Antonio Castellano Albors, Anita Shepherd, Ian Shield, William Macalpine, Kevin Lindegaard, Ian Tubby, Astley Hastings
{"title":"A Global Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Willow Dataset for the Bioeconomy: Implications for the Yield in the United Kingdom","authors":"Antonio Castellano Albors, Anita Shepherd, Ian Shield, William Macalpine, Kevin Lindegaard, Ian Tubby, Astley Hastings","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Short rotation coppice (SRC) willow is a second-generation lignocellulosic energy crop with a background of research and breeding programmes carried out globally for more than three decades. While commercial standards include planting in mixtures of 6–8 willow genotypes of genetic diversity, much research to date has focused on monoculture trials. Research has found significant differences in willow performance through different management methods, soil properties and environmental interactions (GxE), when applied locally. However, global analysis of these interactions remains a challenge. We present a global SRC willow dataset to facilitate researchers and growers with a resource not available to date to help in closing the gap between research and industry. Data has been collected through literature review and personal communications with key researchers on willow in the United Kingdom. Global annual average yield is 9 Mg Dry Matter (DM) ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> with 17 genotypes, including two types of mixtures, above the economic threshold of 10 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. Canada and the United States are the best and worst performers with 10.6 and 6.7 Mg DM hr<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. We expect this dataset to provide an efficient way of estimating yields at a smaller scale by multiple combinations of GxE interactions. Biomass production from 1-year-old stems in the first harvest cycle is significantly lower than for the second and third year of the first harvest cycle (ANOVA, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Harvest cycles of 2 and 3 years did show significant but small differences in final yield (<i>t</i> = 3.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A random forest statistical procedure was applied to test for the association of the predictor variables with biomass production. The model explained up to 63.65% of the variance observed in yield for all genotypes and sites, with genetic diversity among the most important variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Short rotation coppice (SRC) willow is a second-generation lignocellulosic energy crop with a background of research and breeding programmes carried out globally for more than three decades. While commercial standards include planting in mixtures of 6–8 willow genotypes of genetic diversity, much research to date has focused on monoculture trials. Research has found significant differences in willow performance through different management methods, soil properties and environmental interactions (GxE), when applied locally. However, global analysis of these interactions remains a challenge. We present a global SRC willow dataset to facilitate researchers and growers with a resource not available to date to help in closing the gap between research and industry. Data has been collected through literature review and personal communications with key researchers on willow in the United Kingdom. Global annual average yield is 9 Mg Dry Matter (DM) ha−1 year−1 with 17 genotypes, including two types of mixtures, above the economic threshold of 10 Mg DM ha−1 year−1. Canada and the United States are the best and worst performers with 10.6 and 6.7 Mg DM hr−1 year−1, respectively. We expect this dataset to provide an efficient way of estimating yields at a smaller scale by multiple combinations of GxE interactions. Biomass production from 1-year-old stems in the first harvest cycle is significantly lower than for the second and third year of the first harvest cycle (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Harvest cycles of 2 and 3 years did show significant but small differences in final yield (t = 3.87, p < 0.001). A random forest statistical procedure was applied to test for the association of the predictor variables with biomass production. The model explained up to 63.65% of the variance observed in yield for all genotypes and sites, with genetic diversity among the most important variables.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.