Green Bonds: Greenwashing or Genuinely Green? A Study Based on Stock Mispricing

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Pengfei Ge, Chuxiong Tang, Yuhui Chen, Yichao Liu, Rui Zhu
{"title":"Green Bonds: Greenwashing or Genuinely Green? A Study Based on Stock Mispricing","authors":"Pengfei Ge,&nbsp;Chuxiong Tang,&nbsp;Yuhui Chen,&nbsp;Yichao Liu,&nbsp;Rui Zhu","doi":"10.1002/mde.4534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The proposal of carbon neutrality has led to a significant growth in green bonds (GBs), sparking in turn widespread attention on whether these bonds are issued for genuinely green objectives or for greenwashing intentions. The extant research has not fully explored the greenwashing issue concerning GBs, particularly due to the controversies in the methods for identifying such practices. Following the outbreak of COVID-19, the global markets have seen a slowdown in the issuance of GBs, whereas China has experienced a surge in its GB market, emerging as the world's foremost issuer of GBs. In light of this economic reality and to address the research gap, this study draws on Chinese GBs as research objects and examines for the first time the issue of greenwashing in GBs through the lens of stock mispricing (SM). The results reveal that the issuance of GBs by companies significantly exacerbates SM, indicating the presence of greenwashing in Chinese GBs. Notably, the greenwashing issue is more pronounced when firms that issue GBs have political connections with the government and experience low financial risks. These findings not only enrich studies on greenwashing in GBs but also offer valuable insights for investors and regulators.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 6","pages":"3396-3413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proposal of carbon neutrality has led to a significant growth in green bonds (GBs), sparking in turn widespread attention on whether these bonds are issued for genuinely green objectives or for greenwashing intentions. The extant research has not fully explored the greenwashing issue concerning GBs, particularly due to the controversies in the methods for identifying such practices. Following the outbreak of COVID-19, the global markets have seen a slowdown in the issuance of GBs, whereas China has experienced a surge in its GB market, emerging as the world's foremost issuer of GBs. In light of this economic reality and to address the research gap, this study draws on Chinese GBs as research objects and examines for the first time the issue of greenwashing in GBs through the lens of stock mispricing (SM). The results reveal that the issuance of GBs by companies significantly exacerbates SM, indicating the presence of greenwashing in Chinese GBs. Notably, the greenwashing issue is more pronounced when firms that issue GBs have political connections with the government and experience low financial risks. These findings not only enrich studies on greenwashing in GBs but also offer valuable insights for investors and regulators.

绿色债券:洗白还是真正的绿色?基于股票错误定价的研究
碳中和的提议导致了绿色债券(GBs)的显著增长,进而引发了人们对这些债券是出于真正的绿色目标还是出于“漂绿”意图而发行的广泛关注。现有的研究并没有充分探讨关于GBs的“漂绿”问题,特别是由于在识别这种做法的方法上存在争议。新冠肺炎疫情爆发后,全球市场国债发行放缓,而中国国债市场出现激增,成为全球最大的国债发行国。鉴于这一经济现实,为了弥补研究空白,本研究以中国的国有企业为研究对象,首次从股票错误定价(SM)的角度审视国有企业的“漂绿”问题。结果表明,企业发行国债显著加剧了SM,表明中国国债中存在“漂绿”现象。值得注意的是,当发行国债的公司与政府有政治关系,且财务风险较低时,“漂绿”问题更为明显。这些发现不仅丰富了关于政府债券“漂绿”的研究,也为投资者和监管机构提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信