Robin McClave MS, CHES, Anastasia Snelling PhD, RD, Caroline Krekorian BS, Brogan Madden MS, CHES, Javad Rajabi MS, Brooke Wayne MS
{"title":"The DC Food Retail Landscape Assessment: An Evaluation of Access to Healthy and Unhealthy Foods by Neighborhood and Retail Outlet Type","authors":"Robin McClave MS, CHES, Anastasia Snelling PhD, RD, Caroline Krekorian BS, Brogan Madden MS, CHES, Javad Rajabi MS, Brooke Wayne MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Food insecurity affects over 13% of U.S. households, with rates exceeding 33% among those with incomes below 185% of the federal poverty level (Rabbitt et al., 2024). In Washington, DC, only four of the city’s 68 full-service grocery stores are in the lowest income wards (Jones & Simpson, 2023). Limited access to affordable, healthy food significantly exacerbates health disparities. Research on the food retail environment can provide insight into barriers to healthy diets, inform retail food policy, and establish a benchmark for healthy food environments and evaluation moving forward.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Examine differences in access and amount of shelf space dedicated to selling healthy and unhealthy foods across DC.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included128 food retail outlets across DC. Stores were categorized as: full-service grocery stores, small/medium food stores, Healthy Corner Stores, convenience stores, or drug stores. Data collection measured the shelf length/type dedicated to five healthy food categories and three unhealthy food categories. Shelf types included aisles, endcaps, floor displays and checkouts. Researchers measured exposure by documenting cumulative shelf space and number of locations where items appear.</div></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><div>Analyses included: 1) linear shelf space dedicated to healthy/unhealthy foods across store types; and 2) shelf space variation within store types by geography. Means, standard deviations and ratios across wards/store types were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All store types allocated more space to unhealthy foods with ratios below 1.0. A ratio of 1.0 would indicate an equal amount of space dedicated to healthy and unhealthy food. Full-service grocery stores (n=19) had the greatest ratio at 0.3, indicating three feet of shelf space for healthy foods for every seven feet of shelf space for unhealthy foods. Drug stores (n=25) had the least amount of space for healthy foods with a ratio of 0.006. Unhealthy foods were more prominent at endcaps and checkouts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This data shows disparities in availability of healthy and unhealthy foods within food retail outlets by store type. This research can guide statewide programming and policies to improve food retail environments.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>SNAP-Ed</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"57 8","pages":"Page S9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404625001393","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Food insecurity affects over 13% of U.S. households, with rates exceeding 33% among those with incomes below 185% of the federal poverty level (Rabbitt et al., 2024). In Washington, DC, only four of the city’s 68 full-service grocery stores are in the lowest income wards (Jones & Simpson, 2023). Limited access to affordable, healthy food significantly exacerbates health disparities. Research on the food retail environment can provide insight into barriers to healthy diets, inform retail food policy, and establish a benchmark for healthy food environments and evaluation moving forward.
Objective
Examine differences in access and amount of shelf space dedicated to selling healthy and unhealthy foods across DC.
Study Design, Settings, Participants
This cross-sectional study included128 food retail outlets across DC. Stores were categorized as: full-service grocery stores, small/medium food stores, Healthy Corner Stores, convenience stores, or drug stores. Data collection measured the shelf length/type dedicated to five healthy food categories and three unhealthy food categories. Shelf types included aisles, endcaps, floor displays and checkouts. Researchers measured exposure by documenting cumulative shelf space and number of locations where items appear.
Measurable Outcome/Analysis
Analyses included: 1) linear shelf space dedicated to healthy/unhealthy foods across store types; and 2) shelf space variation within store types by geography. Means, standard deviations and ratios across wards/store types were calculated.
Results
All store types allocated more space to unhealthy foods with ratios below 1.0. A ratio of 1.0 would indicate an equal amount of space dedicated to healthy and unhealthy food. Full-service grocery stores (n=19) had the greatest ratio at 0.3, indicating three feet of shelf space for healthy foods for every seven feet of shelf space for unhealthy foods. Drug stores (n=25) had the least amount of space for healthy foods with a ratio of 0.006. Unhealthy foods were more prominent at endcaps and checkouts.
Conclusions
This data shows disparities in availability of healthy and unhealthy foods within food retail outlets by store type. This research can guide statewide programming and policies to improve food retail environments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas.
The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.