Rachael Kelley, Claire A Surr, Gregor Russell, George Crowther, Rebecca Dickinson, Jemima Dooley, Alys W Griffiths, Peter Knapp, Sarah J Smith
{"title":"Influential Factors when Making Decisions About Dementia Medications in Memory Assessment Services; a Focused Ethnography and Interview Study.","authors":"Rachael Kelley, Claire A Surr, Gregor Russell, George Crowther, Rebecca Dickinson, Jemima Dooley, Alys W Griffiths, Peter Knapp, Sarah J Smith","doi":"10.1177/08919887251362465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDiscussing pharmaceutical treatment for dementia is challenging because of variation in disease progression, lack of curative treatments, and communication difficulties. Research in the context of dementia suggests shared decision making is limited, this study examined how dementia medications are discussed in practice.MethodsFocused video/audio ethnography of clinical appointments (n = 14), semi-structured interviews with patients/supporters (n = 23) and clinicians (n = 5) were employed to examine communication practices.ResultsTwo themes developed; <i>Framing and understanding of information in the context of uncertainty</i> explores how uncertainties around risks and benefits are understood. <i>'Not worth the risk'</i> or '<i>nothing to lose</i>' presents how patients/supporters and clinicians balance individuals' contexts/perceived risks/benefits. In the absence of certainty around potential benefits, risk often informed decision-making, particularly for frailer or more vulnerable patients.ConclusionsClinicians should be aware of their influence on decision-making and be cognisant of the way that they frame opinions, which are largely based on clinical experience. Prescribers would benefit from a standardised information source which enables them to describe the likelihood and magnitude of benefits and side effects in a universal way. Accessible information for patients and relatives about the same is also recommended. Patients and relatives make their decisions to take medications in the context of relative uncertainty about the likelihood of benefits, with risk playing a pivotal role in decision making for some.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251362465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251362465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundDiscussing pharmaceutical treatment for dementia is challenging because of variation in disease progression, lack of curative treatments, and communication difficulties. Research in the context of dementia suggests shared decision making is limited, this study examined how dementia medications are discussed in practice.MethodsFocused video/audio ethnography of clinical appointments (n = 14), semi-structured interviews with patients/supporters (n = 23) and clinicians (n = 5) were employed to examine communication practices.ResultsTwo themes developed; Framing and understanding of information in the context of uncertainty explores how uncertainties around risks and benefits are understood. 'Not worth the risk' or 'nothing to lose' presents how patients/supporters and clinicians balance individuals' contexts/perceived risks/benefits. In the absence of certainty around potential benefits, risk often informed decision-making, particularly for frailer or more vulnerable patients.ConclusionsClinicians should be aware of their influence on decision-making and be cognisant of the way that they frame opinions, which are largely based on clinical experience. Prescribers would benefit from a standardised information source which enables them to describe the likelihood and magnitude of benefits and side effects in a universal way. Accessible information for patients and relatives about the same is also recommended. Patients and relatives make their decisions to take medications in the context of relative uncertainty about the likelihood of benefits, with risk playing a pivotal role in decision making for some.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.