{"title":"Doxycycline versus levofloxacin combined with tinidazole for treating chronic endometritis: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yue Liu,Zijun Zhao,Xiaorui Jiang,Xiao You,Dacheng Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe spontaneous cure rate of chronic endometritis (CE) is very low, and doxycycline alone or a combination of levofloxacin and tinidazole are the two most widely used antibiotic regimens for treating CE. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal antibiotic regimen.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of doxycycline alone and levofloxacin combined with tinidazole as antibiotic therapies for CE.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nIn this parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two antibiotic therapies for CE, 172 patients with CE diagnosed using CD138 were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. Levofloxacin combined with tinidazole was administered to the treatment group, whereas doxycycline alone was administered to the control group. Repeated hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsies were performed during the first menstrual proliferative period after antibiotic therapy to evaluate the resolution of CE. The one-course cure rate for CE, based on the conversion of CD138 expression from positive to negative, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 160 patients were enrolled, with 79 in the treatment group and 81 in the control group. After one course of antibiotic therapy, there was no difference in the CE cure rate between the groups (84.8% vs. 77.8%) (P = 0.255). In the subgroup analysis based on CE severity, there were no differences between the groups, regardless of whether CE was mild (88.9% vs. 83.7%) (P = 0.464) or severe (79.4% vs. 68.8%) (P = 0.322). In the intent-to-treat analysis (n=172), the cure rates were 77.9% (67/86) and 73.3% (63/86) in the treatment and control groups, respectively, showing no difference between the groups (P = 0.595). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the treatment group (11.6% vs. 2.3%) (P < 0.05) in the safety analysis.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe two antibiotic therapy regimens were effective and safe for treating CE. The study did not find a statistically significant difference in cure rate between the two antibiotic therapy groups. Doxycycline alone is recommended as the first-line treatment because of the lower incidence of adverse reactions.","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The spontaneous cure rate of chronic endometritis (CE) is very low, and doxycycline alone or a combination of levofloxacin and tinidazole are the two most widely used antibiotic regimens for treating CE. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal antibiotic regimen.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of doxycycline alone and levofloxacin combined with tinidazole as antibiotic therapies for CE.
STUDY DESIGN
In this parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two antibiotic therapies for CE, 172 patients with CE diagnosed using CD138 were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. Levofloxacin combined with tinidazole was administered to the treatment group, whereas doxycycline alone was administered to the control group. Repeated hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsies were performed during the first menstrual proliferative period after antibiotic therapy to evaluate the resolution of CE. The one-course cure rate for CE, based on the conversion of CD138 expression from positive to negative, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the groups.
RESULTS
A total of 160 patients were enrolled, with 79 in the treatment group and 81 in the control group. After one course of antibiotic therapy, there was no difference in the CE cure rate between the groups (84.8% vs. 77.8%) (P = 0.255). In the subgroup analysis based on CE severity, there were no differences between the groups, regardless of whether CE was mild (88.9% vs. 83.7%) (P = 0.464) or severe (79.4% vs. 68.8%) (P = 0.322). In the intent-to-treat analysis (n=172), the cure rates were 77.9% (67/86) and 73.3% (63/86) in the treatment and control groups, respectively, showing no difference between the groups (P = 0.595). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher in the treatment group (11.6% vs. 2.3%) (P < 0.05) in the safety analysis.
CONCLUSION
The two antibiotic therapy regimens were effective and safe for treating CE. The study did not find a statistically significant difference in cure rate between the two antibiotic therapy groups. Doxycycline alone is recommended as the first-line treatment because of the lower incidence of adverse reactions.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.