Educational Interventions to Develop and Enhance Clinical Documentation Skills in Health Professional Students: A Systematic Review

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-08-03 DOI:10.1111/tct.70157
Sarah Wilesmith, Allison Mandrusiak, Ray Lang, Romany Martin, Andric Lu, Roma Forbes
{"title":"Educational Interventions to Develop and Enhance Clinical Documentation Skills in Health Professional Students: A Systematic Review","authors":"Sarah Wilesmith,&nbsp;Allison Mandrusiak,&nbsp;Ray Lang,&nbsp;Romany Martin,&nbsp;Andric Lu,&nbsp;Roma Forbes","doi":"10.1111/tct.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical documentation is necessary for effective and safe healthcare practice. This paper systematically reviewed educational interventions aimed at developing entry-level health professional students' clinical documentation skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane) from January 2000 to May 2023 was performed, with additional forward and backward citation searching. Inclusion was limited to original manuscripts published in English from January 2000, reporting an experimental or quasi-experimental design and using objective performance-based measures. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), with narrative synthesis of results due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 5313 records identified, 29 studies were eligible for inclusion. The health professions represented were medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, psychology and veterinary science. Teaching methodologies included the following: didactic instruction; provision of templates, guidelines and/or examples; instructor-led group discussion; individual or group instructor feedback; near-peer or peer feedback; self-evaluation; writing practice activities; worked examples; and response-to-stimulus writing activities (written, video or live standardised patient cases). Research quality was low in MERSQI domains of ‘<i>study design</i>’ and ‘<i>validity of evaluation instruments</i>’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Several training methods appear valuable in developing student skills in clinical documentation; however, high-quality evaluation of documentation training interventions is lacking. Future research is recommended to compare existing methods of documentation training and to evaluate training in underexplored healthcare disciplines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical documentation is necessary for effective and safe healthcare practice. This paper systematically reviewed educational interventions aimed at developing entry-level health professional students' clinical documentation skills.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane) from January 2000 to May 2023 was performed, with additional forward and backward citation searching. Inclusion was limited to original manuscripts published in English from January 2000, reporting an experimental or quasi-experimental design and using objective performance-based measures. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), with narrative synthesis of results due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures.

Results

Of 5313 records identified, 29 studies were eligible for inclusion. The health professions represented were medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, psychology and veterinary science. Teaching methodologies included the following: didactic instruction; provision of templates, guidelines and/or examples; instructor-led group discussion; individual or group instructor feedback; near-peer or peer feedback; self-evaluation; writing practice activities; worked examples; and response-to-stimulus writing activities (written, video or live standardised patient cases). Research quality was low in MERSQI domains of ‘study design’ and ‘validity of evaluation instruments’.

Conclusion

Several training methods appear valuable in developing student skills in clinical documentation; however, high-quality evaluation of documentation training interventions is lacking. Future research is recommended to compare existing methods of documentation training and to evaluate training in underexplored healthcare disciplines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

培养和提高卫生专业学生临床文献技能的教育干预:系统综述
临床文件是有效和安全的医疗保健实践的必要条件。本文系统地回顾了旨在培养初级卫生专业学生临床文献技能的教育干预措施。方法系统检索2000年1月至2023年5月的PubMed、CINAHL、Embase和Cochrane电子数据库,并进行引文的正向和反向检索。纳入限于2000年1月以来以英文发表的原始手稿,报告实验或准实验设计,并使用客观的基于绩效的衡量标准。使用医学教育研究质量工具(MERSQI)进行质量评价,由于结果测量的异质性,采用叙述性综合结果。结果在5313条记录中,有29项研究符合纳入条件。代表的保健专业有医学、牙科、护理、药学、心理学和兽医学。教学方法包括:说教式教学;提供模板、指引及/或例子;教师主导的小组讨论;个人或团体导师反馈;近同伴或同伴反馈;自我评价;写作实践活动;工作的例子;以及响应刺激写作活动(书面、视频或现场标准化患者案例)。MERSQI在“研究设计”和“评估工具效度”方面的研究质量较低。结论几种训练方法对培养学生临床文献技能具有重要意义;然而,缺乏对文件培训干预措施的高质量评价。未来的研究建议比较现有的文献培训方法,并评估未开发的医疗保健学科的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信