Andre M. Nicolau MD , Robert P. Giugliano MD, SM , Andre Zimerman MD, PhD , Jonathan Afilalo MD, MSc , Baris Gencer MD, MPH , Jan Steffel MD , Michael G. Palazzolo MS , John W. Eikelboom MBBS , Christopher B. Granger MD , Manesh R. Patel MD , Renato D. Lopes MD, PhD , Bernard J. Gersh MD , Belal Suleiman MD , Joris R. de Groot MD , Mauricio I. Scanavacca MD , Christian T. Ruff MD, MPH , Elliott M. Antman MD , Eugene Braunwald MD , Lars Wallentin MD
{"title":"Outcomes in Older Patients After Switching to a Newer Anticoagulant or Remaining on Warfarin","authors":"Andre M. Nicolau MD , Robert P. Giugliano MD, SM , Andre Zimerman MD, PhD , Jonathan Afilalo MD, MSc , Baris Gencer MD, MPH , Jan Steffel MD , Michael G. Palazzolo MS , John W. Eikelboom MBBS , Christopher B. Granger MD , Manesh R. Patel MD , Renato D. Lopes MD, PhD , Bernard J. Gersh MD , Belal Suleiman MD , Joris R. de Groot MD , Mauricio I. Scanavacca MD , Christian T. Ruff MD, MPH , Elliott M. Antman MD , Eugene Braunwald MD , Lars Wallentin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Whether frail, elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) should switch to a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) was studied in the FRAIL-AF trial and remains controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in the COMBINE-AF data set, the impact on clinical outcomes of switching frail, elderly AF patients from VKA to DOAC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>COMBINE-AF consists of individual patient-level data from 71,683 patients with AF in 4 randomized clinical trials comparing DOAC vs warfarin. Frailty was evaluated using a frailty index derived from a modified Rockwood’s Accumulation Model including 18 age-related conditions. Patients with a frailty index score above the median were considered frail. Prespecified outcomes were stroke or systemic embolic events, bleeding events, death, and a net clinical outcome combining these events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 5,913 patients who were frail, elderly (age ≥75 years), and VKA-experienced and 52,721 patients who did not meet all 3 of these criteria. Patients were randomized to a standard-dose (SD) DOAC or warfarin. After 27 months median follow-up, there was no heterogeneity in treatment effect with SD-DOAC vs warfarin among those who met all 3 criteria vs those who did not for the endpoints of stroke or systemic embolic events (HR: 0.83 vs 0.81; <em>P</em><sub><em>int</em></sub> = 0.75) or for death (HR: 0.95 vs 0.91; <em>P</em><sub><em>int</em></sub> = 0.54). Major bleeding was similar with SD-DOAC vs warfarin in frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients (HR: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.90-1.25]), while it was significantly reduced with SD-DOAC in patients without all 3 criteria (HR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.76-0.89]; <em>P</em><sub><em>int</em></sub> = 0.007). Likewise, the net clinical outcome was similar in the frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients with SD-DOAC vs warfarin (HR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.91-1.13]), while significantly reduced with SD-DOAC patients without all 3 criteria (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.93]; <em>P</em><sub><em>int</em></sub> = 0.028). Fatal and intracranial bleeding were significantly reduced with SD-DOAC in both subgroups to a similar degree (both <em>P</em><sub><em>int</em></sub> > 0.05), while gastrointestinal bleeding with SD-DOAC was increased to a greater degree in frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients (HR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.42-2.36]) compared with those without all 3 criteria (HR: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.09-1.39]; <em>P</em><sub><em>int</em></sub> = 0.006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients with AF switched to SD-DOAC experienced significant reductions in stroke or systemic embolism, fatal and intracranial bleeding, and death. Gastrointestinal bleeding was increased with SD-DOAC, while major bleeding and the primary net clinical outcome were similar. Based on these findings, SD-DOAC is a reasonable choice for frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients to reduce stroke and systemic embolism, death, and the most serious types of bleeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":"86 6","pages":"Pages 426-439"},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109725067178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Whether frail, elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) should switch to a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) was studied in the FRAIL-AF trial and remains controversial.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in the COMBINE-AF data set, the impact on clinical outcomes of switching frail, elderly AF patients from VKA to DOAC.
Methods
COMBINE-AF consists of individual patient-level data from 71,683 patients with AF in 4 randomized clinical trials comparing DOAC vs warfarin. Frailty was evaluated using a frailty index derived from a modified Rockwood’s Accumulation Model including 18 age-related conditions. Patients with a frailty index score above the median were considered frail. Prespecified outcomes were stroke or systemic embolic events, bleeding events, death, and a net clinical outcome combining these events.
Results
We identified 5,913 patients who were frail, elderly (age ≥75 years), and VKA-experienced and 52,721 patients who did not meet all 3 of these criteria. Patients were randomized to a standard-dose (SD) DOAC or warfarin. After 27 months median follow-up, there was no heterogeneity in treatment effect with SD-DOAC vs warfarin among those who met all 3 criteria vs those who did not for the endpoints of stroke or systemic embolic events (HR: 0.83 vs 0.81; Pint = 0.75) or for death (HR: 0.95 vs 0.91; Pint = 0.54). Major bleeding was similar with SD-DOAC vs warfarin in frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients (HR: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.90-1.25]), while it was significantly reduced with SD-DOAC in patients without all 3 criteria (HR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.76-0.89]; Pint = 0.007). Likewise, the net clinical outcome was similar in the frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients with SD-DOAC vs warfarin (HR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.91-1.13]), while significantly reduced with SD-DOAC patients without all 3 criteria (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.85-0.93]; Pint = 0.028). Fatal and intracranial bleeding were significantly reduced with SD-DOAC in both subgroups to a similar degree (both Pint > 0.05), while gastrointestinal bleeding with SD-DOAC was increased to a greater degree in frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients (HR: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.42-2.36]) compared with those without all 3 criteria (HR: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.09-1.39]; Pint = 0.006).
Conclusions
Frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients with AF switched to SD-DOAC experienced significant reductions in stroke or systemic embolism, fatal and intracranial bleeding, and death. Gastrointestinal bleeding was increased with SD-DOAC, while major bleeding and the primary net clinical outcome were similar. Based on these findings, SD-DOAC is a reasonable choice for frail, elderly, VKA-experienced patients to reduce stroke and systemic embolism, death, and the most serious types of bleeding.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints.
Content Profile:
-Original Investigations
-JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews
-JACC Review Topics of the Week
-Guidelines & Clinical Documents
-JACC Guideline Comparisons
-JACC Scientific Expert Panels
-Cardiovascular Medicine & Society
-Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation)
-Research Letters
-Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages
-Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders