Clinical Use of Inpatient FDG-PET/CT in Internal Medicine.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shoshana Amos, Matan Fischer, Fadi Kharouf, Limor Rubin, Simona Ben-Haim, Marina Orevi, Dror Mevorach
{"title":"Clinical Use of Inpatient FDG-PET/CT in Internal Medicine.","authors":"Shoshana Amos, Matan Fischer, Fadi Kharouf, Limor Rubin, Simona Ben-Haim, Marina Orevi, Dror Mevorach","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>FDG-PET/CT is useful in internal medicine for evaluation of patients with various inflammatory presentations. However, data regarding its diagnostic role in inpatients is limited. This study aims to assess the contribution of FDG-PET/CT in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Israel from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed FDG-PET/CT scans of 260 adult inpatients from Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Medical Intensive Care, and Intensive Cardiac Care units. Scans done solely for malignancy follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in diagnosis and/or management, assessed by at least two physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 260 patients, indications included infection (42%), inflammation (35%), suspected malignancy (17%), cardiac disease (5%), and other (1%). 80% of studies were clinically helpful. In 40% treatment was changed, either in type (27%) or duration (13%). 9% of studies contributed to diagnosis alone, and 7% contributed to localization. 23% were negative studies, eliminating additional testing. 1% showed incidental findings requiring treatment. In 43% of studies, there were new findings that were not visible by prior morphologic imaging. A significantly higher percentage of clinically helpful studies was observed in patients with foreign devices compared with those without devices (89% versus 74%, P = 0.003), while immunocompromised patients had a lower percentage of clinically helpful studies (74% versus 84%, P = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-PET/CT is a useful, noninvasive diagnostic tool in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Intensive Care. This modality may aid in treatment and prevent unnecessary invasive procedures in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: FDG-PET/CT is useful in internal medicine for evaluation of patients with various inflammatory presentations. However, data regarding its diagnostic role in inpatients is limited. This study aims to assess the contribution of FDG-PET/CT in hospitalized patients.

Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Israel from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed FDG-PET/CT scans of 260 adult inpatients from Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Medical Intensive Care, and Intensive Cardiac Care units. Scans done solely for malignancy follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in diagnosis and/or management, assessed by at least two physicians.

Results: Among the 260 patients, indications included infection (42%), inflammation (35%), suspected malignancy (17%), cardiac disease (5%), and other (1%). 80% of studies were clinically helpful. In 40% treatment was changed, either in type (27%) or duration (13%). 9% of studies contributed to diagnosis alone, and 7% contributed to localization. 23% were negative studies, eliminating additional testing. 1% showed incidental findings requiring treatment. In 43% of studies, there were new findings that were not visible by prior morphologic imaging. A significantly higher percentage of clinically helpful studies was observed in patients with foreign devices compared with those without devices (89% versus 74%, P = 0.003), while immunocompromised patients had a lower percentage of clinically helpful studies (74% versus 84%, P = 0.06).

Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT is a useful, noninvasive diagnostic tool in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Intensive Care. This modality may aid in treatment and prevent unnecessary invasive procedures in selected patients.

住院患者fdg-pet / ct在内科的临床应用。
目的:FDG-PET/CT在内科评价各种炎症表现的临床应用价值。然而,关于其在住院患者中的诊断作用的数据是有限的。本研究旨在评估FDG-PET/CT在住院患者中的作用。方法:2015 - 2020年在以色列某三级医疗中心进行观察性队列研究。我们分析了260名来自内科、心脏病科、内科重症监护和心脏重症监护病房的成年住院患者的FDG-PET/CT扫描。排除单纯用于恶性肿瘤随访的扫描。主要结局是诊断和/或治疗的改变,由至少两名医生评估。结果:260例患者中,指征包括感染(42%)、炎症(35%)、疑似恶性肿瘤(17%)、心脏病(5%)和其他(1%)。80%的研究在临床上有帮助。在40%的治疗中,改变了治疗类型(27%)或持续时间(13%)。9%的研究有助于诊断,7%的研究有助于定位。23%为阴性研究,排除了额外的检测。1%为偶发发现,需要治疗。在43%的研究中,有先前的形态学成像无法看到的新发现。与未使用器械的患者相比,使用外国器械的患者进行临床有益研究的比例明显更高(89%对74%,p=0.003),而免疫功能低下的患者进行临床有益研究的比例较低(74%对84%,p=0.06)。结论:FDG-PET/CT是一种有用的、无创的诊断工具,适用于内科、心脏科和重症监护患者。这种方式可以帮助治疗和防止不必要的侵入性手术在选定的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信