Modeling particle size distribution for subaqueous soil survey applications

Joseph V. Manetta, Mark H. Stolt
{"title":"Modeling particle size distribution for subaqueous soil survey applications","authors":"Joseph V. Manetta,&nbsp;Mark H. Stolt","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coastal environments face a growing number of challenges as a result of a changing climate (e.g., sea level rise, flooding, and erosion). In response, intertidal and subaqueous soils (SAS) are being mapped to provide a soil resource inventory for use and management decisions. An essential part of any soil resource inventory is particle size distribution (PSD) analysis. Coastal soils have elevated levels of salts and sulfides that can complicate PSD analysis, requiring time-intensive pretreatments. We tested a regression model to reduce reliance on labor-intensive methods for PSD analysis. Analysis of 257 SAS samples revealed a strong sand–silt relationship (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.975), allowing for accurate silt and clay prediction from sand content. For samples with &gt;40% sand (70% of the 257 samples), average absolute residuals of predicted silt ranged from 0.80% to 3.58%. Randomized iterative testing (10,000 iterations) showed that as few as 50 samples of the original 257 could be used to develop a model to provide PSD data with &lt;4% absolute error for predicting silt for samples with &gt;40% sand. Accuracy of the model declined for samples with ≤40% sand, especially &lt;20% sand where average absolute residuals ranged from 7% to 8%. We hypothesized that diatom skeletons disrupted the sand–silt relationship in the silt-dominated samples, which contained as many as 9% diatoms. The regression model developed in this study offers a faster, more time- and cost-effective alternative for determining PSD analysis in SAS with &gt;40% sand, aiding large-scale soil survey efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal environments face a growing number of challenges as a result of a changing climate (e.g., sea level rise, flooding, and erosion). In response, intertidal and subaqueous soils (SAS) are being mapped to provide a soil resource inventory for use and management decisions. An essential part of any soil resource inventory is particle size distribution (PSD) analysis. Coastal soils have elevated levels of salts and sulfides that can complicate PSD analysis, requiring time-intensive pretreatments. We tested a regression model to reduce reliance on labor-intensive methods for PSD analysis. Analysis of 257 SAS samples revealed a strong sand–silt relationship (p < 0.0001; r2 = 0.975), allowing for accurate silt and clay prediction from sand content. For samples with >40% sand (70% of the 257 samples), average absolute residuals of predicted silt ranged from 0.80% to 3.58%. Randomized iterative testing (10,000 iterations) showed that as few as 50 samples of the original 257 could be used to develop a model to provide PSD data with <4% absolute error for predicting silt for samples with >40% sand. Accuracy of the model declined for samples with ≤40% sand, especially <20% sand where average absolute residuals ranged from 7% to 8%. We hypothesized that diatom skeletons disrupted the sand–silt relationship in the silt-dominated samples, which contained as many as 9% diatoms. The regression model developed in this study offers a faster, more time- and cost-effective alternative for determining PSD analysis in SAS with >40% sand, aiding large-scale soil survey efforts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

水下土壤测量应用的粒度分布建模
由于气候变化,沿海环境面临着越来越多的挑战(如海平面上升、洪水和侵蚀)。为此,正在绘制潮间带和水下土壤(SAS)图,以便为使用和管理决策提供土壤资源清单。任何土壤资源调查的一个重要组成部分是粒度分布(PSD)分析。沿海土壤的盐和硫化物含量升高,这可能使PSD分析复杂化,需要花费大量时间进行预处理。我们测试了一个回归模型,以减少对劳动密集型的PSD分析方法的依赖。对257个SAS样品的分析揭示了强烈的砂粉关系(p <;0.0001;R2 = 0.975),可以通过砂含量准确预测粉土和粘土。对于含砂40%的样品(257个样品中的70%),预测粉砂的平均绝对残差在0.80% ~ 3.58%之间。随机迭代测试(10,000次迭代)表明,在原始的257个样本中,只需要50个样本就可以建立一个模型,该模型可以提供PSD数据,对于含砂量为40%的样本,预测淤泥的绝对误差为4%。当含砂量≤40%时,模型的精度下降,特别是含砂量≤20%时,平均绝对残差在7%到8%之间。我们假设硅藻骨架破坏了以粉砂为主的样品中的砂粉关系,其中硅藻含量高达9%。本研究中开发的回归模型提供了一种更快、更省时、更具成本效益的替代方案,用于确定含有40%沙子的SAS的PSD分析,有助于大规模的土壤调查工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信