Resources, implementation, and performance of hand hygiene practices and their impact on hospital care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Greece.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eirini Astrinaki, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Efsevia Vitsaxaki, Stamatina Saplamidou, Panagiotis Skevakis, Emmanouil Bolikas, Despoina Christofaki, Apostolia Salvaraki, Christos Kleovoulou, Styliani Papathanasaki, Chrisanthi Markopoulou, Evagelia Magouli, Diamantis Kofteridis, Petros Ioannou
{"title":"Resources, implementation, and performance of hand hygiene practices and their impact on hospital care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Greece.","authors":"Eirini Astrinaki, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Efsevia Vitsaxaki, Stamatina Saplamidou, Panagiotis Skevakis, Emmanouil Bolikas, Despoina Christofaki, Apostolia Salvaraki, Christos Kleovoulou, Styliani Papathanasaki, Chrisanthi Markopoulou, Evagelia Magouli, Diamantis Kofteridis, Petros Ioannou","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The World Health Organization's \"Ward Infrastructure Survey,\" \"Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework\" (HHSAF), and the \"5 Moments\" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the \"Basic\" (n = 5, 62%) or \"Inadequate\" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).

Methods: The World Health Organization's "Ward Infrastructure Survey," "Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework" (HHSAF), and the "5 Moments" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.

Results: Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the "Basic" (n = 5, 62%) or "Inadequate" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).

Conclusions: Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.

资源、实施和手部卫生实践的表现及其对医院护理的影响:希腊的多中心横断面调查。
背景:关于希腊医院手部卫生习惯的数据有限。本研究评估了八家公立医院的手卫生资源、实施和依从性及其对医疗保健相关血流感染(bsi)的影响。方法:采用世界卫生组织“病区基础设施调查”、“手卫生自评框架”(HHSAF)和“5 Moments”概念。采用泊松回归评估手卫生指标和BSI率。结果:87%的病房厕所设有洗手设施。Νearly所有水槽(96%)都有肥皂,但一次性纸巾的可用性为51%。在护理点,酒精基洗手液(ABHR)的可用性为41.8%。医院得分为“基本”(n=5;62%)或“不足”(n=3;38%)的手卫生执行水平,平均HHSAF得分为140分。一家受访三级医院的依从性为58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%),而一家二级医院的依从性仅为9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%)。ABHR可用性越高(发生率比(IRR)为1.09 / ABHR增加10% p=0.002)和未使用粉手套时,病房BSI率越高(IRR为2.09,p)。结论:调查医院的手卫生依从性存在显著差异,实施策略不有效。改善手部卫生基础设施、教育和反馈可以促进目前的得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信