Nice to meet you.(!) Gendered norms in punctuation usage

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Yidan Yin , Gil Appel , Cheryl Jan Wakslak
{"title":"Nice to meet you.(!) Gendered norms in punctuation usage","authors":"Yidan Yin ,&nbsp;Gil Appel ,&nbsp;Cheryl Jan Wakslak","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People face a myriad of daily decisions about how to communicate, especially in today's digital world. We consider the decision to use exclamation points as a window into how men and women navigate the mundane choices that guide so much of their day to day communication. Across five studies, our findings suggest that exclamation point usage is associated more with women than with men, that these normative expectations are impactful, and that women – who are more sensitive to potential downstream impression formation implications of using exclamation points – think about this issue more than men and are more uncertain of their exclamation point usage. We further find that the decision to use exclamations does indeed shape social perception, leading to more positive impressions overall but also some negative concerns; however, we do not find evidence that these effects are moderated by communicator gender. Our findings provide insight into how men and women engage in everyday communication in the face of normative expectations related to gender and shed light on the unexpected burdens that this can create.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People face a myriad of daily decisions about how to communicate, especially in today's digital world. We consider the decision to use exclamation points as a window into how men and women navigate the mundane choices that guide so much of their day to day communication. Across five studies, our findings suggest that exclamation point usage is associated more with women than with men, that these normative expectations are impactful, and that women – who are more sensitive to potential downstream impression formation implications of using exclamation points – think about this issue more than men and are more uncertain of their exclamation point usage. We further find that the decision to use exclamations does indeed shape social perception, leading to more positive impressions overall but also some negative concerns; however, we do not find evidence that these effects are moderated by communicator gender. Our findings provide insight into how men and women engage in everyday communication in the face of normative expectations related to gender and shed light on the unexpected burdens that this can create.
很高兴认识你。标点符号使用中的性别规范
人们每天都要面对无数关于如何沟通的决定,尤其是在当今的数字世界。我们认为,使用感叹号的决定是一扇窗口,可以让我们了解男性和女性是如何在日常交流中做出选择的。在五项研究中,我们的发现表明,感叹号的使用与女性的关系比与男性的关系更大,这些规范的期望是有影响的,而女性——她们对使用感叹号的潜在下游印象形成的影响更敏感——比男性更多地考虑这个问题,更不确定她们感叹号的使用。我们进一步发现,使用感叹号的决定确实塑造了社会感知,总体上导致了更积极的印象,但也带来了一些消极的担忧;然而,我们没有发现证据表明这些影响受到传播者性别的调节。我们的研究结果揭示了男性和女性在面对与性别相关的规范期望时是如何进行日常交流的,并揭示了这可能带来的意想不到的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信