Stress reactivity during short trauma narratives in adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Oswald D Kothgassner, Sarah Macura, Andreas Goreis, Diana Klinger, Bettina Pfeffer, Sofia M Oehlke, Karin Prillinger, Johanna X Kafka, Heidi Elisabeth Zesch, Anna Felnhofer, Paul L Plener
{"title":"Stress reactivity during short trauma narratives in adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD.","authors":"Oswald D Kothgassner, Sarah Macura, Andreas Goreis, Diana Klinger, Bettina Pfeffer, Sofia M Oehlke, Karin Prillinger, Johanna X Kafka, Heidi Elisabeth Zesch, Anna Felnhofer, Paul L Plener","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2532273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Psychophysiological dysregulations and negative alterations in cognitions and mood characterize post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (C-PTSD), contributing to an increased risk of disorder persistence and chronic health problems. However, understanding the differences in physiological stress reactivity and negative cognitive-emotional patterns between adolescents with PTSD and C-PTSD remains a notable research gap.<b>Objective:</b> This study examined group differences in autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity during the sharing of a short trauma narrative, including resting and recovery phases, and compared subjective experiences of stress, shame, and guilt among adolescents with PTSD, C-PTSD, and trauma-exposed controls.<b>Methods:</b> In a repeated-measures design, 52 adolescents (14-18 years) with PTSD (<i>n</i> = 17), C-PTSD (<i>n</i> = 18), and a control group (<i>n</i> = 17) were assessed for heart rate, heart rate variability, and subjective experiences of stress, shame, and guilt during a standardized trauma interview, as well as during baseline and recovery phases.<b>Results:</b> Linear mixed-effects models revealed a significant interaction between group and time point (<i>F</i> = 4.134, <i>p</i> < .001). The C-PTSD group exhibited a significantly higher heart rate in the recovery phase compared to the PTSD (<i>p</i> = .010) and control groups (<i>p</i> = .036), alongside significantly higher subjective stress, guilt, and shame experiences. Main effects of group were identified for perceived stress (<i>F</i> = 7.543, <i>p</i> = .002), guilt (<i>F</i> = 21.779, <i>p</i> < .001), and shame (<i>F</i> = 19.309, <i>p</i> < .001), with the C-PTSD group exhibiting higher levels compared to PTSD and control groups across all conditions.<b>Conclusions:</b> Prolonged stress responses and elevated experiences of shame and guilt in adolescents with C-PTSD align with the diagnostic criteria of affective dysregulation and negative self-concept. Objective stress measures during trauma interviews may support the diagnosis of C-PTSD. Findings highlight the importance of phase-based trauma therapies that target emotional dysregulation, shame, and guilt.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2532273"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2532273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychophysiological dysregulations and negative alterations in cognitions and mood characterize post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (C-PTSD), contributing to an increased risk of disorder persistence and chronic health problems. However, understanding the differences in physiological stress reactivity and negative cognitive-emotional patterns between adolescents with PTSD and C-PTSD remains a notable research gap.Objective: This study examined group differences in autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity during the sharing of a short trauma narrative, including resting and recovery phases, and compared subjective experiences of stress, shame, and guilt among adolescents with PTSD, C-PTSD, and trauma-exposed controls.Methods: In a repeated-measures design, 52 adolescents (14-18 years) with PTSD (n = 17), C-PTSD (n = 18), and a control group (n = 17) were assessed for heart rate, heart rate variability, and subjective experiences of stress, shame, and guilt during a standardized trauma interview, as well as during baseline and recovery phases.Results: Linear mixed-effects models revealed a significant interaction between group and time point (F = 4.134, p < .001). The C-PTSD group exhibited a significantly higher heart rate in the recovery phase compared to the PTSD (p = .010) and control groups (p = .036), alongside significantly higher subjective stress, guilt, and shame experiences. Main effects of group were identified for perceived stress (F = 7.543, p = .002), guilt (F = 21.779, p < .001), and shame (F = 19.309, p < .001), with the C-PTSD group exhibiting higher levels compared to PTSD and control groups across all conditions.Conclusions: Prolonged stress responses and elevated experiences of shame and guilt in adolescents with C-PTSD align with the diagnostic criteria of affective dysregulation and negative self-concept. Objective stress measures during trauma interviews may support the diagnosis of C-PTSD. Findings highlight the importance of phase-based trauma therapies that target emotional dysregulation, shame, and guilt.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍的应激反应。
背景:心理生理失调和认知和情绪的负面改变是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(C-PTSD)的特征,有助于增加障碍持续和慢性健康问题的风险。然而,了解青少年PTSD和C-PTSD在生理应激反应和负性认知情绪模式上的差异仍然是一个值得注意的研究空白。目的:本研究考察了自主神经系统(ANS)反应性在短期创伤叙述中的组间差异,包括休息和恢复阶段,并比较了PTSD、C-PTSD和创伤暴露对照组青少年的压力、羞耻和内疚的主观体验。方法:在重复测量设计中,52名14-18岁的青少年PTSD (n = 17), C-PTSD (n = 18)和对照组(n = 17)在标准化创伤访谈期间以及基线和恢复阶段评估心率,心率变异性,压力,羞耻和内疚的主观体验。结果:线性混合效应模型显示,实验组和时间点(F = 4.134, p = 0.010)以及对照组(p = 0.036)之间存在显著的相互作用,同时主观压力、内疚和羞耻体验显著增加。结论:青少年C-PTSD患者的应激反应延长、羞耻和内疚感升高符合情感失调和负性自我概念的诊断标准。创伤访谈中的客观压力测量可能支持C-PTSD的诊断。研究结果强调了针对情绪失调、羞耻和内疚的阶段性创伤治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信