A semi-systematic literature review for improving assessment goals, practices, and strategies for promoting computational empowerment in K-12 education

Q1 Social Sciences
Yu-Yu Liu , Christian Dindler , Ole S. Iversen , Yasmin B. Kafai
{"title":"A semi-systematic literature review for improving assessment goals, practices, and strategies for promoting computational empowerment in K-12 education","authors":"Yu-Yu Liu ,&nbsp;Christian Dindler ,&nbsp;Ole S. Iversen ,&nbsp;Yasmin B. Kafai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) research has shown growing interest in Computational Empowerment (CE), yet there remains a lack of focus on assessment practices that can substantiate its outcomes. This paper presents a semi-systematic review to examine current approaches to assessing CE in CCI, investigate how these assessments connect to learning activities, and propose research directions for improving CE assessments. Our findings reveal that most studies are situated in formal educational settings and primarily aim to evaluate proposed technologies or learning models, but often with limited educator involvement. Assessment methods primarily rely on observations, feedback, reflection, and self-reports, but many do not specify theoretical frameworks. In response, we advocate for recentering participatory design in CE by fostering sustainable collaboration with educators. We propose strengthening CE assessment practices by building upon exemplary studies and focusing on three key areas aligned with the pillars of learning design: (1) refining and advancing CE learning goals, (2) integrating learning theories into assessment design, and (3) developing activities grounded in formative assessment principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100766"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212868925000479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) research has shown growing interest in Computational Empowerment (CE), yet there remains a lack of focus on assessment practices that can substantiate its outcomes. This paper presents a semi-systematic review to examine current approaches to assessing CE in CCI, investigate how these assessments connect to learning activities, and propose research directions for improving CE assessments. Our findings reveal that most studies are situated in formal educational settings and primarily aim to evaluate proposed technologies or learning models, but often with limited educator involvement. Assessment methods primarily rely on observations, feedback, reflection, and self-reports, but many do not specify theoretical frameworks. In response, we advocate for recentering participatory design in CE by fostering sustainable collaboration with educators. We propose strengthening CE assessment practices by building upon exemplary studies and focusing on three key areas aligned with the pillars of learning design: (1) refining and advancing CE learning goals, (2) integrating learning theories into assessment design, and (3) developing activities grounded in formative assessment principles.
一篇半系统的文献综述,旨在改善K-12教育中促进计算赋权的评估目标、实践和策略
儿童计算机交互(CCI)研究显示出对计算赋权(CE)的兴趣越来越大,但仍然缺乏对可以证实其结果的评估实践的关注。本文提出了一项半系统的综述,以检查目前评估CCI中CE的方法,调查这些评估如何与学习活动联系起来,并提出改进CE评估的研究方向。我们的研究结果表明,大多数研究都是在正规的教育环境中进行的,主要目的是评估所提出的技术或学习模式,但往往只有有限的教育者参与。评估方法主要依赖于观察、反馈、反思和自我报告,但许多方法没有明确的理论框架。作为回应,我们提倡通过促进与教育工作者的可持续合作,将参与式设计重新引入电子教育。我们建议在示范研究的基础上,重点关注与学习设计支柱相一致的三个关键领域,以加强环境教育评估实践:(1)完善和推进环境教育学习目标;(2)将学习理论融入评估设计;(3)开展基于形成性评估原则的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信