Louis M Ashton, Dylan Korczynskyj, Ryan D Phillips, Stanislaw Wawrzyczek, Eddie J van Etten, Siegfried L Krauss
{"title":"Exclusion of bird pollinators impacts mating system and reduces offspring fitness in a pollination-generalist tree.","authors":"Louis M Ashton, Dylan Korczynskyj, Ryan D Phillips, Stanislaw Wawrzyczek, Eddie J van Etten, Siegfried L Krauss","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In comparison to pollinating insects and non-flying mammals (NFMs), nectarivorous birds might display behaviours leading to greater pollen carryover. Therefore, plants pollinated by birds might display higher levels of paternal diversity and outcrossing than those pollinated by insects and NFMs, with associated fitness benefits for seeds and seedlings. Here, we test these predictions using a plant where birds, insects and NFMs are all frequent visitors to flowers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experiment manipulating access to flowers of Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae) was conducted. Treatments applied to whole plants were: (1) open to all pollinators; (2) insect access, with birds and NFMs excluded; (3) NFM access, with insects and birds excluded; and (4) complete pollinator exclusion. Reproductive output was quantified in terms of fruit and seed production. The genetic consequences for offspring were tested using microsatellite markers to genotype individuals and quantify the mating system, and through field trials to quantify seedling vigour.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>When birds were excluded from flowers, maternal fitness was reduced. In comparison to open pollinated flowers, fruit set was reduced by 76 % when only NFMs could access flowers. When only insects (primarily introduced honeybees) could access flowers, the number of viable seeds per fruit was reduced by 20 % because the proportion of aborted seeds doubled, in comparison to pollination that included birds. For seedlings, heterozygosity was reduced by 22 %, outcrossing rates by 30 % and paternal diversity by 15 %, when birds were excluded. Seedling mortality was strongly associated with inbreeding, and selfing largely occurred only when birds were excluded. All parameters were lowest when only NFMs had access to flowers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although honeybees were effective pollinators of B. menziesii owing to their abundance, birds were inferred to be the most effective, with their exclusion resulting in a reduction of fecundity and offspring vigour. These negative effects were largely a consequence of selection against the products of self-pollination, which was associated with pollination by insects or NFMs. Our findings highlight how a genetic component of pollination that increases offspring fitness could favour the evolution of bird pollination.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":"887-902"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: In comparison to pollinating insects and non-flying mammals (NFMs), nectarivorous birds might display behaviours leading to greater pollen carryover. Therefore, plants pollinated by birds might display higher levels of paternal diversity and outcrossing than those pollinated by insects and NFMs, with associated fitness benefits for seeds and seedlings. Here, we test these predictions using a plant where birds, insects and NFMs are all frequent visitors to flowers.
Methods: An experiment manipulating access to flowers of Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae) was conducted. Treatments applied to whole plants were: (1) open to all pollinators; (2) insect access, with birds and NFMs excluded; (3) NFM access, with insects and birds excluded; and (4) complete pollinator exclusion. Reproductive output was quantified in terms of fruit and seed production. The genetic consequences for offspring were tested using microsatellite markers to genotype individuals and quantify the mating system, and through field trials to quantify seedling vigour.
Key results: When birds were excluded from flowers, maternal fitness was reduced. In comparison to open pollinated flowers, fruit set was reduced by 76 % when only NFMs could access flowers. When only insects (primarily introduced honeybees) could access flowers, the number of viable seeds per fruit was reduced by 20 % because the proportion of aborted seeds doubled, in comparison to pollination that included birds. For seedlings, heterozygosity was reduced by 22 %, outcrossing rates by 30 % and paternal diversity by 15 %, when birds were excluded. Seedling mortality was strongly associated with inbreeding, and selfing largely occurred only when birds were excluded. All parameters were lowest when only NFMs had access to flowers.
Conclusions: Although honeybees were effective pollinators of B. menziesii owing to their abundance, birds were inferred to be the most effective, with their exclusion resulting in a reduction of fecundity and offspring vigour. These negative effects were largely a consequence of selection against the products of self-pollination, which was associated with pollination by insects or NFMs. Our findings highlight how a genetic component of pollination that increases offspring fitness could favour the evolution of bird pollination.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide.
The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.