Lack of Association of Emotional Distress With Insulin Initiation in the GRADE Randomized Diabetes Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

IF 2.2
Caroline A Presley, Nicole M Butera, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, Cyrus V Desouza, Priscilla A Hollander, Claire J Hoogendoorn, Violet S Lagari, Elizabeth A Legowski, Catherine L Martin, Neda Rasouli, Jeffrey S Gonzalez, Andrea L Cherrington
{"title":"Lack of Association of Emotional Distress With Insulin Initiation in the GRADE Randomized Diabetes Comparative Effectiveness Trial.","authors":"Caroline A Presley, Nicole M Butera, Heidi Krause-Steinrauf, Cyrus V Desouza, Priscilla A Hollander, Claire J Hoogendoorn, Violet S Lagari, Elizabeth A Legowski, Catherine L Martin, Neda Rasouli, Jeffrey S Gonzalez, Andrea L Cherrington","doi":"10.1177/26350106251361363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate whether higher emotional distress (depressive symptoms or diabetes distress) was associated with a lower likelihood of basal or rapid-acting insulin initiation among participants enrolled in the GRADE Emotional Distress Substudy (EDS).MethodsIndividuals with type 2 diabetes <10 years duration on metformin alone were randomized to add 1 of 4 glucose-lowering drugs. Per protocol, participants were expected to start basal or rapid-acting insulin rescue therapy after reaching secondary or tertiary glycemic outcomes (A1C >7.5%). Depressive symptoms and diabetes distress were assessed ≤12 months prior to outcome confirmation. Multinomial and binomial logistic regression models examined associations of depressive symptoms and diabetes distress with basal insulin initiation and rapid-acting insulin initiation, respectively.ResultsOf the 525 participants expected to start basal insulin, 30.9% initiated ≤6 weeks, 35.2% initiated >6 weeks, and 33.9% never initiated. Of the 325 participants expected to start rapid-acting insulin, 67.4% never initiated. Neither depressive symptoms nor diabetes distress were associated with starting basal or rapid-acting insulin.ConclusionsIn the GRADE EDS, approximately one-third of participants did not start basal insulin, and two-thirds of participants did not start rapid-acting insulin. Emotional distress did not appear to play a role in insulin initiation among trial participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":" ","pages":"382-393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106251361363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate whether higher emotional distress (depressive symptoms or diabetes distress) was associated with a lower likelihood of basal or rapid-acting insulin initiation among participants enrolled in the GRADE Emotional Distress Substudy (EDS).MethodsIndividuals with type 2 diabetes <10 years duration on metformin alone were randomized to add 1 of 4 glucose-lowering drugs. Per protocol, participants were expected to start basal or rapid-acting insulin rescue therapy after reaching secondary or tertiary glycemic outcomes (A1C >7.5%). Depressive symptoms and diabetes distress were assessed ≤12 months prior to outcome confirmation. Multinomial and binomial logistic regression models examined associations of depressive symptoms and diabetes distress with basal insulin initiation and rapid-acting insulin initiation, respectively.ResultsOf the 525 participants expected to start basal insulin, 30.9% initiated ≤6 weeks, 35.2% initiated >6 weeks, and 33.9% never initiated. Of the 325 participants expected to start rapid-acting insulin, 67.4% never initiated. Neither depressive symptoms nor diabetes distress were associated with starting basal or rapid-acting insulin.ConclusionsIn the GRADE EDS, approximately one-third of participants did not start basal insulin, and two-thirds of participants did not start rapid-acting insulin. Emotional distress did not appear to play a role in insulin initiation among trial participants.

在GRADE随机糖尿病比较疗效试验中,情绪困扰与胰岛素启动缺乏关联。
目的本研究的目的是评估在GRADE情绪困扰亚研究(EDS)的参与者中,较高的情绪困扰(抑郁症状或糖尿病困扰)是否与较低的基础或速效胰岛素启动可能性相关。方法2型糖尿病患者(7.5%)。在结果确认前≤12个月评估抑郁症状和糖尿病困扰。多项和二项logistic回归模型分别检验了抑郁症状和糖尿病困扰与基础胰岛素启动和速效胰岛素启动的关系。在525名预期开始基础胰岛素治疗的参与者中,30.9%的人开始治疗≤6周,35.2%的人开始治疗≤6周,33.9%的人从未开始治疗。在325名预期开始使用速效胰岛素的参与者中,67.4%从未开始使用。抑郁症状和糖尿病困扰与开始使用基础胰岛素或速效胰岛素无关。在GRADE EDS中,大约三分之一的参与者没有开始使用基础胰岛素,三分之二的参与者没有开始使用速效胰岛素。在试验参与者中,情绪困扰似乎并没有在胰岛素启动中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信