{"title":"The fall and rise of Iruda: Reassembling AI through ethics-in-action.","authors":"Yubeen Kwon,Sungook Hong","doi":"10.1177/03063127251360397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the case of Iruda, an AI chatbot launched in December 2020 by the South Korean startup Scatter Lab. Iruda quickly became the center of a controversy, because of inappropriate remarks and sexual exchanges. As conversations between Iruda and users spread through online communities, the controversy expanded to other issues, including hate speech against minorities and privacy violations. Under public pressure, Scatter Lab quickly suspended Iruda on 12 January 2021. After implementing extensive changes, the company relaunched the chatbot as Iruda 2.0 in October 2022. Notably, this revised version has operated without any major incidents as of mid-2025. This study offers a symmetrical analysis of Iruda's initial failure and subsequent success in terms of 'folds' connecting users, machines, algorithms, and other key elements. We introduce 'configuration' as a mode of folding and show how socio-material assemblages-whether harmful or safe-emerge as a result of different configurations. The success of Iruda 2.0 highlights the importance of placing ethics at the core of AI development and implementation strategies. In addition, we introduce the concept of 'ethics-in-action' to highlight the critical role of practical interventions and user engagement. By tracing Iruda's evolution in detail, this study provides practical guidelines for the successful integration of AI systems into society.","PeriodicalId":51152,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies of Science","volume":"724 1","pages":"3063127251360397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies of Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251360397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines the case of Iruda, an AI chatbot launched in December 2020 by the South Korean startup Scatter Lab. Iruda quickly became the center of a controversy, because of inappropriate remarks and sexual exchanges. As conversations between Iruda and users spread through online communities, the controversy expanded to other issues, including hate speech against minorities and privacy violations. Under public pressure, Scatter Lab quickly suspended Iruda on 12 January 2021. After implementing extensive changes, the company relaunched the chatbot as Iruda 2.0 in October 2022. Notably, this revised version has operated without any major incidents as of mid-2025. This study offers a symmetrical analysis of Iruda's initial failure and subsequent success in terms of 'folds' connecting users, machines, algorithms, and other key elements. We introduce 'configuration' as a mode of folding and show how socio-material assemblages-whether harmful or safe-emerge as a result of different configurations. The success of Iruda 2.0 highlights the importance of placing ethics at the core of AI development and implementation strategies. In addition, we introduce the concept of 'ethics-in-action' to highlight the critical role of practical interventions and user engagement. By tracing Iruda's evolution in detail, this study provides practical guidelines for the successful integration of AI systems into society.
期刊介绍:
Social Studies of Science is an international peer reviewed journal that encourages submissions of original research on science, technology and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary, publishing work from a range of fields including: political science, sociology, economics, history, philosophy, psychology social anthropology, legal and educational disciplines. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)