Retrospective analysis of biomechanical features in orthopedic spine disorders: a study on predictive factors for spinal abnormalities.

Q3 Medicine
Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Nouf Abdullah Alyabis, Abdulrahman Ahmed Almebki, Faisal Dhafer Alshehri, Abdulelah Mohammed Asiri, Yezeid Faisal Almohsen, Renad Fahad Almymoni, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Bayan Eid Alzahrani, Eid Khaled Algaman, Loai Saleh Albinsaad, Saud Nayef Salem Aldanyowi
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of biomechanical features in orthopedic spine disorders: a study on predictive factors for spinal abnormalities.","authors":"Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Nouf Abdullah Alyabis, Abdulrahman Ahmed Almebki, Faisal Dhafer Alshehri, Abdulelah Mohammed Asiri, Yezeid Faisal Almohsen, Renad Fahad Almymoni, Ryan Khater Alanzi, Bayan Eid Alzahrani, Eid Khaled Algaman, Loai Saleh Albinsaad, Saud Nayef Salem Aldanyowi","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abnormal spine biomechanics are associated with various orthopedic disorders. Identifying key biomechanical factors predictive of spinal abnormalities can improve diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to determine whether specific pelvic biomechanical parameters are significant predictors of spinal abnormalities. We hypothesized that patients with abnormal spine conditions exhibit distinct pelvic measurements compared to those with normal spine conditions. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,181 patient records from January to March 2024, focusing on pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic radius (PR), and spondylolisthesis. Data were collected from a centralized orthopedic patient database, which integrates de-identified records from the author's institution and affiliated facilities under the Ministry of Health. This ensured a standardized approach to data entry, with regular audits to maintain accuracy and reliability. Patients' spine conditions were classified as normal or abnormal based on imaging and clinical examinations. Descriptive statistics summarized the data, and comparative analyses were performed to differentiate between normal and abnormal groups. Decision trees and logistic regression were used to identify significant predictors of spinal abnormalities. Model validation was performed using ROC analysis and 10-fold cross-validation. Preliminary analysis found significant differences between normal and abnormal groups for various factors. Logistic regression identified pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic radius as significant predictors (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Decision trees classified 69.5% of cases accurately based on pelvic incidence thresholds. Models were validated using ROC analysis (AUC > 0.7) and 10-fold cross-validation (accuracy > 60%). This study provides valuable insights into spine biomechanics by identifying key predictors of spinal abnormalities, particularly pelvic incidence. The decision tree and logistic regression models demonstrated strong predictive capabilities. While prior studies have identified correlations between pelvic parameters and spinal disorders, this research quantifies these associations through predictive modeling, offering practical applications for early diagnosis and intervention. These findings offer the potential for improved diagnostic and treatment strategies for spine disorders. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and enhance predictive models.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"18 6","pages":"545-551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abnormal spine biomechanics are associated with various orthopedic disorders. Identifying key biomechanical factors predictive of spinal abnormalities can improve diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to determine whether specific pelvic biomechanical parameters are significant predictors of spinal abnormalities. We hypothesized that patients with abnormal spine conditions exhibit distinct pelvic measurements compared to those with normal spine conditions. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,181 patient records from January to March 2024, focusing on pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic radius (PR), and spondylolisthesis. Data were collected from a centralized orthopedic patient database, which integrates de-identified records from the author's institution and affiliated facilities under the Ministry of Health. This ensured a standardized approach to data entry, with regular audits to maintain accuracy and reliability. Patients' spine conditions were classified as normal or abnormal based on imaging and clinical examinations. Descriptive statistics summarized the data, and comparative analyses were performed to differentiate between normal and abnormal groups. Decision trees and logistic regression were used to identify significant predictors of spinal abnormalities. Model validation was performed using ROC analysis and 10-fold cross-validation. Preliminary analysis found significant differences between normal and abnormal groups for various factors. Logistic regression identified pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic radius as significant predictors (P < 0.05). Decision trees classified 69.5% of cases accurately based on pelvic incidence thresholds. Models were validated using ROC analysis (AUC > 0.7) and 10-fold cross-validation (accuracy > 60%). This study provides valuable insights into spine biomechanics by identifying key predictors of spinal abnormalities, particularly pelvic incidence. The decision tree and logistic regression models demonstrated strong predictive capabilities. While prior studies have identified correlations between pelvic parameters and spinal disorders, this research quantifies these associations through predictive modeling, offering practical applications for early diagnosis and intervention. These findings offer the potential for improved diagnostic and treatment strategies for spine disorders. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these results and enhance predictive models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨科脊柱疾病生物力学特征的回顾性分析:脊柱异常预测因素的研究。
脊柱生物力学异常与各种骨科疾病有关。确定预测脊柱异常的关键生物力学因素可以改善诊断和治疗。本研究旨在确定特定骨盆生物力学参数是否为脊柱异常的重要预测指标。我们假设,与脊柱正常的患者相比,脊柱异常的患者表现出明显的骨盆测量。回顾性分析2024年1月至3月1181例患者的记录,重点分析骨盆发生率(PI)、骨盆倾斜(PT)、腰椎前凸(LL)、骶骨斜度(SS)、骨盆半径(PR)和脊柱滑脱。数据是从一个集中的骨科患者数据库中收集的,该数据库整合了提交人所在机构和卫生部下属机构的未识别记录。这确保了数据输入的标准化方法,并定期审计以保持准确性和可靠性。根据影像学和临床检查将患者的脊柱状况分为正常和异常。描述性统计汇总数据,并进行比较分析以区分正常组和异常组。决策树和逻辑回归用于确定脊柱异常的重要预测因素。采用ROC分析和10倍交叉验证进行模型验证。初步分析发现,正常组与异常组在各种因素上存在显著差异。Logistic回归发现骨盆发生率、腰椎前凸、骶骨斜度和骨盆半径是显著的预测因子(P < 0.05)。决策树根据骨盆发生率阈值准确分类69.5%的病例。采用ROC分析(AUC > 0.7)和10倍交叉验证(准确率> 60%)对模型进行验证。该研究通过确定脊柱异常的关键预测因素,特别是骨盆发生率,为脊柱生物力学提供了有价值的见解。决策树和逻辑回归模型显示出较强的预测能力。虽然先前的研究已经确定了骨盆参数与脊柱疾病之间的相关性,但本研究通过预测建模量化了这些关联,为早期诊断和干预提供了实际应用。这些发现为改进脊柱疾病的诊断和治疗策略提供了潜力。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些结果并增强预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信