Patient and Clinician Feedback to Inform the Development of a New Pain-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Pelvic Floor Surgery.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sheymonti S Hoque, Susannah Ahern, Helen E O'Connell, Rasa Ruseckaite
{"title":"Patient and Clinician Feedback to Inform the Development of a New Pain-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Pelvic Floor Surgery.","authors":"Sheymonti S Hoque, Susannah Ahern, Helen E O'Connell, Rasa Ruseckaite","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06248-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic floor procedures may result in pain, negatively affecting women's health-related quality of life. Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) inadequately capture specific pain attributes and their relationship to pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). This study aimed to pretest items for a new pain-specific PROM post-pelvic floor surgery through focus groups/interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study utilised six focus groups/interviews with 15 adult Australian and New Zealand women with PFDs experiencing post-surgical pain and mesh complications. Consolidation with the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry Steering Committee, consisting of 11 clinicians, also occurred. Women and clinicians provided feedback regarding 35 potential items for the new pain-specific PROM. Data from the discussions were transcribed and then thematically analysed using NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women and clinicians agreed the new PROM could effectively address PFDs and pelvic floor surgical pain. Their feedback guided decision-making to modify items and design the pain instrument. Women recommended removing 14 of the 35 items, and clinicians from the registry steering committee suggested removing a further five items. The preliminary PROM with 16 items has been developed under seven key pain-related domains: sensation, region, intensity and continuity, triggers, interference, comorbidities and complications, and pain relief and management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This qualitative study obtained direct input from women with PFDs and clinicians in formulating items for the new measure. A preliminary version of the PROM was produced from the feedback. Once fully developed and validated, the PROM could assist shared patient-clinician decision-making and track pain-related health outcomes important to women following pelvic floor surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06248-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic floor procedures may result in pain, negatively affecting women's health-related quality of life. Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) inadequately capture specific pain attributes and their relationship to pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). This study aimed to pretest items for a new pain-specific PROM post-pelvic floor surgery through focus groups/interviews.

Methods: This qualitative study utilised six focus groups/interviews with 15 adult Australian and New Zealand women with PFDs experiencing post-surgical pain and mesh complications. Consolidation with the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry Steering Committee, consisting of 11 clinicians, also occurred. Women and clinicians provided feedback regarding 35 potential items for the new pain-specific PROM. Data from the discussions were transcribed and then thematically analysed using NVivo.

Results: Women and clinicians agreed the new PROM could effectively address PFDs and pelvic floor surgical pain. Their feedback guided decision-making to modify items and design the pain instrument. Women recommended removing 14 of the 35 items, and clinicians from the registry steering committee suggested removing a further five items. The preliminary PROM with 16 items has been developed under seven key pain-related domains: sensation, region, intensity and continuity, triggers, interference, comorbidities and complications, and pain relief and management.

Conclusions: This qualitative study obtained direct input from women with PFDs and clinicians in formulating items for the new measure. A preliminary version of the PROM was produced from the feedback. Once fully developed and validated, the PROM could assist shared patient-clinician decision-making and track pain-related health outcomes important to women following pelvic floor surgery.

患者和临床医生反馈,为骨盆底手术患者报告的新的疼痛特异性结果测量的发展提供信息。
盆底手术可能导致疼痛,对妇女健康相关的生活质量产生负面影响。现有的患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)不能充分捕捉特定的疼痛属性及其与盆底疾病(PFDs)的关系。本研究旨在通过焦点小组/访谈对骨盆底手术后新的疼痛特异性PROM进行预测试。方法:本定性研究采用6个焦点小组/访谈,对15名患有PFDs的澳大利亚和新西兰成年妇女进行了手术后疼痛和补片并发症。由11名临床医生组成的澳大利亚盆底手术登记指导委员会也进行了巩固。妇女和临床医生提供了35项关于新的疼痛特异性PROM的潜在项目的反馈。来自讨论的数据被转录,然后使用NVivo进行主题分析。结果:妇女和临床医生一致认为,新的PROM可以有效地解决pfd和骨盆底手术疼痛。他们的反馈指导了修改项目和设计疼痛工具的决策。女性建议删除35项中的14项,注册指导委员会的临床医生建议再删除5项。初步的PROM包含16个项目,分为七个关键的疼痛相关领域:感觉、区域、强度和连续性、触发、干扰、合并症和并发症、疼痛缓解和管理。结论:这项定性研究获得了pfd妇女和临床医生在制定新措施项目方面的直接投入。从反馈中产生了PROM的初步版本。一旦完全开发和验证,PROM可以帮助共同的患者临床医生决策和跟踪疼痛相关的健康结果,这对盆底手术后的妇女很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信