Shear Wave Elastography Acquisition Parameters May Bias Shear Wave Velocity Measurements

Q3 Medicine
Nicholas E. Lim, Steven Abbott, Marilyn Zelesco, Christopher J. Welman
{"title":"Shear Wave Elastography Acquisition Parameters May Bias Shear Wave Velocity Measurements","authors":"Nicholas E. Lim,&nbsp;Steven Abbott,&nbsp;Marilyn Zelesco,&nbsp;Christopher J. Welman","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effects of acquisition parameters on measured shear wave velocity (SWV) in reference phantoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>SWV were measured on three phantoms of certified SWV 0.794 m/s (Phantom 1), 1.711 m/s (Phantom 2) and 2.500 m/s (Phantom 3). Parameters examined were depth, location, region of interest (ROI) size, transducer type, pitch, frame rate and one-shot mode. Measurements were repeated 10 times for different levels of each parameter at 1.8 MHz and 2.5 MHz transducer frequency on both Canon Aplio i700 and i800 systems. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed models with Holm test for multiple comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was an interaction between acquisition depth and phantom stiffness (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) with 1 cm of depth increasing SWV by 0.037 and 0.012 m/s in Phantoms 1 and 2 but decreasing SWV by −0.049 m/s in phantom 3. Lateral acquisition box location had increased SWV compared to the middle location (left 0.048 m/s, right 0.065 m/s, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). ROI size (10 mm, 0.002 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.846) had no statistically significant effect on SWV. Transducer type at 2.5 cm depth had no significant effect on SWV (linear 0.038 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.049). Diff pitch setting of 2 had lower SWV (−0.030 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Frame rate had no statistically significant effect on SWV (1 frame per second increasing SWV by 0.037 m/s, <i>p</i> = 0.025). One-shot mode had higher SWV than continuous mode by 0.042 m/s (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Acquisition parameters can have statistically significant effects on measured SWV and may bias measured SWV due to cumulative effects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the effects of acquisition parameters on measured shear wave velocity (SWV) in reference phantoms.

Methods

SWV were measured on three phantoms of certified SWV 0.794 m/s (Phantom 1), 1.711 m/s (Phantom 2) and 2.500 m/s (Phantom 3). Parameters examined were depth, location, region of interest (ROI) size, transducer type, pitch, frame rate and one-shot mode. Measurements were repeated 10 times for different levels of each parameter at 1.8 MHz and 2.5 MHz transducer frequency on both Canon Aplio i700 and i800 systems. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed models with Holm test for multiple comparisons.

Results

There was an interaction between acquisition depth and phantom stiffness (p < 0.001) with 1 cm of depth increasing SWV by 0.037 and 0.012 m/s in Phantoms 1 and 2 but decreasing SWV by −0.049 m/s in phantom 3. Lateral acquisition box location had increased SWV compared to the middle location (left 0.048 m/s, right 0.065 m/s, p < 0.001). ROI size (10 mm, 0.002 m/s, p = 0.846) had no statistically significant effect on SWV. Transducer type at 2.5 cm depth had no significant effect on SWV (linear 0.038 m/s, p = 0.049). Diff pitch setting of 2 had lower SWV (−0.030 m/s, p = 0.002). Frame rate had no statistically significant effect on SWV (1 frame per second increasing SWV by 0.037 m/s, p = 0.025). One-shot mode had higher SWV than continuous mode by 0.042 m/s (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Acquisition parameters can have statistically significant effects on measured SWV and may bias measured SWV due to cumulative effects.

横波弹性成像采集参数可能会影响横波速度测量
目的研究不同采集参数对参考影中横波速度的影响。方法对三种经认证的SWV进行测量,分别为0.794 m/s (Phantom 1)、1.711 m/s (Phantom 2)和2.500 m/s (Phantom 3)。检测的参数包括深度、位置、感兴趣区域(ROI)大小、传感器类型、间距、帧率和一次拍摄模式。在佳能Aplio i700和i800系统上,在1.8 MHz和2.5 MHz换能器频率下,对每个参数的不同水平重复测量10次。采用线性混合模型进行统计分析,采用Holm检验进行多重比较。结果采集深度与幻像刚度之间存在交互作用(p < 0.001), 1 cm深度使幻像1和2的SWV分别增加0.037和0.012 m/s,使幻像3的SWV减少- 0.049 m/s。与中间位置相比,横向采集盒位置增加了SWV(左0.048 m/s,右0.065 m/s, p < 0.001)。ROI大小(10 mm, 0.002 m/s, p = 0.846)对SWV的影响无统计学意义。2.5 cm深度换能器类型对SWV无显著影响(线性0.038 m/s, p = 0.049)。差异音高设置2的SWV较低(- 0.030 m/s, p = 0.002)。帧率对SWV无显著影响(每秒1帧使SWV增加0.037 m/s, p = 0.025)。单次射击模式的SWV比连续模式高0.042 m/s (p < 0.001)。结论获取参数对测量的SWV有显著的影响,并可能由于累积效应而使测量的SWV产生偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信