Exotic Invasive Plant Species Increase Primary Productivity, but Not in Their Native Ranges

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1111/ele.70187
Ragan M. Callaway, Robert W. Pal, Adrian Schaar, David Hooper, Harald Auge, Isabell Hensen, Kevin Kožić, Ylva Lekberg, Dávid U. Nagy, Julian A. Selke, Arpad E. Thoma, Sabrina Träger, Christoph Rosche
{"title":"Exotic Invasive Plant Species Increase Primary Productivity, but Not in Their Native Ranges","authors":"Ragan M. Callaway,&nbsp;Robert W. Pal,&nbsp;Adrian Schaar,&nbsp;David Hooper,&nbsp;Harald Auge,&nbsp;Isabell Hensen,&nbsp;Kevin Kožić,&nbsp;Ylva Lekberg,&nbsp;Dávid U. Nagy,&nbsp;Julian A. Selke,&nbsp;Arpad E. Thoma,&nbsp;Sabrina Träger,&nbsp;Christoph Rosche","doi":"10.1111/ele.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ecosystem net primary productivity is thought to occur near the maximum that abiotic constraints allow; but exotic invasive plants often correlate with increased productivity. However, field patterns and experimental evidence for this come only from the non-native ranges of exotic species. Thus, we do not know if this pattern is caused by exotic invasions per se or whether successful exotic species are disproportionately productive or colonise more productive microsites. We measured aboveground biomass in the field and in common gardens with five plant species in their native and non-native ranges. For all species combined, exotic invaders increased total plot productivity in their non-native ranges by 91% in the field, and by 107% in the common garden, but had much smaller or no such effects in their native ranges. Thus, exotic invaders appear to be a <i>driver</i> of increased productivity, not simply a passenger, but only in their non-native ranges.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem net primary productivity is thought to occur near the maximum that abiotic constraints allow; but exotic invasive plants often correlate with increased productivity. However, field patterns and experimental evidence for this come only from the non-native ranges of exotic species. Thus, we do not know if this pattern is caused by exotic invasions per se or whether successful exotic species are disproportionately productive or colonise more productive microsites. We measured aboveground biomass in the field and in common gardens with five plant species in their native and non-native ranges. For all species combined, exotic invaders increased total plot productivity in their non-native ranges by 91% in the field, and by 107% in the common garden, but had much smaller or no such effects in their native ranges. Thus, exotic invaders appear to be a driver of increased productivity, not simply a passenger, but only in their non-native ranges.

Abstract Image

外来入侵植物增加初级生产力,但在其本土范围内没有
生态系统净初级生产力被认为接近非生物限制所允许的最大值;但外来入侵植物往往与生产力的提高有关。然而,这方面的野外模式和实验证据仅来自外来物种的非本地范围。因此,我们不知道这种模式是由外来入侵本身引起的,还是成功的外来物种不成比例地多产,或者在更多产的微地点定居。我们测量了五种植物在原生地和非原生地的地上生物量。对所有物种组合而言,外来入侵植物在其非本地区提高了91%的土地生产力,在普通花园提高了107%,但在其本地区则没有或较小的影响。因此,外来入侵者似乎是提高生产力的驱动力,而不仅仅是一个乘客,但只有在他们的非本地范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信