Resources, implementation, and performance of hand hygiene practices and their impact on hospital care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Greece.
{"title":"Resources, implementation, and performance of hand hygiene practices and their impact on hospital care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Greece.","authors":"Eirini Astrinaki, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Efsevia Vitsaxaki, Stamatina Saplamidou, Panagiotis Skevakis, Emmanouil Bolikas, Despoina Christofaki, Apostolia Salvaraki, Christos Kleovoulou, Styliani Papathanasaki, Chrisanthi Markopoulou, Evagelia Magouli, Diamantis Kofteridis, Petros Ioannou","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The World Health Organization's \"Ward Infrastructure Survey,\" \"Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework\" (HHSAF), and the \"5 Moments\" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the \"Basic\" (n = 5, 62%) or \"Inadequate\" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).
Methods: The World Health Organization's "Ward Infrastructure Survey," "Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework" (HHSAF), and the "5 Moments" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.
Results: Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the "Basic" (n = 5, 62%) or "Inadequate" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).
Conclusions: Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.
期刊介绍:
AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)