Development and validation of a gut motility based model for predicting bowel preparation quality.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hongjiao Wu, Rui Wu, Yunyun Zhang, Xinyi Lu, Wei Zhao, Biyun Xu, Jun Liu, Nina Zhang
{"title":"Development and validation of a gut motility based model for predicting bowel preparation quality.","authors":"Hongjiao Wu, Rui Wu, Yunyun Zhang, Xinyi Lu, Wei Zhao, Biyun Xu, Jun Liu, Nina Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13739-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate bowel preparation negatively impacts the quality of colonoscopy, potentially resulting in missed lesions and the need for repeat procedures. Although gut motility plays a key role in bowel cleansing, it is often neglected in risk prediction. This study developed and validated a predictive model and simplified scoring system that integrates gut motility parameters to identify individuals at risk of inadequate bowel preparation. A total of 1,165 patients from two hospitals were enrolled, with 815 forming the training set and 350 forming the external validation cohort. The overall rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 9.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that altered bowel movement frequency, stool consistency based on the Bristol Stool Scale, low polyethylene glycol (PEG) volume, and delayed last bowel movement were significant predictors of poor preparation. These variables were incorporated into a user-friendly scoring system that demonstrated good discriminative ability, with area under the curve values of 0.778 and 0.774 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. A cutoff score of 3.0 yielded a sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 66.9%, and a negative predictive value of 96.3% in external validation. This model provides a practical, motility-informed approach for risk stratification and personalized preparation regimens, offering potential to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of colonoscopy in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"28265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13739-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inadequate bowel preparation negatively impacts the quality of colonoscopy, potentially resulting in missed lesions and the need for repeat procedures. Although gut motility plays a key role in bowel cleansing, it is often neglected in risk prediction. This study developed and validated a predictive model and simplified scoring system that integrates gut motility parameters to identify individuals at risk of inadequate bowel preparation. A total of 1,165 patients from two hospitals were enrolled, with 815 forming the training set and 350 forming the external validation cohort. The overall rate of inadequate bowel preparation was 9.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that altered bowel movement frequency, stool consistency based on the Bristol Stool Scale, low polyethylene glycol (PEG) volume, and delayed last bowel movement were significant predictors of poor preparation. These variables were incorporated into a user-friendly scoring system that demonstrated good discriminative ability, with area under the curve values of 0.778 and 0.774 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. A cutoff score of 3.0 yielded a sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 66.9%, and a negative predictive value of 96.3% in external validation. This model provides a practical, motility-informed approach for risk stratification and personalized preparation regimens, offering potential to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of colonoscopy in diverse clinical settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于肠道运动预测肠道准备质量模型的开发和验证。
不充分的肠道准备会对结肠镜检查的质量产生负面影响,可能导致遗漏病变并需要重复检查。虽然肠道运动在肠道清洁中起着关键作用,但在风险预测中往往被忽视。本研究开发并验证了一种预测模型和简化的评分系统,该系统整合了肠道运动参数,以识别肠道准备不足风险的个体。共有来自两家医院的1165名患者入组,其中815人组成训练集,350人组成外部验证队列。肠道准备不充分的总体发生率为9.8%。多变量分析显示,排便频率的改变、基于布里斯托大便量表的大便一致性、低聚乙二醇(PEG)量和最后一次排便延迟是准备不良的重要预测因素。这些变量被纳入一个用户友好的评分系统,该评分系统具有良好的判别能力,训练和验证队列的曲线下面积分别为0.778和0.774。外部验证的临界值为3.0,敏感性为75.0%,特异性为66.9%,阴性预测值为96.3%。该模型为风险分层和个性化准备方案提供了一种实用的、动态的方法,为提高结肠镜检查在不同临床环境中的有效性和效率提供了潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信