Evaluating the urban flood risk mitigation and cost-effectiveness of green roofs: A case study of Kunming, China

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shouquan Yang , Lihong Yang , Jing Tan , Zhiyong Yuan , Zhiqiang Xie , Xingfeng Fu , Zhengtao Peng , Tong Xu , Jianglong He , Lei Zhao , Shihan Bai , Songyun Cui
{"title":"Evaluating the urban flood risk mitigation and cost-effectiveness of green roofs: A case study of Kunming, China","authors":"Shouquan Yang ,&nbsp;Lihong Yang ,&nbsp;Jing Tan ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Xie ,&nbsp;Xingfeng Fu ,&nbsp;Zhengtao Peng ,&nbsp;Tong Xu ,&nbsp;Jianglong He ,&nbsp;Lei Zhao ,&nbsp;Shihan Bai ,&nbsp;Songyun Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a key sponge city infrastructure, green roofs serve as an effective source control measure for mitigating increasingly frequent urban flooding. Nevertheless, studies remain scarce regarding post-implementation flood risk variations and cost-benefit analysis of green roof retrofits. This study adopted a combination of monitoring and simulation methods to calibrate the parameters of green roofs. We further employed evaluation metrics and scenario simulations to analyze their impact on urban flood risk, supplemented by a life cycle cost-benefit assessment focusing on runoff regulation and flood damage reduction. Results indicate that: (1) The implemented green roofs effectively reduced runoff from rainfall events below 21 mm, with the calibrated model showing high validity (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient = 0.829). (2) Green roofs reduce overall runoff and surface water accumulation, thereby lowering flood risks. But its effectiveness wanes as rainfall increases. Under moderate, heavy, and storm rainfall conditions, the reduction in runoff in high-risk areas was 58.94 %, 8.99 %, and 2.86 %. (3) Over a 30-year lifecycle, the cost of implementing 0.97 km<sup>2</sup> of green roofs is about 149.45 million dollars, while the benefits from water regulation and flood loss reduction amount to approximately 511.14 million dollars, yielding a cost-effectiveness ratio of 0.2924.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105738"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242092500562X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a key sponge city infrastructure, green roofs serve as an effective source control measure for mitigating increasingly frequent urban flooding. Nevertheless, studies remain scarce regarding post-implementation flood risk variations and cost-benefit analysis of green roof retrofits. This study adopted a combination of monitoring and simulation methods to calibrate the parameters of green roofs. We further employed evaluation metrics and scenario simulations to analyze their impact on urban flood risk, supplemented by a life cycle cost-benefit assessment focusing on runoff regulation and flood damage reduction. Results indicate that: (1) The implemented green roofs effectively reduced runoff from rainfall events below 21 mm, with the calibrated model showing high validity (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient = 0.829). (2) Green roofs reduce overall runoff and surface water accumulation, thereby lowering flood risks. But its effectiveness wanes as rainfall increases. Under moderate, heavy, and storm rainfall conditions, the reduction in runoff in high-risk areas was 58.94 %, 8.99 %, and 2.86 %. (3) Over a 30-year lifecycle, the cost of implementing 0.97 km2 of green roofs is about 149.45 million dollars, while the benefits from water regulation and flood loss reduction amount to approximately 511.14 million dollars, yielding a cost-effectiveness ratio of 0.2924.
绿色屋顶的城市洪水风险缓解与成本效益评估——以昆明为例
屋顶绿化作为海绵城市的重要基础设施,是缓解日益频繁的城市洪涝灾害的有效源头控制措施。然而,关于实施后的洪水风险变化和绿色屋顶改造的成本效益分析的研究仍然很少。本研究采用监测与模拟相结合的方法对绿色屋顶的参数进行标定。我们进一步采用评估指标和情景模拟来分析它们对城市洪水风险的影响,并辅以以径流调节和减少洪水破坏为重点的生命周期成本效益评估。结果表明:(1)绿化屋顶有效减少了21 mm以下降雨径流,校正后的模型具有较高的效度(Nash-Sutcliffe效率系数= 0.829)。(2)绿化屋顶减少了总体径流和地表水的积累,从而降低了洪水风险。但随着降雨量的增加,其有效性会减弱。在中等、强、暴雨条件下,高风险区径流量减少率分别为58.94%、8.99%和2.86%。(3)在30年的生命周期中,实施0.97 km2绿色屋顶的成本约为1.4945亿美元,而水资源调节和减少洪水损失的收益约为5.1114亿美元,成本效益比为0.2924。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信