Effect of Sintering Speed of Large Laboratory Furnaces on Marginal and Internal Gaps of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.

IF 1.8
Ewa Wilkin, Laura Althea Cuschieri, Juliana No-Cortes, Glenn Cassar, David Paul Mifsud, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes
{"title":"Effect of Sintering Speed of Large Laboratory Furnaces on Marginal and Internal Gaps of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.","authors":"Ewa Wilkin, Laura Althea Cuschieri, Juliana No-Cortes, Glenn Cassar, David Paul Mifsud, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-speed sintering protocols have been used to expedite the production of zirconia crowns. However, information on the impact of different sintering speeds on the marginal and internal crown adaptation is sparse and only available for chairside systems. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different sintering speed protocols on Sintering Speed on Marginal and Internal Gaps of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This in-vitro study was performed on a total of 45 prefabricated standardized resin tooth preparations for study models. Each preparation received a monolithic zirconia crown designed and milled using a high-end computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system. The crowns were divided in 3 groups of 15 crowns each, according to the sintering protocols available in the system of the laboratory furnace used: conventional (8h), fast (3.5h) or ultra-fast sintering (75 min). Marginal and internal gaps of all crowns were assessed using a high-resolution digital microscope. Statistically significant differences among groups were assessed with the one-way ANOVA test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding marginal gap, conventional sintering (37.83 ± 10.41μm) was slightly outperformed by both fast (30.64 ± 9.32μm) and ultra-fast (24.01 ± 5.62μm) groups (p=.003), with a significant pairwise difference between the first and the latter (p=.006). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences among groups for internal gap measurements (p=.393).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three groups obtained satisfactory marginal and internal gap values. However, the present findings suggest that ultra-fast sintering speed protocols lead to smaller marginal gap of CAD-CAM zirconia crowns, as compared to the conventional counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: High-speed sintering protocols have been used to expedite the production of zirconia crowns. However, information on the impact of different sintering speeds on the marginal and internal crown adaptation is sparse and only available for chairside systems. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different sintering speed protocols on Sintering Speed on Marginal and Internal Gaps of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.

Material and methods: This in-vitro study was performed on a total of 45 prefabricated standardized resin tooth preparations for study models. Each preparation received a monolithic zirconia crown designed and milled using a high-end computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) system. The crowns were divided in 3 groups of 15 crowns each, according to the sintering protocols available in the system of the laboratory furnace used: conventional (8h), fast (3.5h) or ultra-fast sintering (75 min). Marginal and internal gaps of all crowns were assessed using a high-resolution digital microscope. Statistically significant differences among groups were assessed with the one-way ANOVA test.

Results: Regarding marginal gap, conventional sintering (37.83 ± 10.41μm) was slightly outperformed by both fast (30.64 ± 9.32μm) and ultra-fast (24.01 ± 5.62μm) groups (p=.003), with a significant pairwise difference between the first and the latter (p=.006). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences among groups for internal gap measurements (p=.393).

Conclusion: All three groups obtained satisfactory marginal and internal gap values. However, the present findings suggest that ultra-fast sintering speed protocols lead to smaller marginal gap of CAD-CAM zirconia crowns, as compared to the conventional counterparts.

大型实验室炉烧结速度对CAD-CAM整体氧化锆冠边缘和内部间隙的影响
目的:采用高速烧结工艺来加快氧化锆冠的生产。然而,关于不同烧结速度对边缘和内部冠适应的影响的信息很少,并且仅适用于椅边系统。本研究的目的是评估不同烧结速度方案对CAD-CAM单片氧化锆冠边缘和内部间隙烧结速度的影响。材料和方法:本体外研究采用45个预制的标准化树脂牙体作为研究模型。每种制备材料都使用高端计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)系统设计和铣削一个单片氧化锆冠。根据实验室炉系统的烧结方案,将烤瓷冠分为3组,每组15个烤瓷冠:常规(8h)、快速(3.5h)或超快速烧结(75 min)。使用高分辨率数码显微镜评估所有冠的边缘和内部间隙。采用单因素方差分析评估组间差异有统计学意义。结果:在边缘间隙方面,快速组(30.64±9.32μm)和超快速组(24.01±5.62μm)均略优于常规烧结组(37.83±10.41μm) (p= 0.003),超快速组(30.64±9.32μm)和超快速组(24.01±5.62μm) (p= 0.006)。此外,组间内部间隙测量差异无统计学意义(p=.393)。结论:三组均获得满意的边缘和内部间隙值。然而,目前的研究结果表明,与常规方法相比,超快烧结速度方案导致CAD-CAM氧化锆冠的边缘间隙更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信