Development and validation of nutrition knowledge questionnaire for cancer-related anorexia and cachexia syndrome in Taiwanese patients with cancer

Q3 Nursing
Tzu-Fang Chen , Tsae-Jyy Wang , Shu-Yuan Liang , Chieh-Yu Liu , Shiow-Chwen Tsai , Gwo-Chi Hu
{"title":"Development and validation of nutrition knowledge questionnaire for cancer-related anorexia and cachexia syndrome in Taiwanese patients with cancer","authors":"Tzu-Fang Chen ,&nbsp;Tsae-Jyy Wang ,&nbsp;Shu-Yuan Liang ,&nbsp;Chieh-Yu Liu ,&nbsp;Shiow-Chwen Tsai ,&nbsp;Gwo-Chi Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with over half of patients dying from cancer-related anorexia–cachexia syndrome (CACS). CACS is characterized by progressive weight loss and reductions in muscle and/or fat mass and considerably affects quality of life, prognosis, treatment tolerance, and length of hospitalization. Nutritional consultation or education is a key strategy for managing cancer-related cachexia. However, its effectiveness is determined by several factors, such as patients' nutritional knowledge. To date, no standardized tool has been developed for assessing the nutrition knowledge of patients with cancer specific to CACS. This study developed and validated the Cancer-Related Anorexia and Cachexia Syndrome Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire (CACSNKQ) to assess patients' understanding of nutrition in the context of cachexia.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The initial version of the CACSNKQ comprised 35 items. The validation process involved content validity assessment, item analysis, reliability testing by using the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20), and the criterion-groups technique. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify underlying factors and refine the questionnaire by eliminating items with low factor loadings or cross loadings.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The CACSNKQ was validated in a sample of 203 participants. The content validity analysis revealed that item-level content validity indices exceeded 0.80, and internal consistency was strong, with the KR-20 coefficient being &gt;0.80. The exploratory factor analysis yielded a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin coefficient of 0.869. Following the analysis, the questionnaire was refined to include 21 items, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of cachexia-related nutrition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CACSNKQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing cachexia-related nutrition knowledge. In clinical practice, this tool can enhance awareness among patients and health-care providers regarding the importance of nutritional knowledge in managing CACS. In academic and research contexts, it can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating the effectiveness of nutrition education programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"63 ","pages":"Pages 143-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266726852500083X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with over half of patients dying from cancer-related anorexia–cachexia syndrome (CACS). CACS is characterized by progressive weight loss and reductions in muscle and/or fat mass and considerably affects quality of life, prognosis, treatment tolerance, and length of hospitalization. Nutritional consultation or education is a key strategy for managing cancer-related cachexia. However, its effectiveness is determined by several factors, such as patients' nutritional knowledge. To date, no standardized tool has been developed for assessing the nutrition knowledge of patients with cancer specific to CACS. This study developed and validated the Cancer-Related Anorexia and Cachexia Syndrome Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire (CACSNKQ) to assess patients' understanding of nutrition in the context of cachexia.

Method

The initial version of the CACSNKQ comprised 35 items. The validation process involved content validity assessment, item analysis, reliability testing by using the Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20), and the criterion-groups technique. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify underlying factors and refine the questionnaire by eliminating items with low factor loadings or cross loadings.

Result

The CACSNKQ was validated in a sample of 203 participants. The content validity analysis revealed that item-level content validity indices exceeded 0.80, and internal consistency was strong, with the KR-20 coefficient being >0.80. The exploratory factor analysis yielded a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin coefficient of 0.869. Following the analysis, the questionnaire was refined to include 21 items, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of cachexia-related nutrition.

Conclusion

The CACSNKQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing cachexia-related nutrition knowledge. In clinical practice, this tool can enhance awareness among patients and health-care providers regarding the importance of nutritional knowledge in managing CACS. In academic and research contexts, it can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating the effectiveness of nutrition education programs.
台湾癌症患者癌症相关厌食症及恶病质综合征营养知识问卷的编制与验证
癌症仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,超过一半的患者死于癌症相关的厌食症-恶病质综合征(CACS)。CACS的特点是体重逐渐减轻,肌肉和/或脂肪量减少,并显著影响生活质量、预后、治疗耐受性和住院时间。营养咨询或教育是治疗癌症相关恶病质的关键策略。然而,它的有效性是由几个因素决定的,比如患者的营养知识。到目前为止,还没有开发出标准化的工具来评估CACS特异性癌症患者的营养知识。本研究开发并验证了癌症相关厌食症和恶病质综合征营养知识问卷(CACSNKQ),以评估患者在恶病质背景下对营养的理解。方法初版CACSNKQ量表共35项。验证过程包括内容效度评估、项目分析、使用库德-理查德森公式20 (KR-20)进行信度检验和标准组技术。探索性因子分析通过剔除低因子负荷量或交叉负荷量的条目来确定潜在因子,并对问卷进行细化。结果CACSNKQ在203名被试中得到验证。内容效度分析显示,项目层面的内容效度指标均超过0.80,内部一致性强,KR-20系数为0.80。探索性因子分析的Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin系数为0.869。在分析之后,问卷被改进为包括21个项目,得分越高表明对恶病质相关营养的了解越多。结论CACSNKQ是一种有效、可靠的评估恶病质相关营养知识的工具。在临床实践中,该工具可以提高患者和卫生保健提供者对营养知识在管理CACS中的重要性的认识。在学术和研究背景下,它可以作为评估营养教育计划有效性的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信