Initiating Sensory Science Research in Space Conditions—Current Practices and Future Perspectives

IF 14.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Thejani Prabodha, Lukas Danner, Gail N. Iles, Martina Heer, Isabelle Mack, Charles Brennan, Julia Low
{"title":"Initiating Sensory Science Research in Space Conditions—Current Practices and Future Perspectives","authors":"Thejani Prabodha,&nbsp;Lukas Danner,&nbsp;Gail N. Iles,&nbsp;Martina Heer,&nbsp;Isabelle Mack,&nbsp;Charles Brennan,&nbsp;Julia Low","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Space exploration continues to drive technological and scientific advancements, benefiting both space and Earth. This expanding sector, including commercial space stations, deep-space missions, and space tourism, presents unique challenges and opportunities for food researchers. A critical issue is the limited understanding of how space conditions such as microgravity, isolation, and confinement affect sensory perception, impacting astronauts’ nutritional intake and psychological well-being. This review based on a structured literature search strategy integrates existing data on flavor perception during spaceflight missions (<i>n</i> = 16), identifying sensory changes, altered flavor preferences, and cravings linked to space-related stressors. It also evaluates space analogs and simulations related to sensory research (<i>n</i> = 29), assessing their applicability for studying food perception in space conditions. It identified consistent sensory changes, including diminished taste sensitivity, increased preference for spicy or umami‑rich foods, and intense flavors. However, research in this area remains limited, with small sample sizes, inconsistent methodologies, and lack of comprehensive guidelines on applying analogs and simulations in sensory studies. These gaps raise challenges for researchers, particularly those without access to space analogs or simulations, in designing space-related studies. Critically analyzing the findings, the review identifies gaps in understanding the complex interactions between environmental, physiological, and sensory factors. It also outlines potential methodological pathways to strengthen future evidence generation, such as implementing ecologically valid research approaches and validated analog designs, including combined use of multiple analog environments to better replicate the multidimensional sensory context. Addressing these challenges will support astronaut well-being and foster innovations that benefit both space and Earth-based applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70241","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Space exploration continues to drive technological and scientific advancements, benefiting both space and Earth. This expanding sector, including commercial space stations, deep-space missions, and space tourism, presents unique challenges and opportunities for food researchers. A critical issue is the limited understanding of how space conditions such as microgravity, isolation, and confinement affect sensory perception, impacting astronauts’ nutritional intake and psychological well-being. This review based on a structured literature search strategy integrates existing data on flavor perception during spaceflight missions (n = 16), identifying sensory changes, altered flavor preferences, and cravings linked to space-related stressors. It also evaluates space analogs and simulations related to sensory research (n = 29), assessing their applicability for studying food perception in space conditions. It identified consistent sensory changes, including diminished taste sensitivity, increased preference for spicy or umami‑rich foods, and intense flavors. However, research in this area remains limited, with small sample sizes, inconsistent methodologies, and lack of comprehensive guidelines on applying analogs and simulations in sensory studies. These gaps raise challenges for researchers, particularly those without access to space analogs or simulations, in designing space-related studies. Critically analyzing the findings, the review identifies gaps in understanding the complex interactions between environmental, physiological, and sensory factors. It also outlines potential methodological pathways to strengthen future evidence generation, such as implementing ecologically valid research approaches and validated analog designs, including combined use of multiple analog environments to better replicate the multidimensional sensory context. Addressing these challenges will support astronaut well-being and foster innovations that benefit both space and Earth-based applications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

启动空间条件下的感觉科学研究——当前实践与未来展望
太空探索继续推动科技进步,使空间和地球都受益。这个不断扩大的领域,包括商业空间站、深空任务和太空旅游,给食品研究人员带来了独特的挑战和机遇。一个关键问题是,人们对微重力、隔离和禁闭等空间条件如何影响感官知觉、影响宇航员的营养摄入和心理健康的理解有限。这篇综述基于结构化的文献检索策略,整合了航天任务中有关味觉感知的现有数据(n = 16),确定了与太空相关压力源相关的感官变化、改变的味觉偏好和渴望。它还评估了与感官研究相关的空间类似物和模拟(n = 29),评估了它们在空间条件下研究食物感知的适用性。它发现了持续的感官变化,包括味觉敏感度下降,对辛辣或鲜味丰富的食物的偏好增加,以及口味强烈。然而,这一领域的研究仍然有限,样本量小,方法不一致,缺乏在感官研究中应用类似物和模拟的综合指南。这些差距给研究人员,特别是那些无法获得空间模拟或模拟的研究人员在设计与空间有关的研究时提出了挑战。通过对研究结果的批判性分析,该综述指出了在理解环境、生理和感官因素之间复杂相互作用方面的差距。它还概述了加强未来证据生成的潜在方法途径,例如实施生态有效的研究方法和经过验证的模拟设计,包括结合使用多种模拟环境来更好地复制多维感官环境。解决这些挑战将支持宇航员的福祉,并促进有利于空间和地球应用的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信