Should we be scoring pain differently for rib fractures? A comparison of two scoring systems.

IF 2
Kate V Lauer, Ann P O'Rourke, Katie E Austin-Nash, Ben L Zarzaur, Nicole L Werner
{"title":"Should we be scoring pain differently for rib fractures? A comparison of two scoring systems.","authors":"Kate V Lauer, Ann P O'Rourke, Katie E Austin-Nash, Ben L Zarzaur, Nicole L Werner","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Uncontrolled rib fracture pain can lead to hypoventilation, impaired airway clearance, and progression to respiratory failure and death. Pain control is a mainstay of treatment, but pain assessments are most commonly obtained while a patient is at rest. A novel approach is to assess movement-evoked pain in order to better capture pain that limits physical function. We hypothesized that movement-evoked pain scores (MPS) for patients with rib fractures would be higher than resting pain scores (RPS) and would better correlate with opioid administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed at a single Level 1 trauma center. Adult trauma patients (≥18 years old) admitted between January and March of 2022 with at least one rib fracture were included. Patients with other significant injuries (non-chest AIS >2) or those unable to self-report pain scores were excluded. Pain was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 10 indicating the most severe pain. RPS and MPS obtained at the same time during the first ten hospital days were averaged, and the means were compared using paired t-tests. Additionally, mean daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 80 patients (median age 69 [IQR 48-79]; 65 % male; 88 % white). The majority were involved in blunt trauma (95 %) with a median length of admission of 4 days (IQR 2-8). The median number of rib fractures was 4 (IQR 2-6), and the median injury severity score was 10 (IQR 9-14). A total of 1692 paired pain scores from 416 patient hospital days were analyzed with higher mean daily MPS across all hospital days (p < 0.001). MPS and RPS differed for 79 % of patient hospital days, with a mean difference of 2.3 (SD 1.4, p < 0.001). Higher mean daily MPS were correlated with higher mean daily opioid use (R<sup>2</sup>=0.54), and days with differing scores had higher mean MME [42.5 (SD 49.6) vs 23.6 (56.1)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resting and movement-evoked pain scores for patients with rib fractures varied significantly, and movement-evoked pain scores were consistently higher. Opioid use was positively correlated with movement-evoked pain scores. Utilization of movement-evoked pain scores may improve patient pain control and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Uncontrolled rib fracture pain can lead to hypoventilation, impaired airway clearance, and progression to respiratory failure and death. Pain control is a mainstay of treatment, but pain assessments are most commonly obtained while a patient is at rest. A novel approach is to assess movement-evoked pain in order to better capture pain that limits physical function. We hypothesized that movement-evoked pain scores (MPS) for patients with rib fractures would be higher than resting pain scores (RPS) and would better correlate with opioid administration.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed at a single Level 1 trauma center. Adult trauma patients (≥18 years old) admitted between January and March of 2022 with at least one rib fracture were included. Patients with other significant injuries (non-chest AIS >2) or those unable to self-report pain scores were excluded. Pain was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 10 indicating the most severe pain. RPS and MPS obtained at the same time during the first ten hospital days were averaged, and the means were compared using paired t-tests. Additionally, mean daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were analyzed.

Results: The cohort consisted of 80 patients (median age 69 [IQR 48-79]; 65 % male; 88 % white). The majority were involved in blunt trauma (95 %) with a median length of admission of 4 days (IQR 2-8). The median number of rib fractures was 4 (IQR 2-6), and the median injury severity score was 10 (IQR 9-14). A total of 1692 paired pain scores from 416 patient hospital days were analyzed with higher mean daily MPS across all hospital days (p < 0.001). MPS and RPS differed for 79 % of patient hospital days, with a mean difference of 2.3 (SD 1.4, p < 0.001). Higher mean daily MPS were correlated with higher mean daily opioid use (R2=0.54), and days with differing scores had higher mean MME [42.5 (SD 49.6) vs 23.6 (56.1)].

Conclusions: Resting and movement-evoked pain scores for patients with rib fractures varied significantly, and movement-evoked pain scores were consistently higher. Opioid use was positively correlated with movement-evoked pain scores. Utilization of movement-evoked pain scores may improve patient pain control and outcomes.

我们应该对肋骨骨折的疼痛进行不同的评分吗?两种评分系统的比较。
不受控制的肋骨骨折疼痛可导致通气不足,气道清除受损,并进展为呼吸衰竭和死亡。疼痛控制是治疗的主要手段,但疼痛评估通常是在病人休息时进行的。一种新的方法是评估运动引起的疼痛,以便更好地捕捉限制身体功能的疼痛。我们假设肋骨骨折患者的运动诱发疼痛评分(MPS)高于静息疼痛评分(RPS),并且与阿片类药物的使用有更好的相关性。方法:在一个一级创伤中心进行回顾性观察性研究。纳入2022年1月至3月收治的至少一根肋骨骨折的成人创伤患者(≥18岁)。排除其他明显损伤(非胸部AIS bbbb2)或无法自我报告疼痛评分的患者。疼痛的评分为0-10分,10分表示最严重的疼痛。取前10个住院日同时获得的RPS和MPS的平均值,采用配对t检验比较平均值。此外,还分析了平均每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)。结果:该队列包括80例患者(中位年龄69 [IQR 48-79];65%男性;88%白色)。大多数为钝性创伤(95%),中位住院时间为4天(IQR 2-8)。肋骨骨折中位数为4例(IQR 2 ~ 6),损伤严重程度评分中位数为10例(IQR 9 ~ 14)。416个患者住院日的1692个配对疼痛评分被分析,所有住院日的平均每日MPS较高(p < 0.001)。MPS和RPS在79%的患者住院天数中存在差异,平均差异为2.3 (SD 1.4, p < 0.001)。较高的平均每日MPS与较高的平均每日阿片类药物使用量相关(R2=0.54),不同评分天数的平均MME较高[42.5 (SD 49.6) vs 23.6(56.1)]。结论:肋骨骨折患者静息和运动诱发疼痛评分差异显著,运动诱发疼痛评分始终较高。阿片类药物使用与运动诱发疼痛评分呈正相关。使用运动诱发疼痛评分可以改善患者的疼痛控制和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信