Rapid, season-specific PCR testing versus traditional diagnostics for pneumonia in the emergency department.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yangxiu Yu, Qiuping Li
{"title":"Rapid, season-specific PCR testing versus traditional diagnostics for pneumonia in the emergency department.","authors":"Yangxiu Yu, Qiuping Li","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03843-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional culture-based diagnostics for emergency-department (ED) pneumonia are slow and season-agnostic, delaying targeted therapy. We evaluated whether season-tailored multiplex PCR panels accelerate pathogen identification and improve antibiotic stewardship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center, prospective study, adults with radiographically confirmed pneumonia were enrolled consecutively and allocated by a rotating week-on/week-off schedule to either a seasonal PCR panel or conventional diagnostics. Primary outcomes were (i) time to final pathogen report and (ii) diagnostic yield (≥ 1 pathogen detected). Secondary outcomes included empiric-antibiotic appropriateness within 24 h, regimen changes ≤ 72 h, antibiotic duration, length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 282 analyzable patients (spring = 140; autumn-winter = 142), PCR slashed turnaround time from 48 h to 12 h in spring and from 50 h to 14 h in autumn-winter (median difference - 36 h, 95% CI: - 42 to - 30; p < 0.001). Diagnostic yield rose from 61.6 to 80.6% in spring and from 56.8 to 80.0% in winter (risk differences 19.0 pp and 22.3 pp, respectively; both p < 0.01). In the winter cohort, guideline-concordant empiric therapy increased (78.7% vs. 64.9%; +13.8 pp) and antibiotic changes ≤ 72 h fell (14.7% vs. 28.4%; - 13.7 pp). Mean antibiotic courses shortened by 1.5-1.7 days across seasons, while LOS showed a non-significant 1-2-day reduction. Thirty-day mortality did not differ. Effects were consistent in older adults (≥ 65 y) and patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Locally adapted, season-specific multiplex PCR panels deliver near-four-fold faster, higher-yield pathogen detection and support measurable stewardship gains without compromising safety. Implementation in other settings should consider local pathogen seasonality, workflow, and cost structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03843-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional culture-based diagnostics for emergency-department (ED) pneumonia are slow and season-agnostic, delaying targeted therapy. We evaluated whether season-tailored multiplex PCR panels accelerate pathogen identification and improve antibiotic stewardship.

Methods: In a single-center, prospective study, adults with radiographically confirmed pneumonia were enrolled consecutively and allocated by a rotating week-on/week-off schedule to either a seasonal PCR panel or conventional diagnostics. Primary outcomes were (i) time to final pathogen report and (ii) diagnostic yield (≥ 1 pathogen detected). Secondary outcomes included empiric-antibiotic appropriateness within 24 h, regimen changes ≤ 72 h, antibiotic duration, length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality.

Results: Among 282 analyzable patients (spring = 140; autumn-winter = 142), PCR slashed turnaround time from 48 h to 12 h in spring and from 50 h to 14 h in autumn-winter (median difference - 36 h, 95% CI: - 42 to - 30; p < 0.001). Diagnostic yield rose from 61.6 to 80.6% in spring and from 56.8 to 80.0% in winter (risk differences 19.0 pp and 22.3 pp, respectively; both p < 0.01). In the winter cohort, guideline-concordant empiric therapy increased (78.7% vs. 64.9%; +13.8 pp) and antibiotic changes ≤ 72 h fell (14.7% vs. 28.4%; - 13.7 pp). Mean antibiotic courses shortened by 1.5-1.7 days across seasons, while LOS showed a non-significant 1-2-day reduction. Thirty-day mortality did not differ. Effects were consistent in older adults (≥ 65 y) and patients with COPD.

Conclusions: Locally adapted, season-specific multiplex PCR panels deliver near-four-fold faster, higher-yield pathogen detection and support measurable stewardship gains without compromising safety. Implementation in other settings should consider local pathogen seasonality, workflow, and cost structures.

Abstract Image

快速、季节性特异性PCR检测与急诊科肺炎传统诊断的比较
背景:传统的基于培养的诊断法对急诊科(ED)肺炎的诊断是缓慢的和季节不确定的,延迟了靶向治疗。我们评估了按季节定制的多重PCR面板是否能加速病原体鉴定和改善抗生素管理。方法:在一项单中心前瞻性研究中,影像学证实的肺炎成人患者连续入组,并按周/周轮换计划分配到季节性PCR小组或常规诊断组。主要结果是(i)最终病原体报告的时间和(ii)诊断率(检测到≥1种病原体)。次要结局包括24 h内的经验抗生素适宜性、≤72 h的方案变化、抗生素使用时间、住院时间(LOS)和30天死亡率。结果:282例可分析患者中(春季= 140例;秋冬季= 142),PCR将周转时间从春季的48小时缩短至12小时,从秋冬季的50小时缩短至14小时(中位数差异- 36小时,95% CI: - 42至- 30;p结论:适合当地的、特定季节的多重PCR检测板可将病原体检测速度提高近四倍,产量更高,并在不影响安全性的情况下支持可衡量的管理收益。在其他环境中实施应考虑当地病原体的季节性、工作流程和成本结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信