{"title":"Assessing the effectiveness of signs to change littering behavior in a Norwegian national park","authors":"Sofie Kjendlie Selvaag , Marianne Evju","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2025.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Littering in natural areas disrupts ecosystems and diminishes visitor experiences, posing a persistent challenge. This study explored how communication through signage could effectively reduce littering behavior. We tested two signage interventions at six campsites near Røvoltjønnan Lake in Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, using insights from visitor interviews and observations structured by the COM-B and the elaboration-likelihood models. Field experiments conducted in summer 2023 measured effectiveness through waste mapping, visitor surveys, and trail counters. Daily litter at the campsites ranged from 0 to 16 pieces, with an average of 13 pieces during the control period. Treatment period 1 (Sign 1), reduced this to 7 pieces, and treatment period 2 (Sign 2) to 4 pieces. Overall, there was a 59 % reduction in litter at campsites when the signs were implemented compared to the control period. While Sign 2, with larger font size and image, appeared more effective in reducing littering, the difference between the signs was not statistically significant, likely due to limited sample size. Most visitors already exhibited responsible behavior by taking their waste home and expressing a strong belief in the importance of not littering, suggesting that explanations and justifications included in Sign 1 were unnecessary. The signs likely served as reminders, increasing attentiveness and encouraging visitors to take all their waste with them, with some picking up litter left by others. These findings highlight the importance of targeted communication in fostering stewardship and providing actionable insights for park managers to reduce environmental impacts and promote sustainable visitor behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078025000763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Littering in natural areas disrupts ecosystems and diminishes visitor experiences, posing a persistent challenge. This study explored how communication through signage could effectively reduce littering behavior. We tested two signage interventions at six campsites near Røvoltjønnan Lake in Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, using insights from visitor interviews and observations structured by the COM-B and the elaboration-likelihood models. Field experiments conducted in summer 2023 measured effectiveness through waste mapping, visitor surveys, and trail counters. Daily litter at the campsites ranged from 0 to 16 pieces, with an average of 13 pieces during the control period. Treatment period 1 (Sign 1), reduced this to 7 pieces, and treatment period 2 (Sign 2) to 4 pieces. Overall, there was a 59 % reduction in litter at campsites when the signs were implemented compared to the control period. While Sign 2, with larger font size and image, appeared more effective in reducing littering, the difference between the signs was not statistically significant, likely due to limited sample size. Most visitors already exhibited responsible behavior by taking their waste home and expressing a strong belief in the importance of not littering, suggesting that explanations and justifications included in Sign 1 were unnecessary. The signs likely served as reminders, increasing attentiveness and encouraging visitors to take all their waste with them, with some picking up litter left by others. These findings highlight the importance of targeted communication in fostering stewardship and providing actionable insights for park managers to reduce environmental impacts and promote sustainable visitor behavior.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.