[Efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter equal to or greater than 1.5 cm].

Q3 Medicine
北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2025-08-18
J Ji, X Lin, D Pan, Z Wu, Z Xue, X Tian, S Zhang, B Wang, M Qiu
{"title":"[Efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter equal to or greater than 1.5 cm].","authors":"J Ji, X Lin, D Pan, Z Wu, Z Xue, X Tian, S Zhang, B Wang, M Qiu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap (RULL + N-trap), which is scoop-shaped, in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥ 1.5 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ureteral calculi who underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RULL) combined with N-Trap stone entrapment system at the Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, by the same surgical team between June 2021 and September 2024. A total of 364 patients were initially enrolled. After excluding 21 patients due to missing critical outcome variables, two distinct cohorts were established: 38 patients with ureteral stones measuring ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter, and 305 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter. To minimize selection bias and control for confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. This resulted in two well-balanced groups: 31 patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter and 31 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter, matched on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed between the two groups included stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included changes in renal function indicators, specifically serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and other factors like postoperative hospital stay and operative time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the matched cohort, the patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter had significantly longer operative time compared with those with smaller stones: (85.8±28.8) min <i>vs.</i> (62.4±24.6) min (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay showed no significant difference: (2.26±1.79) d <i>vs.</i> (2.03 ± 0.80) d (<i>P</i>>0.05). The stone clearance on postoperative day one was 90.3% in the study group <i>vs.</i> 100.0% in the control group (<i>P</i>>0.05). One month postoperatively, the stone clearance was 93.5% <i>vs.</i> 100.0%, respectively (<i>P</i>>0.05). Changes in SCr were (-6.58±16.10) μmol/L <i>vs</i>. (-13.70±12.50) μmol/L, and changes in GFR were (5.92±14.90) mL/(min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) <i>vs</i>. (7.47±11.20) mL/(min·1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for either renal function marker (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with N-trap is an optional method for treating ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥1.5 cm. The overall therapeutic efficacy is comparable, with the added benefit of significantly reducing the economic burden on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"57 4","pages":"676-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of rigid ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy combined with N-trap (RULL + N-trap), which is scoop-shaped, in the treatment of ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥ 1.5 cm.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ureteral calculi who underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy (RULL) combined with N-Trap stone entrapment system at the Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, by the same surgical team between June 2021 and September 2024. A total of 364 patients were initially enrolled. After excluding 21 patients due to missing critical outcome variables, two distinct cohorts were established: 38 patients with ureteral stones measuring ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter, and 305 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter. To minimize selection bias and control for confounding variables, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. This resulted in two well-balanced groups: 31 patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter and 31 patients with stones < 1.5 cm in maximum diameter, matched on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes assessed between the two groups included stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included changes in renal function indicators, specifically serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and other factors like postoperative hospital stay and operative time.

Results: In the matched cohort, the patients with stones ≥1.5 cm in maximum diameter had significantly longer operative time compared with those with smaller stones: (85.8±28.8) min vs. (62.4±24.6) min (P < 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay showed no significant difference: (2.26±1.79) d vs. (2.03 ± 0.80) d (P>0.05). The stone clearance on postoperative day one was 90.3% in the study group vs. 100.0% in the control group (P>0.05). One month postoperatively, the stone clearance was 93.5% vs. 100.0%, respectively (P>0.05). Changes in SCr were (-6.58±16.10) μmol/L vs. (-13.70±12.50) μmol/L, and changes in GFR were (5.92±14.90) mL/(min·1.73 m2) vs. (7.47±11.20) mL/(min·1.73 m2), with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups for either renal function marker (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with N-trap is an optional method for treating ureteral stones with a maximum diameter ≥1.5 cm. The overall therapeutic efficacy is comparable, with the added benefit of significantly reducing the economic burden on patients.

【硬输尿管镜激光碎石联合n阱治疗输尿管最大直径≥1.5 cm结石的疗效观察】。
目的:探讨硬输尿管镜激光碎石联合勺状n阱(RULL + n阱)治疗最大直径≥1.5 cm输尿管结石的疗效。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入北京大学第三医院泌尿外科同一外科团队于2021年6月至2024年9月接受刚性输尿管镜碎石术(RULL)联合N-Trap结石夹取系统的输尿管结石患者。最初共有364名患者入组。在排除了21例缺少关键结局变量的患者后,建立了两个不同的队列:38例输尿管结石最大直径≥1.5 cm的患者,305例输尿管结石最大直径< 1.5 cm的患者。为了减少选择偏差和控制混杂变量,采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)。这导致了两个平衡良好的组:31例结石最大直径≥1.5 cm的患者和31例结石最大直径< 1.5 cm的患者,与基线人口统计学和临床特征相匹配。两组间评估的主要结果包括结石清除。次要结局包括肾功能指标的变化,特别是血清肌酐(SCr)和估计肾小球滤过率(GFR),以及术后住院时间和手术时间等其他因素。结果:在匹配队列中,结石最大直径≥1.5 cm患者的手术时间明显高于结石较小患者,分别为(85.8±28.8)min和(62.4±24.6)min (P < 0.05)。术后住院时间(2.26±1.79)d vs(2.03±0.80)d,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。研究组术后第一天结石清除率为90.3%,对照组为100.0% (P < 0.05)。术后1个月结石清除率分别为93.5%和100.0% (P < 0.05)。SCr变化分别为(-6.58±16.10)μmol/L和(-13.70±12.50)μmol/L, GFR变化分别为(5.92±14.90)mL/(min·1.73 m2)和(7.47±11.20)mL/(min·1.73 m2),两组肾功能指标差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:输尿管镜碎石联合n阱是治疗最大直径≥1.5 cm输尿管结石的可选方法。总的治疗效果是相当的,额外的好处是显著减轻了患者的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信