Steffen Tillmann, Stefan Basermann, Stefanie Elgeti
{"title":"Comparison of Numerical Methods for Geometric Warpage Compensation","authors":"Steffen Tillmann, Stefan Basermann, Stefanie Elgeti","doi":"10.1002/fld.5404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In injection molding processes, shrinkage and warpage cause deviations in the size and shape of produced parts compared to the cavity shape. While shrinkage is due to the change of material density during solidification, warpage is caused by uneven cooling and internal stresses within the part. One approach to mitigate these effects is by adjusting the cavity shape to anticipate the deformation. While finding the optimal cavity shape is often experience-based in practice, numerical design optimization can greatly assist in this process. In this study, we evaluate various numerical algorithms from existing literature to identify the optimal cavity shape. Each method is briefly outlined regarding how it adapts the geometry, and we discuss their respective strengths and weaknesses for different scenarios. We conduct comparisons using 3D geometries of varying complexity. Our findings demonstrate that, for geometric warpage compensation, the node-based reverse geometry method yields the least warpage and is computationally cost-effective. Furthermore, it is straightforward to implement and consistently performs well across different geometries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"97 9","pages":"1280-1288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.5404","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In injection molding processes, shrinkage and warpage cause deviations in the size and shape of produced parts compared to the cavity shape. While shrinkage is due to the change of material density during solidification, warpage is caused by uneven cooling and internal stresses within the part. One approach to mitigate these effects is by adjusting the cavity shape to anticipate the deformation. While finding the optimal cavity shape is often experience-based in practice, numerical design optimization can greatly assist in this process. In this study, we evaluate various numerical algorithms from existing literature to identify the optimal cavity shape. Each method is briefly outlined regarding how it adapts the geometry, and we discuss their respective strengths and weaknesses for different scenarios. We conduct comparisons using 3D geometries of varying complexity. Our findings demonstrate that, for geometric warpage compensation, the node-based reverse geometry method yields the least warpage and is computationally cost-effective. Furthermore, it is straightforward to implement and consistently performs well across different geometries.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction.
Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review.
The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.