The moderating impact of community-built environments on a behavior intervention program to increase health outcomes for insufficiently active adults

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Natália Santos , Adalberto A.S. Lopes , Tânia Benedetti , Cassiano R. Rech
{"title":"The moderating impact of community-built environments on a behavior intervention program to increase health outcomes for insufficiently active adults","authors":"Natália Santos ,&nbsp;Adalberto A.S. Lopes ,&nbsp;Tânia Benedetti ,&nbsp;Cassiano R. Rech","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to verify if the benefits obtained in behavioral variables by intervention participants of the “Active Life Improving Health” (VAMOS) program were associated with access to places for physical activity and healthy eating.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Street network buffer areas of 500- and 1000-m were created around residences of VAMOS’ participants, healthy adults older than 18 years old (n = 125). Built environment's exposure variables were accounted for by the frequency of physical activity and healthy eating places in each buffer, and geo-referenced in Google Earth. Behavior variables focus on the primary health outcomes of VAMOS (i.e., sedentary behavior, moderate to vigorous physical activity, quality of life). Geospatial software was used to develop the walkability index in participants' census tracts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There are significant interactions (p &lt; 0.05) on how the presence of Leisure Public Spaces at 500-m decreased sedentary behaviors (p = 0.046) and waist circumference (p = 0.038) and increased physical activity levels (p = 0.001) in participants from baseline to the end of the program at 12 weeks. Walkability indices did not impact behavior change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Having Leisure Public Spaces and food retailers that sell healthy foods within 500-m of participants can influence positive behavior change. Walkability levels did not directly impact behavior change, which could be a result of how participants perceive walkability in their communities, and what their threshold is for considering spaces unfit or unsafe for walking. Future studies should consider locations post-COVID and assess the perception of participants on how they move around their communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 102156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study is to verify if the benefits obtained in behavioral variables by intervention participants of the “Active Life Improving Health” (VAMOS) program were associated with access to places for physical activity and healthy eating.

Methods

Street network buffer areas of 500- and 1000-m were created around residences of VAMOS’ participants, healthy adults older than 18 years old (n = 125). Built environment's exposure variables were accounted for by the frequency of physical activity and healthy eating places in each buffer, and geo-referenced in Google Earth. Behavior variables focus on the primary health outcomes of VAMOS (i.e., sedentary behavior, moderate to vigorous physical activity, quality of life). Geospatial software was used to develop the walkability index in participants' census tracts.

Results

There are significant interactions (p < 0.05) on how the presence of Leisure Public Spaces at 500-m decreased sedentary behaviors (p = 0.046) and waist circumference (p = 0.038) and increased physical activity levels (p = 0.001) in participants from baseline to the end of the program at 12 weeks. Walkability indices did not impact behavior change.

Conclusions

Having Leisure Public Spaces and food retailers that sell healthy foods within 500-m of participants can influence positive behavior change. Walkability levels did not directly impact behavior change, which could be a result of how participants perceive walkability in their communities, and what their threshold is for considering spaces unfit or unsafe for walking. Future studies should consider locations post-COVID and assess the perception of participants on how they move around their communities.
社区建设环境对行为干预计划的调节作用,以提高缺乏运动的成年人的健康结果
目的验证“积极生活改善健康”(VAMOS)项目干预参与者在行为变量中获得的收益是否与获得体育活动场所和健康饮食有关。方法在VAMOS参与者(125名18岁以上的健康成年人)住所周围建立500米和1000米的街道网络缓冲区。建筑环境的暴露变量由每个缓冲区中身体活动和健康饮食场所的频率来解释,并在谷歌Earth中进行地理参考。行为变量关注VAMOS的主要健康结果(即久坐行为、中度到剧烈的身体活动、生活质量)。使用地理空间软件在参与者的人口普查区开发步行指数。结果存在显著的相互作用(p <;从基线到12周项目结束,500米的休闲公共空间的存在如何减少参与者的久坐行为(p = 0.046)和腰围(p = 0.038),并增加身体活动水平(p = 0.001)。可步行性指数对行为变化没有影响。结论在参与者500米范围内增加休闲公共空间和销售健康食品的食品零售商可以影响参与者的积极行为改变。可步行性水平并没有直接影响行为的改变,这可能是参与者如何看待他们社区的可步行性,以及他们认为不适合或不安全的空间的阈值。未来的研究应考虑covid后的地点,并评估参与者对他们如何在社区中移动的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信