{"title":"Ultrasound-based machine learning models for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis","authors":"Parya Valizadeh , Payam Jannatdoust , Niloofar Moradi , Shirin Yaghoobpoor , Sajjad Toofani , Nazanin Rafiei , Farzan Moodi , Hamed Ghorani , Arvin Arian","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women globally, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) serving as a critical pre-surgical intervention. Ultrasound-based radiomics and machine learning (ML) models offer potential for early prediction of NAC response, aiding personalized treatment strategies. This study systematically reviews the efficacy of ultrasound-based ML models in predicting NAC response in breast cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to August 30, 2023. Studies developing ultrasound-based radiomics or deep learning (DL) models to predict NAC response were include. Models for complete and partial response were analyzed separately.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two studies were included. For models predicting complete response, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 85.1 % (95 % CI: 79.2–89.6 %), 85.8 % (95 % CI: 76.7–91.8 %), and 86 % (95 % CI: 82 %–94 %), respectively for internal validation and 82.9 % (95 % CI: 76.2 % - 88.1 %), 89.4 % (95 % CI: 84.7 %–92.9 %), and 93 % (95 % CI: 82 %–94 %), respectively for external validation. For partial response, analysis could only be performed on internal validation and the pooled sensitivity was 87.5 % (95 % CI: 85.1–89.6 %) with pooled specificity of 82.3 % (95 % CI: 75.6–87.5 %), and pooled AUC of 88 % (95 % CI: 85 %–92 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ultrasound-based ML models show strong potential for predicting NAC response in breast cancer, with delta radiomics enhancing predictive accuracy. Further research is needed to develop clinically generalizable models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 110574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims
Breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women globally, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) serving as a critical pre-surgical intervention. Ultrasound-based radiomics and machine learning (ML) models offer potential for early prediction of NAC response, aiding personalized treatment strategies. This study systematically reviews the efficacy of ultrasound-based ML models in predicting NAC response in breast cancer patients.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to August 30, 2023. Studies developing ultrasound-based radiomics or deep learning (DL) models to predict NAC response were include. Models for complete and partial response were analyzed separately.
Results
Twenty-two studies were included. For models predicting complete response, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 85.1 % (95 % CI: 79.2–89.6 %), 85.8 % (95 % CI: 76.7–91.8 %), and 86 % (95 % CI: 82 %–94 %), respectively for internal validation and 82.9 % (95 % CI: 76.2 % - 88.1 %), 89.4 % (95 % CI: 84.7 %–92.9 %), and 93 % (95 % CI: 82 %–94 %), respectively for external validation. For partial response, analysis could only be performed on internal validation and the pooled sensitivity was 87.5 % (95 % CI: 85.1–89.6 %) with pooled specificity of 82.3 % (95 % CI: 75.6–87.5 %), and pooled AUC of 88 % (95 % CI: 85 %–92 %).
Conclusion
Ultrasound-based ML models show strong potential for predicting NAC response in breast cancer, with delta radiomics enhancing predictive accuracy. Further research is needed to develop clinically generalizable models.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology