderate levels of need or higher.
Results: In total, 589 children under 6 were screened with the HEADS-ED Under 6. Utility validity was demonstrated by significant associations between level of need and HEADS-ED Under 6 domains and total scores. A total score of ≥6 supported decision-making for moderate levels of need or higher (Area Under Curve = 0.807).
Conclusions: The HEADS-ED Under 6 is a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, that can be used by clinicians to identify the level of action/impairment, communicate the severity of MH and developmental needs, and determine the level of need for services.
期刊介绍:
Paediatrics & Child Health (PCH) is the official journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and the only peer-reviewed paediatric journal in Canada. Its mission is to advocate for the health and well-being of all Canadian children and youth and to educate child and youth health professionals across the country.
PCH reaches 8,000 paediatricians, family physicians and other child and youth health professionals, as well as ministers and officials in various levels of government who are involved with child and youth health policy in Canada.