Management of Renal Transplant Ureteral Strictures: Versatility of a Robotic-Assisted Approach.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hafiz Umair Siddiqui, Dylan Isaacson, Khaled Refaai, Yi-Chia Lin, Krishnamurthi Venkatesh, Alvin Wee, Mohamed Eltemamy
{"title":"Management of Renal Transplant Ureteral Strictures: Versatility of a Robotic-Assisted Approach.","authors":"Hafiz Umair Siddiqui, Dylan Isaacson, Khaled Refaai, Yi-Chia Lin, Krishnamurthi Venkatesh, Alvin Wee, Mohamed Eltemamy","doi":"10.1089/end.2025.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Ureteral stricture after renal transplantation has a reported incidence of 1.4%-4.7%. This is classically repaired using an open surgical approach. The objective of this case series is to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of robot-assisted repair for ureteral stricture following kidney transplantation. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between November 2021 and May 2024, 10 patients underwent robot-assisted repair. Nephrostomy tubes were placed in all patients prior to the robotic repair. Patients were positioned supine with Trendelenburg tilt, and robotic ports were arranged in a W configuration. Indocyanine green was administered through the nephrostomy tube. If necessary, the pre-stented native ureter was identified and dissected. The reconstructive technique was tailored to the location and length of the stricture. Ureteral stents were placed for 4-6 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patient demographics transplant characteristics, and details of stricture repair techniques along with associated outcomes were analyzed. Strictures were located at the ureterovesical anastomosis in eight patients, at the ureteropelvic junction in one patient, and at multiple sites in one patient. Repair techniques included ureteroneocystostomy (five patients) and Boari flap reconstruction (two patients). The native ureter was used in three patients (two ureteroureterostomies and one ureteropyelostomy). A bladder hitch was performed in two patients. Median operative time was 255.5 minutes, blood loss was 62 mL, and the hospital stay was 2 days. Postoperative complications occurred in two patients, and five patients required readmission within 30 days. At 3-month follow-up, all patients had excellent renal allograft function (median serum creatinine = 1.63 mg/dL) and were nephrostomy tube- and stent-free. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Robotic repair of ureteral stricture following kidney transplantation is a safe, minimally invasive approach with reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays. This approach should be considered the primary treatment option for renal transplant ureteral strictures and included within the renal transplant surgeons' repertoire of procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stricture after renal transplantation has a reported incidence of 1.4%-4.7%. This is classically repaired using an open surgical approach. The objective of this case series is to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of robot-assisted repair for ureteral stricture following kidney transplantation. Methods: Between November 2021 and May 2024, 10 patients underwent robot-assisted repair. Nephrostomy tubes were placed in all patients prior to the robotic repair. Patients were positioned supine with Trendelenburg tilt, and robotic ports were arranged in a W configuration. Indocyanine green was administered through the nephrostomy tube. If necessary, the pre-stented native ureter was identified and dissected. The reconstructive technique was tailored to the location and length of the stricture. Ureteral stents were placed for 4-6 weeks. Results: Patient demographics transplant characteristics, and details of stricture repair techniques along with associated outcomes were analyzed. Strictures were located at the ureterovesical anastomosis in eight patients, at the ureteropelvic junction in one patient, and at multiple sites in one patient. Repair techniques included ureteroneocystostomy (five patients) and Boari flap reconstruction (two patients). The native ureter was used in three patients (two ureteroureterostomies and one ureteropyelostomy). A bladder hitch was performed in two patients. Median operative time was 255.5 minutes, blood loss was 62 mL, and the hospital stay was 2 days. Postoperative complications occurred in two patients, and five patients required readmission within 30 days. At 3-month follow-up, all patients had excellent renal allograft function (median serum creatinine = 1.63 mg/dL) and were nephrostomy tube- and stent-free. Conclusions: Robotic repair of ureteral stricture following kidney transplantation is a safe, minimally invasive approach with reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays. This approach should be considered the primary treatment option for renal transplant ureteral strictures and included within the renal transplant surgeons' repertoire of procedures.

肾移植输尿管狭窄的处理:机器人辅助方法的多功能性。
导读:肾移植后输尿管狭窄的发生率为1.4%-4.7%。典型的修复方法是开放手术。本病例系列的目的是证明机器人辅助修复肾移植后输尿管狭窄的可行性和有效性。方法:在2021年11月至2024年5月期间,10名患者接受了机器人辅助修复。在机器人修复之前,所有患者都放置了肾造瘘管。患者采用Trendelenburg倾斜仰卧位,机器人端口呈W形排列。通过肾造口管给予吲哚菁绿。如有必要,确定并解剖预先置入的输尿管。重建技术根据狭窄的位置和长度量身定制。输尿管支架放置4-6周。结果:分析了患者人口统计学、移植特征、狭窄修复技术的细节以及相关结果。8例患者狭窄位于输尿管膀胱吻合处,1例患者狭窄位于输尿管肾盂连接处,1例患者狭窄位于多个部位。修复技术包括输尿管膀胱造口术(5例)和Boari皮瓣重建(2例)。3例患者采用天然输尿管(2例输尿管输尿管造口术,1例输尿管肾盂造口术)。两例患者行膀胱结扎术。中位手术时间255.5分钟,出血量62 mL,住院2天。2例患者出现术后并发症,5例患者在30天内再次入院。在3个月的随访中,所有患者均具有良好的同种异体肾移植功能(血清肌酐中位数= 1.63 mg/dL),且无肾造口管和支架。结论:机器人修复肾移植后输尿管狭窄是一种安全、微创的方法,可减少术后疼痛和缩短住院时间。该方法应被视为肾移植输尿管狭窄的主要治疗选择,并列入肾移植外科医生的手术清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信