Practical approaches to cardiac clearance in nontraditional clinical scenarios.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ethan F Kramer, Jacob C Ricci, Krunal Shukla, Noah J Blaker, Sajan Shroff, Stephen J Brand, Tawfiq Khasawneh, Shruti Sreekanth, David E Winchester
{"title":"Practical approaches to cardiac clearance in nontraditional clinical scenarios.","authors":"Ethan F Kramer, Jacob C Ricci, Krunal Shukla, Noah J Blaker, Sajan Shroff, Stephen J Brand, Tawfiq Khasawneh, Shruti Sreekanth, David E Winchester","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Cardiac clearance\" is frequently sought from clinicians before noncardiac procedures or activities that lack expert consensus guidelines regarding cardiovascular risk evaluation. In 2023, our research group published a review article in TheAmerican Journal of Medicine which summarized the evidence and recommendations for six \"nontraditional\" requests for cardiovascular risk evaluation. Since then, our group continued to receive similar requests. Here, we review the known literature and provide management recommendations for six more requests inspired by real referrals received by the authors. These requests highlight increasingly common therapies including hyperbaric oxygen therapy for wound healing, ketamine for treatment-resistant depression, antipsychotic therapy, and proton therapy to the chest. We also comment on the cardiovascular risk evaluation of being in a strenuous profession as a law enforcement officer and taking part in the less strenuous activity of bowling. Ultimately, we recommend taking a standardized, patient-centered approach to every cardiovascular risk evaluation, first learning about the procedure or activity, then understanding the pertinent physiology, and finally exploring the available literature regarding management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Cardiac clearance" is frequently sought from clinicians before noncardiac procedures or activities that lack expert consensus guidelines regarding cardiovascular risk evaluation. In 2023, our research group published a review article in TheAmerican Journal of Medicine which summarized the evidence and recommendations for six "nontraditional" requests for cardiovascular risk evaluation. Since then, our group continued to receive similar requests. Here, we review the known literature and provide management recommendations for six more requests inspired by real referrals received by the authors. These requests highlight increasingly common therapies including hyperbaric oxygen therapy for wound healing, ketamine for treatment-resistant depression, antipsychotic therapy, and proton therapy to the chest. We also comment on the cardiovascular risk evaluation of being in a strenuous profession as a law enforcement officer and taking part in the less strenuous activity of bowling. Ultimately, we recommend taking a standardized, patient-centered approach to every cardiovascular risk evaluation, first learning about the procedure or activity, then understanding the pertinent physiology, and finally exploring the available literature regarding management.

在非传统临床情况下心脏清除的实用方法。
在心血管风险评估方面缺乏专家共识指南的非心脏手术或活动之前,临床医生经常寻求“心脏清除”。2023年,我们的研究小组在《美国医学杂志》上发表了一篇综述文章,总结了六种“非传统”心血管风险评估要求的证据和建议。从那时起,我们小组继续收到类似的请求。在这里,我们回顾了已知的文献,并为作者收到的真实转诊启发的六个请求提供了管理建议。这些要求强调了越来越常见的治疗方法,包括用于伤口愈合的高压氧治疗,用于治疗难治性抑郁症的氯胺酮治疗,抗精神病药物治疗和胸部质子治疗。我们还评论了作为一名执法人员从事艰苦职业和参加保龄球等不那么艰苦的活动的心血管风险评估。最后,我们建议采用一种标准化的、以患者为中心的方法来进行每一次心血管风险评估,首先了解手术或活动,然后了解相关的生理学,最后探索有关管理的现有文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信