Assessment of the risk of developing cefepime-induced abnormal liver enzyme levels using the albumin-bilirubin score and fibrosis-4 index: a single-centre retrospective case-control study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hiroki Katsu, Yuki Asai, Takuya Iwamoto, Ryuji Hirano
{"title":"Assessment of the risk of developing cefepime-induced abnormal liver enzyme levels using the albumin-bilirubin score and fibrosis-4 index: a single-centre retrospective case-control study.","authors":"Hiroki Katsu, Yuki Asai, Takuya Iwamoto, Ryuji Hirano","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index may help predict cefepime-induced liver enzyme abnormalities, the relationship between these measures and liver enzyme abnormalities has not been elucidated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the relevance and predictive accuracy of the ALBI score and FIB-4 index for cefepime-induced liver enzyme abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective case-control study included 473 patients. The primary outcomes were cefepime-induced abnormal liver enzyme levels. Cox regression analysis was performed with male sex, cumulative dose (≥36 g), concomitant use of acetaminophen or voriconazole, alkaline phosphatase (≥238 IU/L), ALBI score (≥-1.45) and FIB-4 index (≥4.69) as explanatory variables. The predictive accuracies of the ALBI score and FIB-4 index were evaluated based on the AUC using the receiver operating characteristic curve. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between FIB-4 index ≥4.69 and FIB-4 index < 4.69 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of abnormal liver enzyme levels was 15.6% (74/473). Cox regression analysis revealed that the ALBI score (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.268-3.491; P = 0.004) and FIB-4 index (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.425-3.796; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for liver enzyme abnormalities. For all patients, the FIB-4 index (AUC: 0.629) exceeded the ALBI score (AUC: 0.530). Similar results were observed even after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The progression of liver fibrosis before cefepime administration, as assessed using the FIB-4 index, could be more useful than the ALBI score in predicting the risk of developing abnormal liver enzyme levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2742-2751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index may help predict cefepime-induced liver enzyme abnormalities, the relationship between these measures and liver enzyme abnormalities has not been elucidated.

Objectives: This study investigated the relevance and predictive accuracy of the ALBI score and FIB-4 index for cefepime-induced liver enzyme abnormalities.

Patients and methods: This single-centre retrospective case-control study included 473 patients. The primary outcomes were cefepime-induced abnormal liver enzyme levels. Cox regression analysis was performed with male sex, cumulative dose (≥36 g), concomitant use of acetaminophen or voriconazole, alkaline phosphatase (≥238 IU/L), ALBI score (≥-1.45) and FIB-4 index (≥4.69) as explanatory variables. The predictive accuracies of the ALBI score and FIB-4 index were evaluated based on the AUC using the receiver operating characteristic curve. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between FIB-4 index ≥4.69 and FIB-4 index < 4.69 groups.

Results: The incidence of abnormal liver enzyme levels was 15.6% (74/473). Cox regression analysis revealed that the ALBI score (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.268-3.491; P = 0.004) and FIB-4 index (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.425-3.796; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for liver enzyme abnormalities. For all patients, the FIB-4 index (AUC: 0.629) exceeded the ALBI score (AUC: 0.530). Similar results were observed even after propensity score matching.

Conclusions: The progression of liver fibrosis before cefepime administration, as assessed using the FIB-4 index, could be more useful than the ALBI score in predicting the risk of developing abnormal liver enzyme levels.

利用白蛋白-胆红素评分和纤维化-4指数评估头孢吡肟诱发肝酶水平异常的风险:一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究。
背景:尽管白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分和纤维化-4 (FIB-4)指数可能有助于预测头孢吡肟诱导的肝酶异常,但这些指标与肝酶异常之间的关系尚未阐明。目的:本研究探讨ALBI评分和FIB-4指数与头孢吡肟所致肝酶异常的相关性和预测准确性。患者和方法:这项单中心回顾性病例对照研究包括473例患者。主要结局是头孢吡肟引起的肝酶水平异常。以男性、累积剂量(≥36 g)、对乙酰氨基酚或伏立康唑合用、碱性磷酸酶(≥238 IU/L)、ALBI评分(≥-1.45)和FIB-4指数(≥4.69)为解释变量进行Cox回归分析。采用受试者工作特征曲线,基于AUC评价ALBI评分和FIB-4指数的预测准确性。FIB-4指数≥4.69与FIB-4指数进行1:1倾向评分匹配。结果:肝酶水平异常发生率为15.6%(74/473)。Cox回归分析显示,ALBI评分(校正风险比2.10;95% ci, 1.268-3.491;P = 0.004)和FIB-4指数(校正风险比2.33;95% ci, 1.425-3.796;P = 0.001)是肝酶异常的独立危险因素。所有患者的FIB-4指数(AUC: 0.629)均超过ALBI评分(AUC: 0.530)。即使在倾向得分匹配之后,也观察到类似的结果。结论:使用FIB-4指数评估头孢吡肟给药前肝纤维化的进展,在预测发生异常肝酶水平的风险方面可能比ALBI评分更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信