A Global Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Willow Dataset for the Bioeconomy: Implications for the Yield in the United Kingdom

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Antonio Castellano Albors, Anita Shepherd, Ian Shield, William Macalpine, Kevin Lindegaard, Ian Tubby, Astley Hastings
{"title":"A Global Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Willow Dataset for the Bioeconomy: Implications for the Yield in the United Kingdom","authors":"Antonio Castellano Albors,&nbsp;Anita Shepherd,&nbsp;Ian Shield,&nbsp;William Macalpine,&nbsp;Kevin Lindegaard,&nbsp;Ian Tubby,&nbsp;Astley Hastings","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Short rotation coppice (SRC) willow is a second-generation lignocellulosic energy crop with a background of research and breeding programmes carried out globally for more than three decades. While commercial standards include planting in mixtures of 6–8 willow genotypes of genetic diversity, much research to date has focused on monoculture trials. Research has found significant differences in willow performance through different management methods, soil properties and environmental interactions (GxE), when applied locally. However, global analysis of these interactions remains a challenge. We present a global SRC willow dataset to facilitate researchers and growers with a resource not available to date to help in closing the gap between research and industry. Data has been collected through literature review and personal communications with key researchers on willow in the United Kingdom. Global annual average yield is 9 Mg Dry Matter (DM) ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> with 17 genotypes, including two types of mixtures, above the economic threshold of 10 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. Canada and the United States are the best and worst performers with 10.6 and 6.7 Mg DM hr<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. We expect this dataset to provide an efficient way of estimating yields at a smaller scale by multiple combinations of GxE interactions. Biomass production from 1-year-old stems in the first harvest cycle is significantly lower than for the second and third year of the first harvest cycle (ANOVA, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Harvest cycles of 2 and 3 years did show significant but small differences in final yield (<i>t</i> = 3.87, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). A random forest statistical procedure was applied to test for the association of the predictor variables with biomass production. The model explained up to 63.65% of the variance observed in yield for all genotypes and sites, with genetic diversity among the most important variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short rotation coppice (SRC) willow is a second-generation lignocellulosic energy crop with a background of research and breeding programmes carried out globally for more than three decades. While commercial standards include planting in mixtures of 6–8 willow genotypes of genetic diversity, much research to date has focused on monoculture trials. Research has found significant differences in willow performance through different management methods, soil properties and environmental interactions (GxE), when applied locally. However, global analysis of these interactions remains a challenge. We present a global SRC willow dataset to facilitate researchers and growers with a resource not available to date to help in closing the gap between research and industry. Data has been collected through literature review and personal communications with key researchers on willow in the United Kingdom. Global annual average yield is 9 Mg Dry Matter (DM) ha−1 year−1 with 17 genotypes, including two types of mixtures, above the economic threshold of 10 Mg DM ha−1 year−1. Canada and the United States are the best and worst performers with 10.6 and 6.7 Mg DM hr−1 year−1, respectively. We expect this dataset to provide an efficient way of estimating yields at a smaller scale by multiple combinations of GxE interactions. Biomass production from 1-year-old stems in the first harvest cycle is significantly lower than for the second and third year of the first harvest cycle (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Harvest cycles of 2 and 3 years did show significant but small differences in final yield (t = 3.87, p < 0.001). A random forest statistical procedure was applied to test for the association of the predictor variables with biomass production. The model explained up to 63.65% of the variance observed in yield for all genotypes and sites, with genetic diversity among the most important variables.

Abstract Image

用于生物经济的全球短轮丛(SRC)柳树数据集:对英国产量的影响
短轮伐灌木(SRC)柳是第二代木质纤维素能源作物,其研究和育种计划在全球开展了30多年。虽然商业标准包括种植6-8种具有遗传多样性的柳树基因型的混合物,但迄今为止的许多研究都集中在单一栽培试验上。研究发现,在不同的管理方法、土壤性质和环境相互作用(GxE)下,柳树在当地的表现存在显著差异。然而,对这些相互作用的全局分析仍然是一个挑战。我们提出了一个全球SRC柳树数据集,以方便研究人员和种植者提供迄今为止不可用的资源,以帮助缩小研究和工业之间的差距。通过文献综述和与英国主要研究人员的个人交流收集数据。全球年平均产量为9 Mg干物质(DM) ha−1年−1,有17个基因型,包括两种混合类型,高于10 Mg干物质(DM) ha−1年−1的经济阈值。加拿大和美国是表现最好和最差的,分别为10.6和6.7 Mg DM hr−1年−1年。我们希望这个数据集能够提供一种有效的方法,通过多种GxE相互作用的组合来估计较小规模的产量。1年生茎在第一个收获周期的生物量产量显著低于第一个收获周期的第二年和第三年(方差分析,p < 0.001)。2年和3年的收获周期在最终产量上确实显示出显著但很小的差异(t = 3.87, p < 0.001)。随机森林统计程序用于检验预测变量与生物量生产的关联。该模型解释了所有基因型和位点产量差异的63.65%,其中遗传多样性是最重要的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信