Validation of a Relative Centrifugal Force method for the enumeration and detection of Campylobacter from chicken carcass rinsates

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Joanne M. Kingsbury , Anne Midwinter , John Mills , Mark Englefield , Roy Biggs , Anne-Marie Perchec Merien , Nicola Dermer , Aswathi Soni , Milana Blakemore
{"title":"Validation of a Relative Centrifugal Force method for the enumeration and detection of Campylobacter from chicken carcass rinsates","authors":"Joanne M. Kingsbury ,&nbsp;Anne Midwinter ,&nbsp;John Mills ,&nbsp;Mark Englefield ,&nbsp;Roy Biggs ,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Perchec Merien ,&nbsp;Nicola Dermer ,&nbsp;Aswathi Soni ,&nbsp;Milana Blakemore","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently notified foodborne disease in New Zealand and poultry is the predominant infection source. New Zealand monitors <em>Campylobacter</em> present in poultry carcass rinsates under the National Microbiological Database (NMD) programme. To better monitor <em>Campylobacter</em> control improvements, a more sensitive method is required that can enumerate rinsates with lower <em>Campylobacter</em> numbers. This study developed a modification of the current NMD method involving adding a relative centrifugal force (RCF) step for concentrating <em>Campylobacter</em> from poultry carcass rinsates. Centrifugation for 30 min significantly improved <em>Campylobacter</em> recovery compared with 15 min (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), but there were no differences between RCFs of 3500, 4000 and 4430 x g (<em>p</em> = 0.992). RCF and NMD method performances were compared in a single laboratory validation study that used different inoculation levels of twelve <em>Campylobacter</em> strains, including poultry isolates. <em>Campylobacter</em> was detected from more samples (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) using the RCF method (93 of 126; 73.8 %) than the NMD method (65 of 126; 51.6 %). The RCF method had a seven-fold lower detection limit (28 colony forming units (CFU)/400 ml) than the NMD method (200 CFU/400 ml). The detection limit accounted for an observed 70.3 % of the inoculated CFU captured within the centrifuged pellet. <em>Campylobacter</em> was also detected from significantly more (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) commercial chicken rinsate samples tested by poultry industry laboratories using the RCF method (257 of 863; 29.8 %) than the NMD method (114 of 863; 13.2 %). Taken together, results support the RCF method as a modification of the NMD method to enumerate lower numbers of <em>Campylobacter</em> in rinsates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770122500123X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently notified foodborne disease in New Zealand and poultry is the predominant infection source. New Zealand monitors Campylobacter present in poultry carcass rinsates under the National Microbiological Database (NMD) programme. To better monitor Campylobacter control improvements, a more sensitive method is required that can enumerate rinsates with lower Campylobacter numbers. This study developed a modification of the current NMD method involving adding a relative centrifugal force (RCF) step for concentrating Campylobacter from poultry carcass rinsates. Centrifugation for 30 min significantly improved Campylobacter recovery compared with 15 min (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between RCFs of 3500, 4000 and 4430 x g (p = 0.992). RCF and NMD method performances were compared in a single laboratory validation study that used different inoculation levels of twelve Campylobacter strains, including poultry isolates. Campylobacter was detected from more samples (p < 0.001) using the RCF method (93 of 126; 73.8 %) than the NMD method (65 of 126; 51.6 %). The RCF method had a seven-fold lower detection limit (28 colony forming units (CFU)/400 ml) than the NMD method (200 CFU/400 ml). The detection limit accounted for an observed 70.3 % of the inoculated CFU captured within the centrifuged pellet. Campylobacter was also detected from significantly more (p < 0.001) commercial chicken rinsate samples tested by poultry industry laboratories using the RCF method (257 of 863; 29.8 %) than the NMD method (114 of 863; 13.2 %). Taken together, results support the RCF method as a modification of the NMD method to enumerate lower numbers of Campylobacter in rinsates.

Abstract Image

鸡胴体冲洗液中弯曲杆菌的相对离心力法计数和检测方法的验证。
弯曲杆菌病是新西兰最常见的食源性疾病,家禽是主要的感染源。新西兰根据国家微生物数据库(NMD)计划监测家禽胴体冲洗液中存在的弯曲杆菌。为了更好地监测弯曲杆菌的控制进展,需要一种更灵敏的方法来枚举弯曲杆菌数量较少的菌株。本研究对现有的NMD方法进行了改进,增加了一个相对离心力(RCF)步骤,用于从家禽胴体冲洗液中浓缩弯曲杆菌。与15 min相比,离心30 min可显著提高弯曲杆菌的回收率(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信