Are Open-Ended Question Assessments an Emerging Trend in US Medical Education?

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Doreen M Olvet, Tracy B Fulton, Marieke Kruidering, Judith M Brenner, Jeffrey B Bird, Joanne M Willey
{"title":"Are Open-Ended Question Assessments an Emerging Trend in US Medical Education?","authors":"Doreen M Olvet, Tracy B Fulton, Marieke Kruidering, Judith M Brenner, Jeffrey B Bird, Joanne M Willey","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2025.2538051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing amount of literature on the benefits of using open-ended questions (OEQs) to assess knowledge in medical education. However, it is unknown how many US medical schools include OEQs in their assessment toolkits and how they are being used. The purpose of this study was to determine if OEQ assessments are an emerging trend in US medical education. We distributed an online survey to assessment leadership at all 156 US accredited allopathic medical schools between September 2022 and April 2024. Questions focused on the use or future interest of OEQs to assess medical knowledge in the pre-clerkship and clerkship curriculum. We calculated descriptive statistics for prevalence and use rates, and completed a conventional content analysis for open-ended comments. Seventy-eight US medical schools completed the survey (50% response rate). Forty schools (51%) reported using OEQs for medical knowledge assessment. OEQs were used during the pre-clerkship (28 schools), clerkship (two schools) or both parts of the curriculum (10 schools). On average, OEQs accounted for 20% of the pre-clerkship and 11% of the clerkship assessments at each school. Schools used OEQs to assess students' understanding, assess certain types of knowledge, and develop students' deeper learning. Representatives at schools not currently using OEQs reported considering using them in the future but expressed concerns about the amount of time needed to implement them. Numerous schools are using OEQs to assess medical knowledge, suggesting that this assessment format is feasible. Institutions can be innovative in their assessments by extending beyond multiple-choice questions and incorporating other question formats, such as OEQs, to fit their educational needs. This study provides a foundation for future research to explore the utility of OEQs and how to overcome the challenges of implementing OEQ assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2025.2538051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing amount of literature on the benefits of using open-ended questions (OEQs) to assess knowledge in medical education. However, it is unknown how many US medical schools include OEQs in their assessment toolkits and how they are being used. The purpose of this study was to determine if OEQ assessments are an emerging trend in US medical education. We distributed an online survey to assessment leadership at all 156 US accredited allopathic medical schools between September 2022 and April 2024. Questions focused on the use or future interest of OEQs to assess medical knowledge in the pre-clerkship and clerkship curriculum. We calculated descriptive statistics for prevalence and use rates, and completed a conventional content analysis for open-ended comments. Seventy-eight US medical schools completed the survey (50% response rate). Forty schools (51%) reported using OEQs for medical knowledge assessment. OEQs were used during the pre-clerkship (28 schools), clerkship (two schools) or both parts of the curriculum (10 schools). On average, OEQs accounted for 20% of the pre-clerkship and 11% of the clerkship assessments at each school. Schools used OEQs to assess students' understanding, assess certain types of knowledge, and develop students' deeper learning. Representatives at schools not currently using OEQs reported considering using them in the future but expressed concerns about the amount of time needed to implement them. Numerous schools are using OEQs to assess medical knowledge, suggesting that this assessment format is feasible. Institutions can be innovative in their assessments by extending beyond multiple-choice questions and incorporating other question formats, such as OEQs, to fit their educational needs. This study provides a foundation for future research to explore the utility of OEQs and how to overcome the challenges of implementing OEQ assessments.

开放式问题评估是美国医学教育的新趋势吗?
越来越多的文献论述了在医学教育中使用开放式问题(OEQs)来评估知识的好处。然而,目前尚不清楚有多少美国医学院将oeq纳入其评估工具包,以及它们是如何被使用的。本研究的目的是确定OEQ评估是否在美国医学教育中成为一种新兴趋势。我们在2022年9月至2024年4月期间发布了一项在线调查,以评估所有156所美国认可的对抗疗法医学院的领导力。在见习前和见习课程中,问题集中在OEQs的使用或未来兴趣,以评估医学知识。我们计算了流行率和使用率的描述性统计数据,并完成了开放式评论的常规内容分析。78所美国医学院完成了调查(50%的回复率)。40所学校(51%)报告使用OEQs进行医学知识评估。在实习前(28所学校)、实习期间(2所学校)或课程的两个部分(10所学校)都使用了OEQs。平均而言,OEQs占每所学校见习前培训的20%,占见习评估的11%。学校使用oeq来评估学生的理解,评估某些类型的知识,并发展学生的深度学习。目前尚未使用OEQs的学校代表表示,他们考虑在未来使用OEQs,但对实施OEQs所需的时间表示担忧。许多学校正在使用OEQs来评估医学知识,这表明这种评估形式是可行的。机构可以在评估方面进行创新,超越多项选择题,并纳入其他问题形式,如oeq,以满足其教育需求。本研究为未来探索OEQ的效用以及如何克服实施OEQ评估的挑战提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信