Álvaro Darriba , Hamdi Habacha , Yang Seok Cho , Florian Waszak
{"title":"ERP prediction error responses under temporal constraints","authors":"Álvaro Darriba , Hamdi Habacha , Yang Seok Cho , Florian Waszak","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anticipating future events is fundamental to adaptive behaviour. This study used EEG to examine how the brain processes multiple concurrent predictions under time constraints. On each trial, participants heard two auditory cues predicting different features (tilt and spatial frequency) of an upcoming visual stimulus (a Gabor patch), with cues presented either 200 ms or 1000 ms apart. The visual stimulus could either match both predicted features, violate both, or match only one while violating the other. We analysed event-related potentials (ERPs) to the Gabor patch to assess prediction error (PE) responses. Violations of the first cue’s prediction consistently elicited robust N2b responses, even when the second cue’s prediction was accurate. Violations of both cues produced similarly strong N2b amplitudes, while isolated violations of the second cue had no significant effect. No differences emerged between short and long cue intervals, suggesting that the temporal gap did not modulate PE processing. These results point to a bottleneck in integrating sequential predictions, with earlier cues dominating PE-related EEG responses under temporal constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1865 ","pages":"Article 149867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325004287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anticipating future events is fundamental to adaptive behaviour. This study used EEG to examine how the brain processes multiple concurrent predictions under time constraints. On each trial, participants heard two auditory cues predicting different features (tilt and spatial frequency) of an upcoming visual stimulus (a Gabor patch), with cues presented either 200 ms or 1000 ms apart. The visual stimulus could either match both predicted features, violate both, or match only one while violating the other. We analysed event-related potentials (ERPs) to the Gabor patch to assess prediction error (PE) responses. Violations of the first cue’s prediction consistently elicited robust N2b responses, even when the second cue’s prediction was accurate. Violations of both cues produced similarly strong N2b amplitudes, while isolated violations of the second cue had no significant effect. No differences emerged between short and long cue intervals, suggesting that the temporal gap did not modulate PE processing. These results point to a bottleneck in integrating sequential predictions, with earlier cues dominating PE-related EEG responses under temporal constraints.
期刊介绍:
An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences.
Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed.
With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.