Lithic industries, modern tools, and language: An evolutionary perspective through fMRI.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
NeuroImage Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121404
Chloé Bryche, Mathieu Lesourd, Arthur Seye, Alexandre Bluet, Natalie Uomini, Yves Rossetti, Emanuelle Reynaud, Giovanni Federico, François Osiurak
{"title":"Lithic industries, modern tools, and language: An evolutionary perspective through fMRI.","authors":"Chloé Bryche, Mathieu Lesourd, Arthur Seye, Alexandre Bluet, Natalie Uomini, Yves Rossetti, Emanuelle Reynaud, Giovanni Federico, François Osiurak","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tool use is a defining cognitive ability of the human species, relying on technical reasoning-a causal and analogical understanding of physical principles. Neuroarchaeological studies suggest that lithic tool use engaged a specialized frontoparietal network, which evolved into the left-lateralized network observed for modern tools. This network includes the left inferior parietal lobule, particularly the area PF, linked to technical reasoning, and the left inferior frontal gyrus, which is both involved in tool use and language. Since these latter two domains are based on hierarchical structuring, organizing embedded constraints, the common involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus has been proposed as evidence of a co-evolutionary trajectory. Using fMRI, we investigated whether increasing mechanical complexity modulates frontoparietal activity and whether lithic and modern tools engage a common neural network. Participants performed a tool evaluation task, in which they assessed the functionality of both tool types across three levels of complexity designed to reflect embedded constraints. Our results revealed stronger functional connectivity between the left area PF and the left pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus as mechanical complexity increased. The results also confirmed common activation for both tool types. By demonstrating that frontoparietal connectivity scales with complexity in tool evaluation, our study provides new insights into the neurocognitive foundations of tool use. These findings contribute to the broader discussion of a co-evolutionary relationship involving technical reasoning, tool making, and language, highlighting the role of hierarchical processing as a potentially shared computational principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":" ","pages":"121404"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tool use is a defining cognitive ability of the human species, relying on technical reasoning-a causal and analogical understanding of physical principles. Neuroarchaeological studies suggest that lithic tool use engaged a specialized frontoparietal network, which evolved into the left-lateralized network observed for modern tools. This network includes the left inferior parietal lobule, particularly the area PF, linked to technical reasoning, and the left inferior frontal gyrus, which is both involved in tool use and language. Since these latter two domains are based on hierarchical structuring, organizing embedded constraints, the common involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus has been proposed as evidence of a co-evolutionary trajectory. Using fMRI, we investigated whether increasing mechanical complexity modulates frontoparietal activity and whether lithic and modern tools engage a common neural network. Participants performed a tool evaluation task, in which they assessed the functionality of both tool types across three levels of complexity designed to reflect embedded constraints. Our results revealed stronger functional connectivity between the left area PF and the left pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus as mechanical complexity increased. The results also confirmed common activation for both tool types. By demonstrating that frontoparietal connectivity scales with complexity in tool evaluation, our study provides new insights into the neurocognitive foundations of tool use. These findings contribute to the broader discussion of a co-evolutionary relationship involving technical reasoning, tool making, and language, highlighting the role of hierarchical processing as a potentially shared computational principle.

石器工业、现代工具和语言:通过功能磁共振成像的进化视角。
工具的使用是人类的一种决定性的认知能力,它依赖于技术推理——对物理原理的因果和类比理解。神经考古学研究表明,石器工具的使用涉及一个专门的额顶叶网络,该网络进化为现代工具所观察到的左侧网络。这个网络包括与技术推理有关的左侧顶叶下小叶,特别是与PF有关的区域,以及与工具使用和语言有关的左侧额下回。由于后两个领域是基于层次结构,组织嵌入的约束,左额下回的共同参与已被提出作为共同进化轨迹的证据。使用功能磁共振成像,我们研究了机械复杂性的增加是否会调节额顶叶活动,以及石器和现代工具是否涉及共同的神经网络。参与者执行了一个工具评估任务,在这个任务中,他们评估了两种工具类型的功能,这些功能跨越了三个层次的复杂性,旨在反映嵌入的约束。我们的研究结果表明,随着机械复杂性的增加,左前额叶区和额下回左包部之间的功能连通性增强。结果还证实了两种工具类型的共同激活。通过证明额顶叶连接在工具评估中的复杂性,我们的研究为工具使用的神经认知基础提供了新的见解。这些发现有助于更广泛地讨论涉及技术推理、工具制造和语言的共同进化关系,突出了分层处理作为一种潜在的共享计算原理的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信