Wenjing He , Zhengjie Ni , Muxin Liu , Minjie Cui , Ling Shi , Yibo Zhao , Lanjun Zhang , Zhirui Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of four preparation methods and electrochemical properties of walnut shell-based activated carbon","authors":"Wenjing He , Zhengjie Ni , Muxin Liu , Minjie Cui , Ling Shi , Yibo Zhao , Lanjun Zhang , Zhirui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes four biomass-based activated carbon (AC) preparation methods to evaluate the effects of preparation processes (one/two-step process), heating rate, and carbonization temperature on the product yield, as well as on the structural properties and electrochemical performance of AC. The results reveal that the one-step process, a high heating rate, and an appropriate carbonization temperature help to produce AC with a large specific surface area (SSA) and good electrochemical performance. However, these conditions may result in a partial loss of AC yield. Among the four preparation methods, the one-step process (M1) — fast pyrolysis at 650 °C with in-situ activation at 700 °C for 2 h — achieved AC with an SSA of 744.8 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>, the highest specific capacitance of 265.62 F g<sup>−1</sup> at 0.5 A g<sup>−1</sup>, and a capacitance retention rate of 93.41 % after 5000 cycles at 2 A g<sup>−1</sup>. The first comparison of the economics of different methods was conducted, and the results further revealed that M1 is the optimal process due to its lowest consumption of time, energy, and raw materials, along with the minimum comprehensive cost index, when preparing electrode materials with equivalent capacitance. This method provides a novel and efficient strategy for advancing biomass processing technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 107315"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165237025003687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study proposes four biomass-based activated carbon (AC) preparation methods to evaluate the effects of preparation processes (one/two-step process), heating rate, and carbonization temperature on the product yield, as well as on the structural properties and electrochemical performance of AC. The results reveal that the one-step process, a high heating rate, and an appropriate carbonization temperature help to produce AC with a large specific surface area (SSA) and good electrochemical performance. However, these conditions may result in a partial loss of AC yield. Among the four preparation methods, the one-step process (M1) — fast pyrolysis at 650 °C with in-situ activation at 700 °C for 2 h — achieved AC with an SSA of 744.8 m2 g−1, the highest specific capacitance of 265.62 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1, and a capacitance retention rate of 93.41 % after 5000 cycles at 2 A g−1. The first comparison of the economics of different methods was conducted, and the results further revealed that M1 is the optimal process due to its lowest consumption of time, energy, and raw materials, along with the minimum comprehensive cost index, when preparing electrode materials with equivalent capacitance. This method provides a novel and efficient strategy for advancing biomass processing technologies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (JAAP) is devoted to the publication of papers dealing with innovative applications of pyrolysis processes, the characterization of products related to pyrolysis reactions, and investigations of reaction mechanism. To be considered by JAAP, a manuscript should present significant progress in these topics. The novelty must be satisfactorily argued in the cover letter. A manuscript with a cover letter to the editor not addressing the novelty is likely to be rejected without review.