Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with embryos generated from COVID‑19 infection during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Huayan Yin, Jingtang Zhang, Yuqi Zhou, Jieru Li, Longmei Wu, Qunshan Shen, Yunxia Cao, Bing Song
{"title":"Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with embryos generated from COVID‑19 infection during controlled ovarian stimulation: a retrospective study.","authors":"Huayan Yin, Jingtang Zhang, Yuqi Zhou, Jieru Li, Longmei Wu, Qunshan Shen, Yunxia Cao, Bing Song","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03608-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This investigation aimed to explore the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. This area has not been thoroughly examined in previous research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 126 couples with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during COS and evaluated FET outcomes using embryos generated during virologically active exposure windows. Controls were noninfected women during COS, matched by age, number, and day of embryo transfer in the same time. Demographic and cycle characteristics and pregnancy and obstetric outcomes were examined for this retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This cohort study comprised 300 infertile couples, stratified into SARS-CoV-2-exposed (n = 126) and unexposed (n = 174) groups based on infection status during COS. The clinical pregnancy rates were 58.8% and 58.6%, respectively (P = 0.958). Other pregnancy features, including biochemical pregnancy, early miscarriage, ongoing pregnancy, and cumulative clinical pregnancy, were also comparable between the two groups. No significant intergroup differences were observed in obstetric outcomes, such as gestational age, cesarean section rates, and preterm birth rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In FET cycles of patients with embryos generated from SARS-CoV-2 infection, no significant difference in pregnancy and obstetric outcomes was observed. These data substantiate the reproductive safety of FET following SARS-CoV-2 exposure during COS. Nevertheless, more studies are needed for longitudinal investigations to elucidate the transgenerational effects of SARS-CoV-2 on somatic maturation and neurodevelopmental trajectories in offspring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03608-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This investigation aimed to explore the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. This area has not been thoroughly examined in previous research.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 126 couples with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during COS and evaluated FET outcomes using embryos generated during virologically active exposure windows. Controls were noninfected women during COS, matched by age, number, and day of embryo transfer in the same time. Demographic and cycle characteristics and pregnancy and obstetric outcomes were examined for this retrospective cohort analysis.

Results: This cohort study comprised 300 infertile couples, stratified into SARS-CoV-2-exposed (n = 126) and unexposed (n = 174) groups based on infection status during COS. The clinical pregnancy rates were 58.8% and 58.6%, respectively (P = 0.958). Other pregnancy features, including biochemical pregnancy, early miscarriage, ongoing pregnancy, and cumulative clinical pregnancy, were also comparable between the two groups. No significant intergroup differences were observed in obstetric outcomes, such as gestational age, cesarean section rates, and preterm birth rates.

Conclusions: In FET cycles of patients with embryos generated from SARS-CoV-2 infection, no significant difference in pregnancy and obstetric outcomes was observed. These data substantiate the reproductive safety of FET following SARS-CoV-2 exposure during COS. Nevertheless, more studies are needed for longitudinal investigations to elucidate the transgenerational effects of SARS-CoV-2 on somatic maturation and neurodevelopmental trajectories in offspring.

受控卵巢刺激期间COVID - 19感染胚胎的冻融胚胎移植的妊娠和产科结局:一项回顾性研究
目的:探讨控制性卵巢刺激(COS)期间感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)对冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期妊娠和分娩结局的影响。这一领域在以前的研究中没有得到彻底的研究。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了126对在COS期间确诊感染SARS-CoV-2的夫妇,并使用病毒学活跃暴露窗期间产生的胚胎评估FET结果。对照组为COS期间未感染的妇女,与同期胚胎移植的年龄、数量和天数相匹配。回顾性队列分析检查了人口统计学和周期特征以及妊娠和产科结局。结果:该队列研究包括300对不育夫妇,根据COS期间的感染状况分为sars - cov -2暴露组(n = 126)和未暴露组(n = 174)。临床妊娠率分别为58.8%和58.6% (P = 0.958)。其他妊娠特征,包括生化妊娠、早期流产、持续妊娠和累积临床妊娠,在两组之间也具有可比性。在产科结局(如胎龄、剖宫产率和早产率)方面没有观察到显著的组间差异。结论:在SARS-CoV-2感染胚胎患者的FET周期中,妊娠和产科结局无显著差异。这些数据证实了COS期间暴露于SARS-CoV-2后FET的生殖安全性。然而,需要更多的纵向研究来阐明SARS-CoV-2对后代体细胞成熟和神经发育轨迹的跨代影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信