An umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis on the effectiveness of digital health interventions for cognitive function improvement in the elderly.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yi Deng, Minqi Wang, Can Li, Hong Wu
{"title":"An umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis on the effectiveness of digital health interventions for cognitive function improvement in the elderly.","authors":"Yi Deng, Minqi Wang, Can Li, Hong Wu","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01257-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of DHIs in improving cognitive function among older adults and to explore whether participant characteristics moderate these effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with the study pre-registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD420251003146). The eligibility criteria were clearly defined using the PICOS framework. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases including Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool and the corrected covered area (CCA) was calculated to evaluate overlap between studies, ensuring the reliability of the meta-meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving 31,093 older adults were included. The findings indicated that DHIs had a significant positive impact on global cognitive function (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.60, p < 0.001). The positive effects were also found across specific cognitive domains, including attention (SMD = 0.41), memory (SMD = 0.37), executive function (SMD = 0.35), and processing speed (SMD = 0.21). Furthermore, the subgroup analyses demonstrated that individuals with MCI and dementia experienced greater cognitive improvements from the interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that DHIs hold substantial potential for enhancing cognitive function in the elderly population. By providing timely and personalized interventions, they can effectively improve cognitive outcomes, offering practical utility in clinical settings, and informing the development of policies aimed at expanding access to cognitive health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01257-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of DHIs in improving cognitive function among older adults and to explore whether participant characteristics moderate these effects.

Methods: An umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with the study pre-registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD420251003146). The eligibility criteria were clearly defined using the PICOS framework. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases including Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool and the corrected covered area (CCA) was calculated to evaluate overlap between studies, ensuring the reliability of the meta-meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 31 systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving 31,093 older adults were included. The findings indicated that DHIs had a significant positive impact on global cognitive function (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.60, p < 0.001). The positive effects were also found across specific cognitive domains, including attention (SMD = 0.41), memory (SMD = 0.37), executive function (SMD = 0.35), and processing speed (SMD = 0.21). Furthermore, the subgroup analyses demonstrated that individuals with MCI and dementia experienced greater cognitive improvements from the interventions.

Conclusion: The results suggest that DHIs hold substantial potential for enhancing cognitive function in the elderly population. By providing timely and personalized interventions, they can effectively improve cognitive outcomes, offering practical utility in clinical settings, and informing the development of policies aimed at expanding access to cognitive health services.

数字健康干预对老年人认知功能改善的有效性综述和meta-meta分析。
目的:本研究旨在系统评估DHIs在改善老年人认知功能方面的有效性,并探讨参与者的特征是否会调节这些效果。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行综合评价和meta-meta分析,该研究在PROSPERO数据库(CRD420251003146)预注册。使用PICOS框架明确定义了资格标准。在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括Web of Science、PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus和Cochrane Library。使用AMSTAR 2工具评估方法学质量,并计算校正覆盖面积(CCA)以评估研究之间的重叠,确保meta-meta分析的可靠性。结果:共纳入31项系统综述和荟萃分析,涉及31,093名老年人。结果表明,DHIs对整体认知功能有显著的积极影响(SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40-0.60, p)。结论:DHIs对老年人的认知功能有很大的改善潜力。通过提供及时和个性化的干预措施,它们可以有效地改善认知结果,在临床环境中提供实际效用,并为旨在扩大获得认知健康服务的政策的制定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信