{"title":"\"How did it go?\"-investigation of physician's experience during embryo transfer and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.","authors":"Sara C Pierpoint, Mary Peavey, Linnea Goodman","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03609-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research sought to investigate if a physician's experience of an embryo transfer (ET) correlates to rates of success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single experienced physician rated characteristics of ETs including ease of transfer (1-10), visibility (1-10), presence of blood, and amount of mucus (0-3) at the time of ET. Main outcomes were positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level 11 days post transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 transfers were rated. The average age of patients was 34.2 + / - 4.6 years. A total of 69.6% of cycles were programmed, and 73.2% of the transferred embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-a) prior to transfer. Average ease of transfer scores (9.3 + / - 1.7 vs 9.2 + / - 1.7; p = 0.71) and visibility scores (8.3 + / - 2.3 vs 8.1 + / - 2.8; p = 0.37) were similar between positive and negative pregnancy tests, respectively. Blood and mucus did not influence pregnancy rates. There was no correlation between ease of mock and actual embryo transfers. Multivariate logistic regression for positive bHCG demonstrated a significant predictive value for PGT-a (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.47-4.23). Ease of transfer (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.15), visibility (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15), mucus (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30), and embryo age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) were not predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In experienced hands, physician subjective impressions of transfer characteristics were not significantly correlated with a successful transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03609-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This research sought to investigate if a physician's experience of an embryo transfer (ET) correlates to rates of success.
Methods: A single experienced physician rated characteristics of ETs including ease of transfer (1-10), visibility (1-10), presence of blood, and amount of mucus (0-3) at the time of ET. Main outcomes were positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level 11 days post transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate.
Results: A total of 365 transfers were rated. The average age of patients was 34.2 + / - 4.6 years. A total of 69.6% of cycles were programmed, and 73.2% of the transferred embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-a) prior to transfer. Average ease of transfer scores (9.3 + / - 1.7 vs 9.2 + / - 1.7; p = 0.71) and visibility scores (8.3 + / - 2.3 vs 8.1 + / - 2.8; p = 0.37) were similar between positive and negative pregnancy tests, respectively. Blood and mucus did not influence pregnancy rates. There was no correlation between ease of mock and actual embryo transfers. Multivariate logistic regression for positive bHCG demonstrated a significant predictive value for PGT-a (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.47-4.23). Ease of transfer (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.15), visibility (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15), mucus (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30), and embryo age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) were not predictive.
Conclusions: In experienced hands, physician subjective impressions of transfer characteristics were not significantly correlated with a successful transfer.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.